It's obvious, that Windows XP has a Java 2 VM (including the SWING-module),
because we can all run Java 2 applets in Internet Explorer. But what about
the support for Java 2 Applications?
I would just like to run an application packed in a JAR-file on Windows XP:
JavaProg.jar (Java Archive Resource). But without installing a SDK, i don't
have an association of the JAR-file to be started with JAVAW, or the JAVA
command to use 'java -jar JavaProg.jar'. I know that the Java 2 VM on
Windows XP can run applets from a JAR-file with the archive="JavaPr og.jar"
attribute in the <APPLET> tag. So it is obvious that the VM can run Java 2
programs from JAR-files.
If I would like to send my JavaProg.jar to a friend of mine, who is using
Windows XP, what should I tell him to do? With a normal Windows XP setup,
he does not have the JAVA-command or the JAR-file association to JAVAW,
as I have with my SDK installed. Wouldn't he be able to run my application
with the VM from the Windows XP installation, or would he really have to
download a really BIG file with a new VM first? I guess that there MUST
be a full Java 2 VMto both applets and applications with Windows XP. But
what should we do to run this JAR-application on it?
We need the JAR-file association, or the JAVA-command to run the program
from the command-prompt. Maybe it is very obvious how to do this, but I have
no idea of what to change or what to install!
On the other hand, if we have what we need to run an application from a
JAR-file, why isn't there made some association to JAR-files as a standard
on Windows XP? -Or maybe it is just my setup, there is something wrong with?
I would probably not be able to make my friend run my Java-Program, if he
would have to download some of these very BIG files with new Virtual
Machines from Sun or MicroSoft first. It's many MB, and it takes several
hours on a modem-connection to Internet.
How do we configure this standard VM to run the application? -Or isn't it
possible at all without installing extra software first?
Would be really glad, if someone had a simple solution on this problem.
/PC
because we can all run Java 2 applets in Internet Explorer. But what about
the support for Java 2 Applications?
I would just like to run an application packed in a JAR-file on Windows XP:
JavaProg.jar (Java Archive Resource). But without installing a SDK, i don't
have an association of the JAR-file to be started with JAVAW, or the JAVA
command to use 'java -jar JavaProg.jar'. I know that the Java 2 VM on
Windows XP can run applets from a JAR-file with the archive="JavaPr og.jar"
attribute in the <APPLET> tag. So it is obvious that the VM can run Java 2
programs from JAR-files.
If I would like to send my JavaProg.jar to a friend of mine, who is using
Windows XP, what should I tell him to do? With a normal Windows XP setup,
he does not have the JAVA-command or the JAR-file association to JAVAW,
as I have with my SDK installed. Wouldn't he be able to run my application
with the VM from the Windows XP installation, or would he really have to
download a really BIG file with a new VM first? I guess that there MUST
be a full Java 2 VMto both applets and applications with Windows XP. But
what should we do to run this JAR-application on it?
We need the JAR-file association, or the JAVA-command to run the program
from the command-prompt. Maybe it is very obvious how to do this, but I have
no idea of what to change or what to install!
On the other hand, if we have what we need to run an application from a
JAR-file, why isn't there made some association to JAR-files as a standard
on Windows XP? -Or maybe it is just my setup, there is something wrong with?
I would probably not be able to make my friend run my Java-Program, if he
would have to download some of these very BIG files with new Virtual
Machines from Sun or MicroSoft first. It's many MB, and it takes several
hours on a modem-connection to Internet.
How do we configure this standard VM to run the application? -Or isn't it
possible at all without installing extra software first?
Would be really glad, if someone had a simple solution on this problem.
/PC
Comment