
Paolo Beria
PAPER LIST is still not complete!
less
Related Authors
C. Michael Hall
University of Canterbury/Te Whare Wānanga o Waitaha
Mišo Mudrić
University of Zagreb
Nikos Passas
Northeastern University
Don Ross
University College Cork
David Seamon
Kansas State University
Armando Marques-Guedes
UNL - New University of Lisbon
Rodrigo Luís Kanayama
Universidade Federal do Paraná
Enrica Papa
University of Westminster
Luis Arroyo Jiménez
University of Castilla-La Mancha
InterestsView All (16)
Uploads
Papers by Paolo Beria
country to major destinations, giving an important contribution to social and geographical inclusion, but remaining
limited in absolute numbers and receiving marginal attention by the general public and even policy makers.
After years of stability, the industry is going to face radical changes in the next years since its liberalisation process,
gradually started in 2007, was completed at the end of 2013, changing from exclusive concessions to non-exclusive
authorisations.
In this paper we perform some spatial and scenario analyses, with particular reference to competing transport modes
and new potential markets.
The industry supplied more than 88 million bus-km in 2012, serving about 2.6 billion passenger-km. The existing
network, providing a particularly extensive service in the South and in the Centre of the country, directly serves 2/3 of
Italian population.
New opportunities are arising as a consequence of liberalisation, changes in competing modes (in particular long
distance railway services) and changes in characteristics of part of the country also as a consequence of more recent
internal migration phenomena.
Coach services in 2013 are serving only 27,000 origin-destination, including indirect connection, out of about 115,000
formally allowed. Many relations, including some very important in terms of total mobility, are still unexplored and left
to competing transport modes (rail and air).
Our analyses suggest that the most promising relations for possible new services appear to be those among the Centre
and the North-East of the country, with a polarisation on urban areas having limited rail services.
decisions involved are often taken on a qualitative basis or, at best, by setting some indicators and verifying how much a
plan or a scenario reaches the politically decided targets (e.g. “increasing by 10% the use of bike”). However, given that
decisions on plans involve relevant public investments and may also determine radical changes in users’ costs, a more
quantitative and comprehensive approach to the evaluation is needed.
Cost Benefit Analysis is the tool commonly used to assess public expenditure, but its application to mobility plans
introduces further practical and theoretical complexity.
The aim of the paper is to discuss how CBA can be used to assess complex and multi-modal mobility plans (involving
for example both infrastructural investments and lighter sustainable mobility policies). Firstly we will discuss which are
the complexities involved by plan assessments vs. infrastructure assessments. Secondly, we will revise the available
approaches, namely the Generalised Costs comparison approach, the Rule of Half and the logsum functions for the perfect
integration between CBA and transport models. Thirdly, we will comment the main advantages and problems of the last
approach, namely, the logsum, clarifying why it is the most suitable for the assessment of plans made of a broad range of
policies and actions. Finally, we will outline an ongoing application for the assessment of the SUMP (Sustainable Urban
Mobility Plan) of Milan’s municipality.