Garry Guan 关学君
Garry Guan, an ethnic Manchu Chinese American, is a professional interpreter and translator, an independent scholar in Archaeology, Anthropology, Sociology, Ethnography, History, Tibetology, and Linguistics, a stand-up comic, an active Rotarian, and most important of all, a dedicated father and husband. Garry holds a bachelor's degree in history and archaeology from Peking University, one of China’s most prestigious institutions, and a master's degree in anthropology and ethnography from Beijing's Central University of Nationalities (currently the Minzu University of China). He completed all the course work and passed the comprehensive exam for a Ph.D. (ABD) in archaeology and anthropology at the University of Pittsburgh and served as a senior archaeologist for numerous archaeological and environmental consulting firms. He recently served as a Field Archaeologist on the Cal Fire 2021 Debris Removal Project at Tetra Tech, Inc. in Northern California.
Garry devoted himself to helping bridge the communication gap and promote understanding and unity among cultures, particularly the American and Asian cultures. Garry founded A-A Language Services, LLC. to provide a full range of multilingual and multimedia communication services in all languages to private businesses and government agencies around the world.
In March 2014, he was appointed as Managing Editor of Chinese Cultural Relics, a quarterly journal published by East View Press based in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and returned to his beloved field of Chinese archaeology and the academic circle. He is also appointed to be a Research Associate of History of Arts and Architecture in the Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences, Department of History of Art and Architecture, the University of Pittsburgh in July 2016.
Garry was the First Asian American in the history of this state to win as a Republican Nominee for Georgia State Senate District 5 in the 2010 election, and once again as a Republican Nominee for Georgia State Senate District 40 in the 2020 election.
Guan has served in leadership roles in numerous civil, professional, and academic organizations. In 2007 he was inducted into Who’s Who in Asian American Communities (WWAAC). He was also recognized as among the Top 25 Most Influential Asian Americans in Georgia in 2011 by Georgia Asian Times. He is the past president of the Rotary Club of North DeKalb (Now Rotary Club of North Atlanta) from 2003 to 2004. He is a graduate of the class of 2006 of Atlanta Regional Leadership Institute. He is an affiliated member of the Register of Professional Archaeologists (RPA).
Garry now resides in Atlanta, Georgia, and is married to Paulina Maychun Guan. They have two children, William and Tana.
Phone: 770-634-4188
Address: 87-1054 OheOhe Street
Waianae, HI 96792
Garry devoted himself to helping bridge the communication gap and promote understanding and unity among cultures, particularly the American and Asian cultures. Garry founded A-A Language Services, LLC. to provide a full range of multilingual and multimedia communication services in all languages to private businesses and government agencies around the world.
In March 2014, he was appointed as Managing Editor of Chinese Cultural Relics, a quarterly journal published by East View Press based in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and returned to his beloved field of Chinese archaeology and the academic circle. He is also appointed to be a Research Associate of History of Arts and Architecture in the Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences, Department of History of Art and Architecture, the University of Pittsburgh in July 2016.
Garry was the First Asian American in the history of this state to win as a Republican Nominee for Georgia State Senate District 5 in the 2010 election, and once again as a Republican Nominee for Georgia State Senate District 40 in the 2020 election.
Guan has served in leadership roles in numerous civil, professional, and academic organizations. In 2007 he was inducted into Who’s Who in Asian American Communities (WWAAC). He was also recognized as among the Top 25 Most Influential Asian Americans in Georgia in 2011 by Georgia Asian Times. He is the past president of the Rotary Club of North DeKalb (Now Rotary Club of North Atlanta) from 2003 to 2004. He is a graduate of the class of 2006 of Atlanta Regional Leadership Institute. He is an affiliated member of the Register of Professional Archaeologists (RPA).
Garry now resides in Atlanta, Georgia, and is married to Paulina Maychun Guan. They have two children, William and Tana.
Phone: 770-634-4188
Address: 87-1054 OheOhe Street
Waianae, HI 96792
less
Related Authors
InterestsView All (42)
Uploads
Videos by Garry Guan 关学君
For those who may need captions/subtitles, please follow the link below to Vimeo, you will have a choice of multiple languages, including Chinese Simplified, Chinese Traditional, Tagalog, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, Samoan, and Spanish:
https://vimeo.com/manage/videos/724438031
Papers by Garry Guan 关学君
archeological survey of a 2,941-acre sample of 4,389 acres of proposed timber sale areas in Compartments 24, 40, 44, and 49 of the Tiak District in Oklahoma; Compartment 48 of the Choctaw District in Oklahoma; Compartments 939 and 940 of the Mena District in Arkansas; and Compartments 1243, 1279, 1284, 1323, and 1324 of the Poteau District in Arkansas of the Ouachita National Forest. The survey was conducted for the USDA Forest Service by New South Associates, Inc. between January 26 and March 2, 1993, as part of Contract No. 53-7 A86-2-29, Delivery Order 00-7 A86-3-0027. This report presents the results and site recommendations of compartment/stand areas for the fourth of four priority areas included in the survey of 8,380 total acres to be examined under this delivery order. The purpose of these management summaries is to facilitate timely review by the SHPO office of land parcel surveys scheduled for timber sale prior to the submittal of the final report. Completed Arkansas and Oklahoma site forms are included with this management summary providing documentation of all sites discovered in this priority area.
The final report to be completed before February 2, 1994, will provide
complete documentation of the survey areas, field strategies, research design, results, and final site recommendations of the full 8,380-acre survey. This submittal will be accompanied by processed artifacts and other records required under the guidelines for survey provided by the states of Arkansas and Oklahoma.
The field investigation was carried out by two crews consisting of four
persons each under the direction of Project Archeologist Garry Guan, assisted by Crew Leader Craig Hanson. Ishmael Williams served as Principal Investigator during the initial stages of the project and was succeeded by J. W. Joseph in this role. Mr. Charles Cantley and Mr. Williams conducted the background literature and cultural resource records check for this priority area.
The initial Phase I survey for the Anson County Landfill was conducted by Garrow & Associates, Inc. between September 17, 1991, and January 20, 1992. A report of this study was submitted in April 1992 (Gunn and Wilson 1992), which identified and documented 17 sites within the survey area. Twelve of 17 sites identified were considered potentially eligible for the National Register of historic Places. The North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources reviewed the report and concurred with these recommendations (David Brook, letter to Gregory C. Cekander dated August 26, 1992).
The fieldwork for these additional archaeological investigations was conducted between September 22 and 23, 1992 by Garry X. Guan, field director, and archaeological field technicians, Todd Payne, William Buckworth, Krise Fowler, Bret Hamilton, Melissa Moore, and Victoria Owens. The investigations focused on the identification and recordation of historic and prehistoric resources within the proposed project area
(Figure 2). The Phase I survey consisted of a pedestrian walkover with systematic surface inspection in areas exhibiting at least 25 percent visibility, combined with systematic shovel testing in archaeologically sensitive areas to ascertain the presence or absence of subsurface remains.
The additional acreage falls into the area covered by the background data in the original
Phase I survey report (Gunn and Wilson 1992). For the environmental setting and cultural history of the survey area in general, please refer to that report.
The approximately 90 acres are comprised of three major areas (see Figure 2):
The Railroad North area is located west of Boylin Road and north of the CSX Transportation rail line and consists of approximately 48 acres (including land tracts 7010, 6743, 6381, 8192, 8890, 2479, 9688, 5916, and parts of 0474 and 3331). Part of this area covers a ridge top and is roughly triangular in shape, but is actually comprised of two parts separated by the Richmond Sturdivant Cemetery (Figure 2). The second part of the area is a rectangular area along the north side of the railroad to the southwest of the triangular area. This area includes a small portion of another hilltop at the far west end and the valley between these two hilltops. Two private trailer homes are found along Boylin Road within this area. Vegetation of the area consists of mainly hardwood secondary growth, with an open understory. The elevation of this area is between 285 and 320 feet AMSL.
of Transportation will impact site 36AL134, near Bridgeville, in Allegheny
County, Pennsylvania. Phase II investigations were conducted by Greenhorne & O'Mara, Inc. to determine the site's eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places, and to make recommendations for mitigation to the site if it was found eligible for the National Register.
Phase I investigation identified two concentrations of cultural
material. The western concentration yielded diagnostic pieces (sherds and
projectile points) from the Middle or Late Woodland period. The eastern
concentration yielded no diagnostic artifacts, but a large hearth-like
feature, and a cultural layer associated with a paleosol buried beneath 50
centimeters (ems.) of sterile overburden were found. The Phase I
investigation also identified waterlogged vegetal deposits from 2.5 meters
below the surface. This was identified as a possible Pleistocene bog.
The Phase II investigation included shovel test pits (STPs), one-meter
square stratified test units, and a program of investigation with a three-inch bucket auger. A review of the site included geomorphological analysis.
Two radiocarbon samples were submitted to the University of Georgia for
dating. A sample was obtained from the buried "bog" deposits. Pollen
samples were collected from the profile of the 3-meter deep pit to these
"bog" vegetal deposits.
The Phase II investigation supported the two concentrations identified
in the Phase I research. The Phase II investigation further subdivided the
western and eastern concentrations. Area A in the western concentration
included heavy concentrations of lithic material and some sherds. Almost
all the diagnostic artifacts recovered in both the Phase I and the Phase II
investigations came from Area A. These indicated a Middle or Late Woodland
date for the occupation. While most of the artifacts came from the plow
zone, some deposits were found in situ below the plow zone. Area B within the western concentration was more deeply buried. An Adena Point, a fragment of a hematite celt, and some possible limestone-tempered sherds were found in Area B, suggesting a Middle Woodland date for this deposit.
In the eastern concentration of artifacts, Area C was associated with a
dark paleosol under some 50 ems. of sterile overburden. One possible
limestone-tempered sherd suggested that this deposit also dated from the
Middle Woodland period. One possible trench feature was recovered. No
other evidence of structures was recovered from Area C. Area D in the
eastern concentration contained Feature 2, the hearthlike feature
encountered in the Phase I investigation. Another similar feature, Feature
7, was discovered in Area D. While no diagnostic artifacts were recovered
from Area D, a radiocarbon date of 4,686 years B.P. +/- 118 years from
Feature 2 indicates a Late Archaic date for this deposit.
The geomorphological analysis combined with information from pollen and macrobotanical material from the deeply buried "bog" deposits allowed a reconstruction of the site formation processes. This reconstruction aided greatly in understanding the cultural deposits present on the site. Area A represents an island or higher lying piece of land, possibly extending to the railroad tracks to the west. Areas B and C are on alluvial deposits built up by periodic flooding of Chartiers Creek. Area D represents occupation on deposits above a Pleistocene terrace that was not disturbed by the shifting of Chartiers Creek.
The veg eta l remains 2. 5 meters below the surface of Area C and 1. 5
meters below the paleosols and the associated cultural deposits, appear to represent, not a Pleistocene bog, but deposits from a cut-off stream
channel. A radiocarbon date of 2,650 years B. P. +/- 53 years from this
deposit indicates that the 1 and surface where the paleosol developed was probably not built up and available for occupation until the Woodland
period. The vegetable remains and the pollen profile paints a picture of a
mixed mesophytic forest near an active stream much like that present today.
Significantly, the pollen associated with the paleosol and the cultural
deposits in Area C contain high (22 percent) amounts of Helianthus
(sunflower) as well as some Cucurbit (squash or pumpkin) pollen. This is
important evidence that farming may have been one activity carried out on
site 36AL134.
Site 36AL134 is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places.
It contains intact deposits from the Late Archaic, and Middle and Late
Woodland Periods. The Woodland occupations represent activities carried
out away from the well-studied village occupations. One of the activities
on the site appears to have been early horticulture. The Archaic hearth
includes artifacts and features in an undisturbed context and may be part
of an Archaic structure.
The proposed wetland replacement is likely to disturb all of the sites
36AL134. It is recommended that a data recovery program be conducted in each of the four areas identified to salvage information from the site will contribute to our understanding of the prehistory of Pennsylvania.
Detailed data recovery recommendations are included at the conclusion of this report.
. One prehistoric site 31AN60 is recommended and eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. The other four sites, 31AN61, 31AN64, 31AN76, and 31AN127, appear to be ineligible for the National Register of Historic Places, and no further work is recommended at those sites.
"Chin-ho" Muslin in Northern Thailand
Forbes, A. Translated into Chinese by G.Guan and Q. Guo. Published in Journal of Translations on EthnicStudies, No.4:48-54, Beijing, China.
By Christopher I. Beckwith, Central Asiatic Journal, 1977-01-01, Vol.21 (2), p.89-104
disarray. What remains of the tomb, with the exception of some scattered bricks, are many stone blocks, so the tomb was probably a masonry structure. All of the grave goods are gone, although an epitaph was collected at the scene. Based on its inscription, Tomb M1 was determined to be the Southern Song period tomb of Hu Hong.
and Heping Road in Mudan District, Heze City, Shandong Province (Figure 1). From October 2010 to January 2011, a joint project to excavate the shipwreck was conducted by the Shandong Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology and the Heze Municipal Commission for the Preservation of Ancient Monuments. A grid of twelve five-by-five meter excavation units delineated the area containing the shipwreck, and artifacts inside and outside this area were processed.
Translated by Elizabeth Berger, Ph.D. Candidate, Department
of Anthropology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Published in Chinese Cultural Relics Vol. 3, No. 1-2, 2016, pp.
Managing Editor: Garry Guan
Conference Presentations by Garry Guan 关学君
Registration Now Closed for the 2016 Chinese Cultural Relics
CCR Translation Contest for Young Scholars.
Thank you for your entries!
Click for update on submissions and evaluation process.
Open to current graduate students, postdoctoral fellows and young professionals in fields related to Chinese archaeology, history, ancient architecture and art history
Prizes of $1,000, $750 and $500 for the top three translations
Travel stipends for the top three finalists to attend an award ceremony held during the 2016 Society for East Asian Archaeology Worldwide Conference (June 8-12 in Boston)
Winning translations will be published in a forthcoming issue of Chinese Cultural Relics
Online registration has closed.
Click to read an update on the submissions and evaluation process.
Translation Selections
Category I: Archaeological Reports
Full article
Translation selection (6,727 words)
Category II: Research and Exploration
Full article
Translation selection (6,977 words)
Category III: Editor's Choice
Full article
Translation selection (6,331 words)
Contestants may choose any number of articles from the three listed above to submit for the contest; each contestant can only win one prize, even if he/she submits translations for more than one article. For complete details, please download the official contest rules.
~~~~~~~~~
The CCR Translation Contest for Young Scholars is sponsored by the editorial board of Chinese Cultural Relics, Asian American Media Group, Inc. and East View Press. Download complete contest details here or contact [email protected] for more information.
About Chinese Cultural Relics
Chinese Cultural Relics, a quarterly journal published in print and online by East View Press, is the official English translation of the prestigious Chinese archaeology journal Wenwu (Cultural Relics). For more information about the journal, please visit www.eastviewpress.com/Journals/CulturalRelics.aspx
About East View Press
East View Press is the journal and book publishing division of East View Information Services (www.eastview.com) and its related company, East View Geospatial (geospatial.com). Its publications are geared towards serving researchers and others interested in major international and public policy issues related to the geographic area of the former Soviet Union and China. Regardless of format, East View Press has the mission of adding special value (usually by translation into English) to authoritative source materials in order to make them available to the widest possible audience globally.
Drafts by Garry Guan 关学君
For those who may need captions/subtitles, please follow the link below to Vimeo, you will have a choice of multiple languages, including Chinese Simplified, Chinese Traditional, Tagalog, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, Samoan, and Spanish:
https://vimeo.com/manage/videos/724438031
archeological survey of a 2,941-acre sample of 4,389 acres of proposed timber sale areas in Compartments 24, 40, 44, and 49 of the Tiak District in Oklahoma; Compartment 48 of the Choctaw District in Oklahoma; Compartments 939 and 940 of the Mena District in Arkansas; and Compartments 1243, 1279, 1284, 1323, and 1324 of the Poteau District in Arkansas of the Ouachita National Forest. The survey was conducted for the USDA Forest Service by New South Associates, Inc. between January 26 and March 2, 1993, as part of Contract No. 53-7 A86-2-29, Delivery Order 00-7 A86-3-0027. This report presents the results and site recommendations of compartment/stand areas for the fourth of four priority areas included in the survey of 8,380 total acres to be examined under this delivery order. The purpose of these management summaries is to facilitate timely review by the SHPO office of land parcel surveys scheduled for timber sale prior to the submittal of the final report. Completed Arkansas and Oklahoma site forms are included with this management summary providing documentation of all sites discovered in this priority area.
The final report to be completed before February 2, 1994, will provide
complete documentation of the survey areas, field strategies, research design, results, and final site recommendations of the full 8,380-acre survey. This submittal will be accompanied by processed artifacts and other records required under the guidelines for survey provided by the states of Arkansas and Oklahoma.
The field investigation was carried out by two crews consisting of four
persons each under the direction of Project Archeologist Garry Guan, assisted by Crew Leader Craig Hanson. Ishmael Williams served as Principal Investigator during the initial stages of the project and was succeeded by J. W. Joseph in this role. Mr. Charles Cantley and Mr. Williams conducted the background literature and cultural resource records check for this priority area.
The initial Phase I survey for the Anson County Landfill was conducted by Garrow & Associates, Inc. between September 17, 1991, and January 20, 1992. A report of this study was submitted in April 1992 (Gunn and Wilson 1992), which identified and documented 17 sites within the survey area. Twelve of 17 sites identified were considered potentially eligible for the National Register of historic Places. The North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources reviewed the report and concurred with these recommendations (David Brook, letter to Gregory C. Cekander dated August 26, 1992).
The fieldwork for these additional archaeological investigations was conducted between September 22 and 23, 1992 by Garry X. Guan, field director, and archaeological field technicians, Todd Payne, William Buckworth, Krise Fowler, Bret Hamilton, Melissa Moore, and Victoria Owens. The investigations focused on the identification and recordation of historic and prehistoric resources within the proposed project area
(Figure 2). The Phase I survey consisted of a pedestrian walkover with systematic surface inspection in areas exhibiting at least 25 percent visibility, combined with systematic shovel testing in archaeologically sensitive areas to ascertain the presence or absence of subsurface remains.
The additional acreage falls into the area covered by the background data in the original
Phase I survey report (Gunn and Wilson 1992). For the environmental setting and cultural history of the survey area in general, please refer to that report.
The approximately 90 acres are comprised of three major areas (see Figure 2):
The Railroad North area is located west of Boylin Road and north of the CSX Transportation rail line and consists of approximately 48 acres (including land tracts 7010, 6743, 6381, 8192, 8890, 2479, 9688, 5916, and parts of 0474 and 3331). Part of this area covers a ridge top and is roughly triangular in shape, but is actually comprised of two parts separated by the Richmond Sturdivant Cemetery (Figure 2). The second part of the area is a rectangular area along the north side of the railroad to the southwest of the triangular area. This area includes a small portion of another hilltop at the far west end and the valley between these two hilltops. Two private trailer homes are found along Boylin Road within this area. Vegetation of the area consists of mainly hardwood secondary growth, with an open understory. The elevation of this area is between 285 and 320 feet AMSL.
of Transportation will impact site 36AL134, near Bridgeville, in Allegheny
County, Pennsylvania. Phase II investigations were conducted by Greenhorne & O'Mara, Inc. to determine the site's eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places, and to make recommendations for mitigation to the site if it was found eligible for the National Register.
Phase I investigation identified two concentrations of cultural
material. The western concentration yielded diagnostic pieces (sherds and
projectile points) from the Middle or Late Woodland period. The eastern
concentration yielded no diagnostic artifacts, but a large hearth-like
feature, and a cultural layer associated with a paleosol buried beneath 50
centimeters (ems.) of sterile overburden were found. The Phase I
investigation also identified waterlogged vegetal deposits from 2.5 meters
below the surface. This was identified as a possible Pleistocene bog.
The Phase II investigation included shovel test pits (STPs), one-meter
square stratified test units, and a program of investigation with a three-inch bucket auger. A review of the site included geomorphological analysis.
Two radiocarbon samples were submitted to the University of Georgia for
dating. A sample was obtained from the buried "bog" deposits. Pollen
samples were collected from the profile of the 3-meter deep pit to these
"bog" vegetal deposits.
The Phase II investigation supported the two concentrations identified
in the Phase I research. The Phase II investigation further subdivided the
western and eastern concentrations. Area A in the western concentration
included heavy concentrations of lithic material and some sherds. Almost
all the diagnostic artifacts recovered in both the Phase I and the Phase II
investigations came from Area A. These indicated a Middle or Late Woodland
date for the occupation. While most of the artifacts came from the plow
zone, some deposits were found in situ below the plow zone. Area B within the western concentration was more deeply buried. An Adena Point, a fragment of a hematite celt, and some possible limestone-tempered sherds were found in Area B, suggesting a Middle Woodland date for this deposit.
In the eastern concentration of artifacts, Area C was associated with a
dark paleosol under some 50 ems. of sterile overburden. One possible
limestone-tempered sherd suggested that this deposit also dated from the
Middle Woodland period. One possible trench feature was recovered. No
other evidence of structures was recovered from Area C. Area D in the
eastern concentration contained Feature 2, the hearthlike feature
encountered in the Phase I investigation. Another similar feature, Feature
7, was discovered in Area D. While no diagnostic artifacts were recovered
from Area D, a radiocarbon date of 4,686 years B.P. +/- 118 years from
Feature 2 indicates a Late Archaic date for this deposit.
The geomorphological analysis combined with information from pollen and macrobotanical material from the deeply buried "bog" deposits allowed a reconstruction of the site formation processes. This reconstruction aided greatly in understanding the cultural deposits present on the site. Area A represents an island or higher lying piece of land, possibly extending to the railroad tracks to the west. Areas B and C are on alluvial deposits built up by periodic flooding of Chartiers Creek. Area D represents occupation on deposits above a Pleistocene terrace that was not disturbed by the shifting of Chartiers Creek.
The veg eta l remains 2. 5 meters below the surface of Area C and 1. 5
meters below the paleosols and the associated cultural deposits, appear to represent, not a Pleistocene bog, but deposits from a cut-off stream
channel. A radiocarbon date of 2,650 years B. P. +/- 53 years from this
deposit indicates that the 1 and surface where the paleosol developed was probably not built up and available for occupation until the Woodland
period. The vegetable remains and the pollen profile paints a picture of a
mixed mesophytic forest near an active stream much like that present today.
Significantly, the pollen associated with the paleosol and the cultural
deposits in Area C contain high (22 percent) amounts of Helianthus
(sunflower) as well as some Cucurbit (squash or pumpkin) pollen. This is
important evidence that farming may have been one activity carried out on
site 36AL134.
Site 36AL134 is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places.
It contains intact deposits from the Late Archaic, and Middle and Late
Woodland Periods. The Woodland occupations represent activities carried
out away from the well-studied village occupations. One of the activities
on the site appears to have been early horticulture. The Archaic hearth
includes artifacts and features in an undisturbed context and may be part
of an Archaic structure.
The proposed wetland replacement is likely to disturb all of the sites
36AL134. It is recommended that a data recovery program be conducted in each of the four areas identified to salvage information from the site will contribute to our understanding of the prehistory of Pennsylvania.
Detailed data recovery recommendations are included at the conclusion of this report.
. One prehistoric site 31AN60 is recommended and eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. The other four sites, 31AN61, 31AN64, 31AN76, and 31AN127, appear to be ineligible for the National Register of Historic Places, and no further work is recommended at those sites.
"Chin-ho" Muslin in Northern Thailand
Forbes, A. Translated into Chinese by G.Guan and Q. Guo. Published in Journal of Translations on EthnicStudies, No.4:48-54, Beijing, China.
By Christopher I. Beckwith, Central Asiatic Journal, 1977-01-01, Vol.21 (2), p.89-104
disarray. What remains of the tomb, with the exception of some scattered bricks, are many stone blocks, so the tomb was probably a masonry structure. All of the grave goods are gone, although an epitaph was collected at the scene. Based on its inscription, Tomb M1 was determined to be the Southern Song period tomb of Hu Hong.
and Heping Road in Mudan District, Heze City, Shandong Province (Figure 1). From October 2010 to January 2011, a joint project to excavate the shipwreck was conducted by the Shandong Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology and the Heze Municipal Commission for the Preservation of Ancient Monuments. A grid of twelve five-by-five meter excavation units delineated the area containing the shipwreck, and artifacts inside and outside this area were processed.
Translated by Elizabeth Berger, Ph.D. Candidate, Department
of Anthropology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Published in Chinese Cultural Relics Vol. 3, No. 1-2, 2016, pp.
Managing Editor: Garry Guan
Registration Now Closed for the 2016 Chinese Cultural Relics
CCR Translation Contest for Young Scholars.
Thank you for your entries!
Click for update on submissions and evaluation process.
Open to current graduate students, postdoctoral fellows and young professionals in fields related to Chinese archaeology, history, ancient architecture and art history
Prizes of $1,000, $750 and $500 for the top three translations
Travel stipends for the top three finalists to attend an award ceremony held during the 2016 Society for East Asian Archaeology Worldwide Conference (June 8-12 in Boston)
Winning translations will be published in a forthcoming issue of Chinese Cultural Relics
Online registration has closed.
Click to read an update on the submissions and evaluation process.
Translation Selections
Category I: Archaeological Reports
Full article
Translation selection (6,727 words)
Category II: Research and Exploration
Full article
Translation selection (6,977 words)
Category III: Editor's Choice
Full article
Translation selection (6,331 words)
Contestants may choose any number of articles from the three listed above to submit for the contest; each contestant can only win one prize, even if he/she submits translations for more than one article. For complete details, please download the official contest rules.
~~~~~~~~~
The CCR Translation Contest for Young Scholars is sponsored by the editorial board of Chinese Cultural Relics, Asian American Media Group, Inc. and East View Press. Download complete contest details here or contact [email protected] for more information.
About Chinese Cultural Relics
Chinese Cultural Relics, a quarterly journal published in print and online by East View Press, is the official English translation of the prestigious Chinese archaeology journal Wenwu (Cultural Relics). For more information about the journal, please visit www.eastviewpress.com/Journals/CulturalRelics.aspx
About East View Press
East View Press is the journal and book publishing division of East View Information Services (www.eastview.com) and its related company, East View Geospatial (geospatial.com). Its publications are geared towards serving researchers and others interested in major international and public policy issues related to the geographic area of the former Soviet Union and China. Regardless of format, East View Press has the mission of adding special value (usually by translation into English) to authoritative source materials in order to make them available to the widest possible audience globally.
1.认同中华人民共和国；
2.认同中华民族；
3.认同中华文化；
4.认同中国共产党；
5.认同中国特色社会主义。
这显然把旅居、以及世居海外其它国家和地区的华人及华裔排除在“中华民族”之外了。针对这一现状，笔者引入“泛华裔族群”（可简称为“华族”）这个更大范围包容的新称谓与概念。并探讨了从清初至民国期间，佛教在泛华裔族群（包括“中华民族”）之民族意识及民族认同形成中的历史作用。