18th Law Commission of India Report On Investigation in India of Death in UK of Indian Baby Sunaina, 2008
I am forwarding herewith the 206th Report of the Law Commission of India on "Proposal for enactm... more I am forwarding herewith the 206th Report of the Law Commission of India on "Proposal for enactment of new Coroners Act applicable to the whole of India". The Delhi High Court in Writ Petition (C) No.6179/2007 between Social Jurist, a Civil Rights Group Vs. Union of India had recommended to the Law Commission of India to examine whether a legislation like the Coroners Act, 1988 prevalent in the United Kingdom is needed in this country and whether a suitable proposal for this purpose could be made to the Parliament in this regard. In view of this, the Commission undertook this study. It examined the Coroners Act, 1988 (UK), the existing Coroners Act, 1871 which was a Central Act but it has very narrow territorial limits in India, namely, the ordinary original civil jurisdiction of the High Courts of Calcutta and Bombay, along with the relevant provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The Commission is aware of the enormously expanded scope of Article 21 of the Constitution, viz., the right to know the correct cause of death of any person, especially when the death is unnatural or there are surrounding suspicious circumstances. The Commission is of the view that there is a necessity of an independent authority to enquire into the true and real cause of death of a person, even if such person dies outside the territorial limits of the country. Accordingly, a draft Bill has been appended and annexed to this Report as Annex.
Death of Baby Sunaina Chaudhari Second Pharmacist Expert Report 2008, 2008
I have compiled my second report in response to the second report of Professor Weindling dated 15... more I have compiled my second report in response to the second report of Professor Weindling dated 15/08/2004. In his second report, Professor Weindling had sight of my evidence based first Expert Report dated 24 March 2004.
First EXPERT REPORT on the death of baby sunaina, 2004
This is a most horrific case of clinical and criminal negligence involving a large number of medi... more This is a most horrific case of clinical and criminal negligence involving a large number of medical professionals, causing the death of a 5 month old baby by drug overdoses and lethal poisoning over a four week period. Those medical professionals defied all procedures, failed to follow the advice of the Guy’s Poison’s Unit, and continued to with ranitidine drug overdoses for another 3 weeks in a way which they knew would cause the death of the child. Further, on 20/10/2000, whilst the child was suffocating from the drug overdoses, they implemented an unlawful “DNR” or “Do Not Resuscitate” “withhold and withdraw” and “palliative care” instruction against the medical opinion of two doctors, against the wishes of the parents and without a court order. During the period of the “DNR”, these professionals recommended, prescribed and administered lethal potassium chloride, without monitoring, without it being indicated and in a manner which they knew would kill the child. Evidence from given at the inquest by two doctors that the death was indeed as a result of the ranitidine overdoses and potassium chloride. I support a new inquest, a police investigation independent of the Coroner and a Public Inquiry into this death. The
Death of Baby Sunaina Chaudhari Expert Report by Neelu Chaudhari (075777) Public Inquiry will investigate the current culture of multi-agency “social and medical ambush”, a cause of high death rates, unaccountability and cover-up within the National Health Service.
GIGANTIC PERVERSIONS OF BRITISH JUSTICE - A CASE FOR A SECOND INQUEST, 2001
A series of Freemason Judges' Errors Of Law decisions persecute the family for demanding Justice ... more A series of Freemason Judges' Errors Of Law decisions persecute the family for demanding Justice CHAPTER 1: Introduction-Freemason army of Judges persecute the family, for seeking justice into Sunaina's highly suspicious and sudden death, in an NHS hospital, at the hands of doctors, in British Courts. Way back, in the days of King Richard II, Old John of Gaunt, was, according to Shakespeare, obliged to cry out against injustice thus, "This land of such dear dear souls, dear land, Dear for her reputation through the world Is now leas'd out-I die pronouncing it-Like to a tenement or pelting farm". What was felt about England then, is what many of us now feel about out courts! Very few of our judges are still committed to ensure justice in our court. Many of them seem to be leasing out justice like a tenement or a pelting farm. Hence, the sum total, of this website is about the ways some of our judges, by virtue of their membership of Freemasonry, have perverted the course of justice in our dear, dear land. TO BE OR NOT TO BE When my sister Sadhana Dolly Chaudhari, a postgraduate certificated science teacher, and I, a pharmacist, found ourselves greatly afflicted by the death of baby Sunaina Chaudhari, my niece, and Chaudhari's daughter, we sought guidance from the Holy Writ. Now and then, quotations from Shakespear turned out to be very useful. For instance, to be or not to be, became the question with us. Were we to suffer the outrageous fortune brought by the killing of the five month old baby Sunaina or were we to take up arms against a sea of misfortune and by opposing them, end them? We decided to take up arms against a sea of misfortune. But what kind of arms were we to take? REPORTING OFFENCE The answer to that question was easy. The greatest philosopher, Socrates had given it. Though he had lived for the edification of mankind, yet he was sentenced to die for corrupting the youth. Although some of those who sentenced him to die wanted him to flee the country and escape death, yet, he refused to save his life saying something to the effect that, "Since I have lived by the law, it is only right that I die by the law too".
The cruelty with which Baby Sunaina was denied treatment and deliberately given wrong treatment w... more The cruelty with which Baby Sunaina was denied treatment and deliberately given wrong treatment with the intention of killing her, excites, even now, emotion, which provokes tears. From massive evidence proving (a) motive to kill, (b) gross medical negligence, (c) a number of criminal acts (d) many criminal omissions, and (e) criminal cover up, the question, "NHS MURDERS UK BABY SUNAINA" can be answered without any hesitation. Her own doctors, whose very terms and conditions of service were to save her life, killed her! By virtue of the Human Rights Act 1998, the Coroner's Act 1988 and the Criminal Law Act 1967 we are obliged to publish here, the evidence that prove that Baby Sunaina was indeed, intentionally killed. Under the Human Rights Act 1998, human life has precedence over all other rights. Hence, substantiated complaint of abuse of power of a public office, by taking away any human life, calls for intense public investigation by the Police and the Coroner etc. Section 4(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1967 makes it a mandatory duty for any person who knows that a crime has been committed, to report it for necessary investigations. Section 8 of the Coroner's Act 1988 places a duty on every person who has reason to believe that a deceased person died of unnatural causes i.e. died as a result of negligence, misconduct and unfair means, to inform the Coroner, or for that matter, the Police, of the facts and circumstances relating to the death.
We have reason to believe that Baby Sunaina died an unnatural death as a result of professional negligence, criminal misconduct and unfair means. Hence this article is a formal notice to the Coroner, the Police, the General Medical Council, the press and some public figures, of the facts and the circumstances relating to the death of Baby Sunaina. The following points of fact and of law prove, in our opinion, beyond reasonable doubt, that the life of Baby Sunaina Chaudhari (hereinafter referred to as Sunaina or Baby Sunaina) was taken away by her own doctors! Indeed, before and after her death, there was a gigantic criminal conspiracy to cover up all evidence of her killing!
About the Author by
Erick Otema Allimadi (Former Prime Minister of Uganda)
"There is nothing more... more About the Author by Erick Otema Allimadi (Former Prime Minister of Uganda) "There is nothing more natural," wrote Dr. Naphlim Akena Adoko in his book Mr. Minister, "than that a person endowed with sensibility should entertain respect and even affection towards his leaders. Yet , there is now nothing more certain than that the conduct of many people who have found themselves in position of respect and affection has been such that nobody in his senses could contemplate with approbation ." No one should thus be surpnsed that public expositions of the conduct of public officers which cannot be 'con tem plated with approbation ' have been the main mission of Dr. Adoko's life. Various newspapers in Uganda have described him as 'a thorn in the flesh ' of the corrupt elements in society' ( The Equator) , 'the torch bearer searching for inciden ces of the corrupt usage of power' (M unnansi), and as 'a person who never shrinks from describing a character , however grotesque , or an inciden t , however chilly' ( The People). While launching a book by Akena Adoko , entitled Coups and Corruptions in Africa, the Rev. Douglas Dean described Dr. Adbko as a disinterested artist who should be permitted wide latitude to expose mercilessly the disagreeable aspects of life. In that book , Adoko argues that ,in Africa today, coups are evils which have become necessary against governments headed by tyrants such as Emperor Jean-Bedel Bokassa and President Macias Nguema. He also argues that , as government is the greatest concern of aJl men , a leader who abuses the power of government should be liable to the greatest reproach . The book was such a reproach. It was not the first reproach of its kind. During President Milton Obote's second rule of Uganda, Dr. Adoko, who was then the managing director of the government-owned National Textiles Board , wrote a letter to all members of Parliament informing them that the Minister of Industry (in charge of the Textiles Board) and his own cousin , a general manager of a subsidiary company of the Board , had corruptly SH AP E\ *M ER GE FO RM AT obtained over 300 million shillings. Said Dr. Adoko, "I am the ma nager: I know the facts. I am also a lawyer: I know the law of libel." It was a bombshell. Parliamen t went into pandemoni um . Ha rdly any business was transacted that day. Notices were later given of the intention to sue for libel , although no suit was ever instituted . Adoko also brought a constitutional case against the Chief Justice of Uganda for a breach of oath of office. Withi n the month , the Chief Justice was dismissed. Af ter the fall of the Obote and the Okellos governmen ts, Dr. Adoko filed a constitutional case against the government of President Yoweri Museveni for usurping judicial functions vested in the court of law. He swore an affidavit to the effect that he had learnt 'with shame and consternation' of the withdrawal, by the Director of Public Prosecutions , of a criminal case that Dr. Adoko had instituted against a general manager of a public corporation. The case concerned the acquisition by fraud of a sum of money exceeding eight thousand million Uganda shiJlings. To Adoko, the withdrawal of that prosecution was a disgraceful abandonment of the principle that cases be withdrawn only on the basis of jutlicial consideration, and not in order to protect the accused person. The withdrawal of that case dealt a serious blow to the image and trustworthiness of the govern men t and the judiciary in the eyes of the public . Exposing abuses of power is, however, a risky job. Those exposed do not take it lying down . Dr. Adoko found himself severely criticised for the role he was alleged to have played as Chief General Service Officer during Obote's first rule. He had been responsible for the coordination of intelligence information for the use 2 of the Cabinet Security Committee of which he was secretary. He was accused of having been responsible for detentions. When Obote's first government fell, therefore, President ldi Amin appointed a Commission of Enquiry to investigate Akena Adoko and the General Service Department . Intense investigations were car ried out which completely exonerated Dr. Adoko. At that point, the Enquiry was discontinued. Furthermore, a British jury awarded Dr. Adoko a large sum in damages against an author, who, in a book , had repeated the allegation about the violation of huma n rights. The book had to be withdrawn from circulation and both its pu blishers and printers went into liquidation . In his book From Obote to Obote, Adoko has explained his role as Chief General Service Officer. He says it was a service of honour without any power of arrest , in terrogation or detention. "I never acted in the dark ," he stated. Nor was it really possible for him to act 'in the dark'. He was, at the same time, Presiden t of the Uganda Law Society and Chairman of the Uganda Professional Centre, i.e. head of the Uganda profession al association . In these capacities, he was very much involved in ensuring
the rule of law. To that end, he visited the prisons and successfully pleaded for the release of several detainees including Chief Magistrate Mpungu, advocates Dan Nabudere and Abu Mayanja , and many others. As a result of the constitutional case Dr. Adoko had instituted against the government of President Yoweri Museveni a decision was made to dismiss him from the government. But, there was no way of doing so without creating a worse scandal. Ultimately it was resolved that the National Textiles Board, managed by Adoko , be wound up. One sentence to that effect was inserted in the budget speech. Shortly afterwards, the Adoko family was chased out of their own house by the police, who threatened them with detention on suspicion of sympathisi ng with guerrillas. Much against their will, they were obliged to seek political asylum outside their motherland . As Dr. Adoko is a Bri tish-trained barrister , and his wife is a British-trained State Registered Nurse and Sick Children'sNurse,theycame toexileinBritainwheretheirqualificationsentitle them to earn their livelihood. While they were here , the Museveni govern ment exonerated the General Service Department of allegations of human rights violations. Ihave known Dr. Adoko since February 1960. He is a man who believes passionately that reason should be accorded supreme importance in the conduct of public affairs. In this book , he contends that, in the Jeffrey Archer libel case, reason was not given its due place in Justice Caulfield summing up to the jury . That is the theme of the book. A ll that constitutes an enchanting epic poem is to be found in the book: concealment, recognition revela tion , vicissitudes, and surprise upon surprise. No wonder therefore that the account brings a lump to the throat. As may be expected from an author who is a Papal Knight , the book is sprinkled with biblical quotations . (Dr. Adoko is a Papal Knight of Saint Gregory the Great.) Those of us who are close to him affectionately call him 'Sir Naph' .
is a Papal Knight of Saint Gregory the Great. He was President of the Uganda Law Society. He is a... more is a Papal Knight of Saint Gregory the Great. He was President of the Uganda Law Society. He is an American educated Social-Anthropologist with a Master and Doctorate degrees in comparative law. He is also an English trained Barrister but has voluntarily opted to have himself disbarred in order to expose corruption within the public service. Ten years ago, he wrote a book on the Jeffrey Archer Scandal. It exposed mercilessly the charges for which Lord Archer has now been prosecuted.
18th Law Commission of India Report On Investigation in India of Death in UK of Indian Baby Sunaina, 2008
I am forwarding herewith the 206th Report of the Law Commission of India on "Proposal for enactm... more I am forwarding herewith the 206th Report of the Law Commission of India on "Proposal for enactment of new Coroners Act applicable to the whole of India". The Delhi High Court in Writ Petition (C) No.6179/2007 between Social Jurist, a Civil Rights Group Vs. Union of India had recommended to the Law Commission of India to examine whether a legislation like the Coroners Act, 1988 prevalent in the United Kingdom is needed in this country and whether a suitable proposal for this purpose could be made to the Parliament in this regard. In view of this, the Commission undertook this study. It examined the Coroners Act, 1988 (UK), the existing Coroners Act, 1871 which was a Central Act but it has very narrow territorial limits in India, namely, the ordinary original civil jurisdiction of the High Courts of Calcutta and Bombay, along with the relevant provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The Commission is aware of the enormously expanded scope of Article 21 of the Constitution, viz., the right to know the correct cause of death of any person, especially when the death is unnatural or there are surrounding suspicious circumstances. The Commission is of the view that there is a necessity of an independent authority to enquire into the true and real cause of death of a person, even if such person dies outside the territorial limits of the country. Accordingly, a draft Bill has been appended and annexed to this Report as Annex.
Death of Baby Sunaina Chaudhari Second Pharmacist Expert Report 2008, 2008
I have compiled my second report in response to the second report of Professor Weindling dated 15... more I have compiled my second report in response to the second report of Professor Weindling dated 15/08/2004. In his second report, Professor Weindling had sight of my evidence based first Expert Report dated 24 March 2004.
First EXPERT REPORT on the death of baby sunaina, 2004
This is a most horrific case of clinical and criminal negligence involving a large number of medi... more This is a most horrific case of clinical and criminal negligence involving a large number of medical professionals, causing the death of a 5 month old baby by drug overdoses and lethal poisoning over a four week period. Those medical professionals defied all procedures, failed to follow the advice of the Guy’s Poison’s Unit, and continued to with ranitidine drug overdoses for another 3 weeks in a way which they knew would cause the death of the child. Further, on 20/10/2000, whilst the child was suffocating from the drug overdoses, they implemented an unlawful “DNR” or “Do Not Resuscitate” “withhold and withdraw” and “palliative care” instruction against the medical opinion of two doctors, against the wishes of the parents and without a court order. During the period of the “DNR”, these professionals recommended, prescribed and administered lethal potassium chloride, without monitoring, without it being indicated and in a manner which they knew would kill the child. Evidence from given at the inquest by two doctors that the death was indeed as a result of the ranitidine overdoses and potassium chloride. I support a new inquest, a police investigation independent of the Coroner and a Public Inquiry into this death. The
Death of Baby Sunaina Chaudhari Expert Report by Neelu Chaudhari (075777) Public Inquiry will investigate the current culture of multi-agency “social and medical ambush”, a cause of high death rates, unaccountability and cover-up within the National Health Service.
GIGANTIC PERVERSIONS OF BRITISH JUSTICE - A CASE FOR A SECOND INQUEST, 2001
A series of Freemason Judges' Errors Of Law decisions persecute the family for demanding Justice ... more A series of Freemason Judges' Errors Of Law decisions persecute the family for demanding Justice CHAPTER 1: Introduction-Freemason army of Judges persecute the family, for seeking justice into Sunaina's highly suspicious and sudden death, in an NHS hospital, at the hands of doctors, in British Courts. Way back, in the days of King Richard II, Old John of Gaunt, was, according to Shakespeare, obliged to cry out against injustice thus, "This land of such dear dear souls, dear land, Dear for her reputation through the world Is now leas'd out-I die pronouncing it-Like to a tenement or pelting farm". What was felt about England then, is what many of us now feel about out courts! Very few of our judges are still committed to ensure justice in our court. Many of them seem to be leasing out justice like a tenement or a pelting farm. Hence, the sum total, of this website is about the ways some of our judges, by virtue of their membership of Freemasonry, have perverted the course of justice in our dear, dear land. TO BE OR NOT TO BE When my sister Sadhana Dolly Chaudhari, a postgraduate certificated science teacher, and I, a pharmacist, found ourselves greatly afflicted by the death of baby Sunaina Chaudhari, my niece, and Chaudhari's daughter, we sought guidance from the Holy Writ. Now and then, quotations from Shakespear turned out to be very useful. For instance, to be or not to be, became the question with us. Were we to suffer the outrageous fortune brought by the killing of the five month old baby Sunaina or were we to take up arms against a sea of misfortune and by opposing them, end them? We decided to take up arms against a sea of misfortune. But what kind of arms were we to take? REPORTING OFFENCE The answer to that question was easy. The greatest philosopher, Socrates had given it. Though he had lived for the edification of mankind, yet he was sentenced to die for corrupting the youth. Although some of those who sentenced him to die wanted him to flee the country and escape death, yet, he refused to save his life saying something to the effect that, "Since I have lived by the law, it is only right that I die by the law too".
The cruelty with which Baby Sunaina was denied treatment and deliberately given wrong treatment w... more The cruelty with which Baby Sunaina was denied treatment and deliberately given wrong treatment with the intention of killing her, excites, even now, emotion, which provokes tears. From massive evidence proving (a) motive to kill, (b) gross medical negligence, (c) a number of criminal acts (d) many criminal omissions, and (e) criminal cover up, the question, "NHS MURDERS UK BABY SUNAINA" can be answered without any hesitation. Her own doctors, whose very terms and conditions of service were to save her life, killed her! By virtue of the Human Rights Act 1998, the Coroner's Act 1988 and the Criminal Law Act 1967 we are obliged to publish here, the evidence that prove that Baby Sunaina was indeed, intentionally killed. Under the Human Rights Act 1998, human life has precedence over all other rights. Hence, substantiated complaint of abuse of power of a public office, by taking away any human life, calls for intense public investigation by the Police and the Coroner etc. Section 4(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1967 makes it a mandatory duty for any person who knows that a crime has been committed, to report it for necessary investigations. Section 8 of the Coroner's Act 1988 places a duty on every person who has reason to believe that a deceased person died of unnatural causes i.e. died as a result of negligence, misconduct and unfair means, to inform the Coroner, or for that matter, the Police, of the facts and circumstances relating to the death.
We have reason to believe that Baby Sunaina died an unnatural death as a result of professional negligence, criminal misconduct and unfair means. Hence this article is a formal notice to the Coroner, the Police, the General Medical Council, the press and some public figures, of the facts and the circumstances relating to the death of Baby Sunaina. The following points of fact and of law prove, in our opinion, beyond reasonable doubt, that the life of Baby Sunaina Chaudhari (hereinafter referred to as Sunaina or Baby Sunaina) was taken away by her own doctors! Indeed, before and after her death, there was a gigantic criminal conspiracy to cover up all evidence of her killing!
About the Author by
Erick Otema Allimadi (Former Prime Minister of Uganda)
"There is nothing more... more About the Author by Erick Otema Allimadi (Former Prime Minister of Uganda) "There is nothing more natural," wrote Dr. Naphlim Akena Adoko in his book Mr. Minister, "than that a person endowed with sensibility should entertain respect and even affection towards his leaders. Yet , there is now nothing more certain than that the conduct of many people who have found themselves in position of respect and affection has been such that nobody in his senses could contemplate with approbation ." No one should thus be surpnsed that public expositions of the conduct of public officers which cannot be 'con tem plated with approbation ' have been the main mission of Dr. Adoko's life. Various newspapers in Uganda have described him as 'a thorn in the flesh ' of the corrupt elements in society' ( The Equator) , 'the torch bearer searching for inciden ces of the corrupt usage of power' (M unnansi), and as 'a person who never shrinks from describing a character , however grotesque , or an inciden t , however chilly' ( The People). While launching a book by Akena Adoko , entitled Coups and Corruptions in Africa, the Rev. Douglas Dean described Dr. Adbko as a disinterested artist who should be permitted wide latitude to expose mercilessly the disagreeable aspects of life. In that book , Adoko argues that ,in Africa today, coups are evils which have become necessary against governments headed by tyrants such as Emperor Jean-Bedel Bokassa and President Macias Nguema. He also argues that , as government is the greatest concern of aJl men , a leader who abuses the power of government should be liable to the greatest reproach . The book was such a reproach. It was not the first reproach of its kind. During President Milton Obote's second rule of Uganda, Dr. Adoko, who was then the managing director of the government-owned National Textiles Board , wrote a letter to all members of Parliament informing them that the Minister of Industry (in charge of the Textiles Board) and his own cousin , a general manager of a subsidiary company of the Board , had corruptly SH AP E\ *M ER GE FO RM AT obtained over 300 million shillings. Said Dr. Adoko, "I am the ma nager: I know the facts. I am also a lawyer: I know the law of libel." It was a bombshell. Parliamen t went into pandemoni um . Ha rdly any business was transacted that day. Notices were later given of the intention to sue for libel , although no suit was ever instituted . Adoko also brought a constitutional case against the Chief Justice of Uganda for a breach of oath of office. Withi n the month , the Chief Justice was dismissed. Af ter the fall of the Obote and the Okellos governmen ts, Dr. Adoko filed a constitutional case against the government of President Yoweri Museveni for usurping judicial functions vested in the court of law. He swore an affidavit to the effect that he had learnt 'with shame and consternation' of the withdrawal, by the Director of Public Prosecutions , of a criminal case that Dr. Adoko had instituted against a general manager of a public corporation. The case concerned the acquisition by fraud of a sum of money exceeding eight thousand million Uganda shiJlings. To Adoko, the withdrawal of that prosecution was a disgraceful abandonment of the principle that cases be withdrawn only on the basis of jutlicial consideration, and not in order to protect the accused person. The withdrawal of that case dealt a serious blow to the image and trustworthiness of the govern men t and the judiciary in the eyes of the public . Exposing abuses of power is, however, a risky job. Those exposed do not take it lying down . Dr. Adoko found himself severely criticised for the role he was alleged to have played as Chief General Service Officer during Obote's first rule. He had been responsible for the coordination of intelligence information for the use 2 of the Cabinet Security Committee of which he was secretary. He was accused of having been responsible for detentions. When Obote's first government fell, therefore, President ldi Amin appointed a Commission of Enquiry to investigate Akena Adoko and the General Service Department . Intense investigations were car ried out which completely exonerated Dr. Adoko. At that point, the Enquiry was discontinued. Furthermore, a British jury awarded Dr. Adoko a large sum in damages against an author, who, in a book , had repeated the allegation about the violation of huma n rights. The book had to be withdrawn from circulation and both its pu blishers and printers went into liquidation . In his book From Obote to Obote, Adoko has explained his role as Chief General Service Officer. He says it was a service of honour without any power of arrest , in terrogation or detention. "I never acted in the dark ," he stated. Nor was it really possible for him to act 'in the dark'. He was, at the same time, Presiden t of the Uganda Law Society and Chairman of the Uganda Professional Centre, i.e. head of the Uganda profession al association . In these capacities, he was very much involved in ensuring
the rule of law. To that end, he visited the prisons and successfully pleaded for the release of several detainees including Chief Magistrate Mpungu, advocates Dan Nabudere and Abu Mayanja , and many others. As a result of the constitutional case Dr. Adoko had instituted against the government of President Yoweri Museveni a decision was made to dismiss him from the government. But, there was no way of doing so without creating a worse scandal. Ultimately it was resolved that the National Textiles Board, managed by Adoko , be wound up. One sentence to that effect was inserted in the budget speech. Shortly afterwards, the Adoko family was chased out of their own house by the police, who threatened them with detention on suspicion of sympathisi ng with guerrillas. Much against their will, they were obliged to seek political asylum outside their motherland . As Dr. Adoko is a Bri tish-trained barrister , and his wife is a British-trained State Registered Nurse and Sick Children'sNurse,theycame toexileinBritainwheretheirqualificationsentitle them to earn their livelihood. While they were here , the Museveni govern ment exonerated the General Service Department of allegations of human rights violations. Ihave known Dr. Adoko since February 1960. He is a man who believes passionately that reason should be accorded supreme importance in the conduct of public affairs. In this book , he contends that, in the Jeffrey Archer libel case, reason was not given its due place in Justice Caulfield summing up to the jury . That is the theme of the book. A ll that constitutes an enchanting epic poem is to be found in the book: concealment, recognition revela tion , vicissitudes, and surprise upon surprise. No wonder therefore that the account brings a lump to the throat. As may be expected from an author who is a Papal Knight , the book is sprinkled with biblical quotations . (Dr. Adoko is a Papal Knight of Saint Gregory the Great.) Those of us who are close to him affectionately call him 'Sir Naph' .
is a Papal Knight of Saint Gregory the Great. He was President of the Uganda Law Society. He is a... more is a Papal Knight of Saint Gregory the Great. He was President of the Uganda Law Society. He is an American educated Social-Anthropologist with a Master and Doctorate degrees in comparative law. He is also an English trained Barrister but has voluntarily opted to have himself disbarred in order to expose corruption within the public service. Ten years ago, he wrote a book on the Jeffrey Archer Scandal. It exposed mercilessly the charges for which Lord Archer has now been prosecuted.
Uploads
Papers by lou lotus
The Commission is of the view that there is a necessity of an independent authority to enquire into the true and real cause of death of a person, even if such person dies outside the territorial limits of the country.
Accordingly, a draft Bill has been appended and annexed to this Report as Annex.
Death of Baby Sunaina Chaudhari Expert Report by Neelu Chaudhari (075777)
Public Inquiry will investigate the current culture of multi-agency “social and medical ambush”, a cause of high death rates, unaccountability and cover-up within the National Health Service.
By virtue of the Human Rights Act 1998, the Coroner's Act 1988 and the Criminal Law Act 1967 we are obliged to publish here, the evidence that prove that Baby Sunaina was indeed, intentionally killed.
Under the Human Rights Act 1998, human life has precedence over all other rights. Hence, substantiated complaint of abuse of power of a public office, by taking away any human life, calls for intense public investigation by the Police and the Coroner etc.
Section 4(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1967 makes it a mandatory duty for any person who knows that a crime has been committed, to report it for necessary investigations.
Section 8 of the Coroner's Act 1988 places a duty on every person who has reason to believe that a deceased person died of unnatural causes i.e. died as a result of negligence, misconduct and unfair means, to inform the Coroner, or for that matter, the Police, of the facts and circumstances relating to the death.
We have reason to believe that Baby Sunaina died an unnatural death as a result of professional negligence, criminal misconduct and unfair means. Hence this article is a formal notice to the Coroner, the Police, the General Medical Council, the press and some public figures, of the facts and the circumstances relating to the death of Baby Sunaina.
The following points of fact and of law prove, in our opinion, beyond reasonable doubt, that the life of Baby Sunaina Chaudhari (hereinafter referred to as Sunaina or Baby Sunaina) was taken away by her own doctors! Indeed, before and after her death, there was a gigantic criminal conspiracy to cover up all evidence of her killing!
Erick Otema Allimadi (Former Prime Minister of Uganda)
"There is nothing more natural," wrote Dr. Naphlim Akena Adoko in his book Mr. Minister, "than that a person endowed with sensibility should entertain respect and even affection towards his leaders. Yet , there is now nothing more certain than that the conduct of many people who have found themselves in position of respect and affection has been such that nobody in his senses could contemplate with approbation ." No one should thus be surpnsed that public expositions of the conduct of public officers which cannot be 'con tem plated with approbation ' have been the main mission of Dr. Adoko's life.
Various newspapers in Uganda have described him as 'a thorn in the flesh ' of the corrupt elements in society' ( The Equator) , 'the torch bearer searching for inciden ces of the corrupt usage of power' (M unnansi), and as 'a person who never shrinks from describing a character , however grotesque , or an inciden t , however chilly' ( The People).
While launching a book by Akena Adoko , entitled Coups and Corruptions in Africa, the Rev. Douglas Dean described Dr. Adbko as a disinterested artist who should be permitted wide latitude to expose mercilessly the disagreeable aspects of life. In that book , Adoko argues that ,in Africa today, coups are evils which have become necessary against governments headed by tyrants such as Emperor Jean-Bedel Bokassa and President Macias Nguema. He also argues that , as government is the greatest concern of aJl men , a leader who abuses the power of government should be liable to the greatest reproach . The book was such a reproach. It was not the first reproach of its kind.
During President Milton Obote's second rule of Uganda, Dr. Adoko, who was then the managing director of the government-owned National Textiles Board , wrote a letter to all members of Parliament informing them that the Minister of Industry (in charge of the Textiles Board) and his own cousin , a general manager of a subsidiary company of the Board , had corruptly
SH AP E\ *M ER GE FO RM AT
obtained over 300 million shillings. Said Dr. Adoko, "I am the ma nager: I know the facts. I am also a lawyer: I know the law of libel." It was a bombshell. Parliamen t went into pandemoni um . Ha rdly any business was transacted that day. Notices were later given of the intention to sue for libel , although no suit was ever instituted .
Adoko also brought a constitutional case against the Chief Justice of Uganda for a breach of oath of office. Withi n the month , the Chief Justice was dismissed.
Af ter the fall of the Obote and the Okellos governmen ts, Dr. Adoko filed a constitutional case against the government of President Yoweri Museveni for usurping judicial functions vested in the court of law. He swore an affidavit to the effect that he had learnt 'with shame and consternation' of the withdrawal, by the Director of Public Prosecutions , of a criminal case that Dr. Adoko had instituted against a general manager of a public corporation. The case concerned the acquisition by fraud of a sum of money exceeding eight thousand million Uganda shiJlings. To Adoko, the withdrawal of that prosecution was a disgraceful abandonment of the principle that cases be withdrawn only on the basis of jutlicial consideration, and not in order to protect the accused person. The withdrawal of that case dealt a serious blow to the image and trustworthiness of the govern men t and the judiciary in the eyes of the public .
Exposing abuses of power is, however, a risky job. Those exposed do not take it lying down . Dr. Adoko found himself severely criticised for the role he was alleged to have played as Chief General Service Officer during Obote's first rule. He had been responsible for the coordination of intelligence information for the use
2
of the Cabinet Security Committee of which he was secretary. He was accused of having been responsible for detentions. When Obote's first government fell, therefore, President ldi Amin appointed a Commission of Enquiry to investigate Akena Adoko and the General Service Department . Intense investigations were car ried out which completely exonerated Dr. Adoko. At that point, the Enquiry was discontinued. Furthermore, a British jury awarded Dr. Adoko a large sum in damages against an author, who, in a book , had repeated the allegation about the violation of huma n rights. The book had to be withdrawn from circulation and both its pu blishers and printers went into liquidation .
In his book From Obote to Obote, Adoko has explained his role as Chief General Service Officer. He says it was a service of honour without any power of arrest , in terrogation or detention. "I never acted in the dark ," he stated. Nor was it really possible for him to act 'in the dark'. He was, at the same time, Presiden t of the Uganda Law Society and Chairman of the Uganda Professional Centre, i.e. head of the Uganda profession al association . In these capacities, he was very much involved in ensuring
the rule of law. To that end, he visited the prisons and successfully pleaded for the release of several detainees including Chief Magistrate Mpungu, advocates Dan Nabudere and Abu Mayanja , and many others.
As a result of the constitutional case Dr. Adoko had instituted against the government of President Yoweri Museveni a decision was made to dismiss him from the government. But, there was no way of doing so without creating a worse scandal. Ultimately it was resolved that the National Textiles Board, managed by Adoko , be wound up. One sentence to that effect was inserted in the budget speech. Shortly afterwards, the Adoko family was chased out of their own house by the police, who threatened them with detention on suspicion of sympathisi ng with guerrillas. Much against their will, they were obliged to seek political asylum outside their motherland . As Dr. Adoko is a Bri tish-trained
barrister , and his wife is a British-trained State Registered Nurse and Sick Children'sNurse,theycame toexileinBritainwheretheirqualificationsentitle them to earn their livelihood. While they were here , the Museveni govern ment exonerated the General Service Department of allegations of human rights violations.
Ihave known Dr. Adoko since February 1960. He is a man who believes passionately that reason should be accorded supreme importance in the conduct of public affairs. In this book , he contends that, in the Jeffrey Archer libel case, reason was not given its due place in Justice Caulfield summing up to the jury . That is the theme of the book.
A ll that constitutes an enchanting epic poem is to be found in the book: concealment, recognition revela tion , vicissitudes, and surprise upon surprise. No wonder therefore that the account brings a lump to the throat.
As may be expected from an author who is a Papal Knight , the book is sprinkled with biblical quotations . (Dr. Adoko is a Papal Knight of Saint Gregory the Great.) Those of us who are close to him affectionately call him 'Sir Naph' .
The Commission is of the view that there is a necessity of an independent authority to enquire into the true and real cause of death of a person, even if such person dies outside the territorial limits of the country.
Accordingly, a draft Bill has been appended and annexed to this Report as Annex.
Death of Baby Sunaina Chaudhari Expert Report by Neelu Chaudhari (075777)
Public Inquiry will investigate the current culture of multi-agency “social and medical ambush”, a cause of high death rates, unaccountability and cover-up within the National Health Service.
By virtue of the Human Rights Act 1998, the Coroner's Act 1988 and the Criminal Law Act 1967 we are obliged to publish here, the evidence that prove that Baby Sunaina was indeed, intentionally killed.
Under the Human Rights Act 1998, human life has precedence over all other rights. Hence, substantiated complaint of abuse of power of a public office, by taking away any human life, calls for intense public investigation by the Police and the Coroner etc.
Section 4(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1967 makes it a mandatory duty for any person who knows that a crime has been committed, to report it for necessary investigations.
Section 8 of the Coroner's Act 1988 places a duty on every person who has reason to believe that a deceased person died of unnatural causes i.e. died as a result of negligence, misconduct and unfair means, to inform the Coroner, or for that matter, the Police, of the facts and circumstances relating to the death.
We have reason to believe that Baby Sunaina died an unnatural death as a result of professional negligence, criminal misconduct and unfair means. Hence this article is a formal notice to the Coroner, the Police, the General Medical Council, the press and some public figures, of the facts and the circumstances relating to the death of Baby Sunaina.
The following points of fact and of law prove, in our opinion, beyond reasonable doubt, that the life of Baby Sunaina Chaudhari (hereinafter referred to as Sunaina or Baby Sunaina) was taken away by her own doctors! Indeed, before and after her death, there was a gigantic criminal conspiracy to cover up all evidence of her killing!
Erick Otema Allimadi (Former Prime Minister of Uganda)
"There is nothing more natural," wrote Dr. Naphlim Akena Adoko in his book Mr. Minister, "than that a person endowed with sensibility should entertain respect and even affection towards his leaders. Yet , there is now nothing more certain than that the conduct of many people who have found themselves in position of respect and affection has been such that nobody in his senses could contemplate with approbation ." No one should thus be surpnsed that public expositions of the conduct of public officers which cannot be 'con tem plated with approbation ' have been the main mission of Dr. Adoko's life.
Various newspapers in Uganda have described him as 'a thorn in the flesh ' of the corrupt elements in society' ( The Equator) , 'the torch bearer searching for inciden ces of the corrupt usage of power' (M unnansi), and as 'a person who never shrinks from describing a character , however grotesque , or an inciden t , however chilly' ( The People).
While launching a book by Akena Adoko , entitled Coups and Corruptions in Africa, the Rev. Douglas Dean described Dr. Adbko as a disinterested artist who should be permitted wide latitude to expose mercilessly the disagreeable aspects of life. In that book , Adoko argues that ,in Africa today, coups are evils which have become necessary against governments headed by tyrants such as Emperor Jean-Bedel Bokassa and President Macias Nguema. He also argues that , as government is the greatest concern of aJl men , a leader who abuses the power of government should be liable to the greatest reproach . The book was such a reproach. It was not the first reproach of its kind.
During President Milton Obote's second rule of Uganda, Dr. Adoko, who was then the managing director of the government-owned National Textiles Board , wrote a letter to all members of Parliament informing them that the Minister of Industry (in charge of the Textiles Board) and his own cousin , a general manager of a subsidiary company of the Board , had corruptly
SH AP E\ *M ER GE FO RM AT
obtained over 300 million shillings. Said Dr. Adoko, "I am the ma nager: I know the facts. I am also a lawyer: I know the law of libel." It was a bombshell. Parliamen t went into pandemoni um . Ha rdly any business was transacted that day. Notices were later given of the intention to sue for libel , although no suit was ever instituted .
Adoko also brought a constitutional case against the Chief Justice of Uganda for a breach of oath of office. Withi n the month , the Chief Justice was dismissed.
Af ter the fall of the Obote and the Okellos governmen ts, Dr. Adoko filed a constitutional case against the government of President Yoweri Museveni for usurping judicial functions vested in the court of law. He swore an affidavit to the effect that he had learnt 'with shame and consternation' of the withdrawal, by the Director of Public Prosecutions , of a criminal case that Dr. Adoko had instituted against a general manager of a public corporation. The case concerned the acquisition by fraud of a sum of money exceeding eight thousand million Uganda shiJlings. To Adoko, the withdrawal of that prosecution was a disgraceful abandonment of the principle that cases be withdrawn only on the basis of jutlicial consideration, and not in order to protect the accused person. The withdrawal of that case dealt a serious blow to the image and trustworthiness of the govern men t and the judiciary in the eyes of the public .
Exposing abuses of power is, however, a risky job. Those exposed do not take it lying down . Dr. Adoko found himself severely criticised for the role he was alleged to have played as Chief General Service Officer during Obote's first rule. He had been responsible for the coordination of intelligence information for the use
2
of the Cabinet Security Committee of which he was secretary. He was accused of having been responsible for detentions. When Obote's first government fell, therefore, President ldi Amin appointed a Commission of Enquiry to investigate Akena Adoko and the General Service Department . Intense investigations were car ried out which completely exonerated Dr. Adoko. At that point, the Enquiry was discontinued. Furthermore, a British jury awarded Dr. Adoko a large sum in damages against an author, who, in a book , had repeated the allegation about the violation of huma n rights. The book had to be withdrawn from circulation and both its pu blishers and printers went into liquidation .
In his book From Obote to Obote, Adoko has explained his role as Chief General Service Officer. He says it was a service of honour without any power of arrest , in terrogation or detention. "I never acted in the dark ," he stated. Nor was it really possible for him to act 'in the dark'. He was, at the same time, Presiden t of the Uganda Law Society and Chairman of the Uganda Professional Centre, i.e. head of the Uganda profession al association . In these capacities, he was very much involved in ensuring
the rule of law. To that end, he visited the prisons and successfully pleaded for the release of several detainees including Chief Magistrate Mpungu, advocates Dan Nabudere and Abu Mayanja , and many others.
As a result of the constitutional case Dr. Adoko had instituted against the government of President Yoweri Museveni a decision was made to dismiss him from the government. But, there was no way of doing so without creating a worse scandal. Ultimately it was resolved that the National Textiles Board, managed by Adoko , be wound up. One sentence to that effect was inserted in the budget speech. Shortly afterwards, the Adoko family was chased out of their own house by the police, who threatened them with detention on suspicion of sympathisi ng with guerrillas. Much against their will, they were obliged to seek political asylum outside their motherland . As Dr. Adoko is a Bri tish-trained
barrister , and his wife is a British-trained State Registered Nurse and Sick Children'sNurse,theycame toexileinBritainwheretheirqualificationsentitle them to earn their livelihood. While they were here , the Museveni govern ment exonerated the General Service Department of allegations of human rights violations.
Ihave known Dr. Adoko since February 1960. He is a man who believes passionately that reason should be accorded supreme importance in the conduct of public affairs. In this book , he contends that, in the Jeffrey Archer libel case, reason was not given its due place in Justice Caulfield summing up to the jury . That is the theme of the book.
A ll that constitutes an enchanting epic poem is to be found in the book: concealment, recognition revela tion , vicissitudes, and surprise upon surprise. No wonder therefore that the account brings a lump to the throat.
As may be expected from an author who is a Papal Knight , the book is sprinkled with biblical quotations . (Dr. Adoko is a Papal Knight of Saint Gregory the Great.) Those of us who are close to him affectionately call him 'Sir Naph' .