Jonathan Lipps
Related Authors
Rosie Perera
Regent College, Vancouver, BC
Lyndsey Graves
Boston University
Marius Dorobanțu
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Gareth Clegg
Regent College, Vancouver, BC
Michael S Northcott
Universitas Gadjah Mada (Yogyakarta)
Levi Checketts
Hong Kong Baptist University
Peter M Scott
The University of Manchester
Douglas Estes
Friends University
Andrew Feenberg
Simon Fraser University
InterestsView All (10)
Uploads
Papers by Jonathan Lipps
Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) is a phenomenon in the field of Information & Computer Technology that has social, legal, technological, and business descriptions and implications. The technological artifacts of FOSS, being computer programs, are intuitively to be classed as devices, though there are exceptions. More interesting is considering whether FOSS itself is a meta-device, according to the Device Paradigm.
The diversity of kinds of participation in FOSS is waning in favor of a certain kind of use---that of professional, for-profit consumers and contributors. When observing FOSS from this lens, we see that the goal is precisely that of "availability". We can then predict, on Borgmann's theory of technology, that certain effects of this "deviceification" should be observable in the arena of FOSS, e.g., obscurity or obfuscation of the functional inner workings of software artifacts with a concomitant user-friendliness that encourages an orientation of consumption or sheer use, and discourages participation in the inner workings of FOSS artifacts and governance.
Thus we can identify an ironic tension between the stated goals of many FOSS adherents on the one hand, e.g., an openness in code and organization structure, and the pressure towards availability on the other hand (which involves minimizing burdens for the user).
Drafts by Jonathan Lipps
Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) is a phenomenon in the field of Information & Computer Technology that has social, legal, technological, and business descriptions and implications. The technological artifacts of FOSS, being computer programs, are intuitively to be classed as devices, though there are exceptions. More interesting is considering whether FOSS itself is a meta-device, according to the Device Paradigm.
The diversity of kinds of participation in FOSS is waning in favor of a certain kind of use---that of professional, for-profit consumers and contributors. When observing FOSS from this lens, we see that the goal is precisely that of "availability". We can then predict, on Borgmann's theory of technology, that certain effects of this "deviceification" should be observable in the arena of FOSS, e.g., obscurity or obfuscation of the functional inner workings of software artifacts with a concomitant user-friendliness that encourages an orientation of consumption or sheer use, and discourages participation in the inner workings of FOSS artifacts and governance.
Thus we can identify an ironic tension between the stated goals of many FOSS adherents on the one hand, e.g., an openness in code and organization structure, and the pressure towards availability on the other hand (which involves minimizing burdens for the user).