
Roger Williams
Phone: 001-614-688-4061
Address: School of Environment and Natural Resources
367-C Kottman Hall
2021 Coffey Road
The Ohio State University
Columbus, OH 43210 USA
Address: School of Environment and Natural Resources
367-C Kottman Hall
2021 Coffey Road
The Ohio State University
Columbus, OH 43210 USA
less
Related Authors
Jana Javornik
University of East London
Armando Marques-Guedes
UNL - New University of Lisbon
Gwen Robbins Schug
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Kevin Arbuckle
Swansea University
Rainer W Bussmann
Ilia State University
Jesper Hoffmeyer
University of Copenhagen
Richard Cloutier
Université du Québec à Rimouski
ABHAYA P Das
North Bengal University
Timothy Morton
Rice University
Nicola Lupo
LUISS Guido Carli
InterestsView All (7)
Uploads
Papers by Roger Williams
for this study. Two plantations were tapped for resin production and three plantations had not been tapped. Eight sample trees were selected
from each of three sample plots randomly established in each plantation. Tree cores were extracted at 1.3m on each sample tree for the purpose of
measuring tree ring width to establish radial growth. Tree cores were sanded with fine grain sandpaper and measured to the nearest 0.5mm with
the aid of a 10x magnification scope. Some cores had to be eliminated from the sample due to poor quality, and ultimately 24 cores from tapped
trees and 24 cores from untapped trees were used for analysis. The mean radial growth of tapped trees (4.4712mm) and untapped trees (4.3537)
were found to be not significantly different (p=0.05). Models were developed to display the cumulative radial growth of trees, and the 95%
confidence bounds about the model coefficients suggest there is no significant difference in the cumulative radial growth of tapped and untapped
trees. While our results would suggest that there is no impact of tapping trees for resin on diameter radial growth, this might be misleading. We
sampled only at 1.3m and it is possible that had we sampled at 3.0m we might have recorded a negative effect. The “non-effect” we recorded at
1.3m may actually have been a positive effect. There could have been an increase in the radial growth due to the wood formation in the uninjured
side of the tree, but was not significantly greater than that of untapped trees. Implications of this finding are discussed.
for this study. Two plantations were tapped for resin production and three plantations had not been tapped. Eight sample trees were selected
from each of three sample plots randomly established in each plantation. Tree cores were extracted at 1.3m on each sample tree for the purpose of
measuring tree ring width to establish radial growth. Tree cores were sanded with fine grain sandpaper and measured to the nearest 0.5mm with
the aid of a 10x magnification scope. Some cores had to be eliminated from the sample due to poor quality, and ultimately 24 cores from tapped
trees and 24 cores from untapped trees were used for analysis. The mean radial growth of tapped trees (4.4712mm) and untapped trees (4.3537)
were found to be not significantly different (p=0.05). Models were developed to display the cumulative radial growth of trees, and the 95%
confidence bounds about the model coefficients suggest there is no significant difference in the cumulative radial growth of tapped and untapped
trees. While our results would suggest that there is no impact of tapping trees for resin on diameter radial growth, this might be misleading. We
sampled only at 1.3m and it is possible that had we sampled at 3.0m we might have recorded a negative effect. The “non-effect” we recorded at
1.3m may actually have been a positive effect. There could have been an increase in the radial growth due to the wood formation in the uninjured
side of the tree, but was not significantly greater than that of untapped trees. Implications of this finding are discussed.