Renaissance Mural Paintings in St. Wenceslas’ Church in Moravská Ostrava The wall paintings in the St. Wenceslas town church of Moravská Ostrava were discovered by restorers in 1963 and their contemporary appearance represents the result...
moreRenaissance Mural Paintings in St. Wenceslas’ Church in Moravská Ostrava
The wall paintings in the St. Wenceslas town church of Moravská Ostrava were discovered by restorers in 1963 and their contemporary appearance represents the result of relatively frequent acts of restoration.
The interior of the town church was decorated in 1555 with wall paintings of a quality which does not exceed the regional relevance of the monument. The state of the paintings does not allow proper stylistic analysis, and unfortunately only very general conclusions in the area of hypothesis. In spite of these circumstances we can however refute a theory ascribing authorship to some of the Italian artists working in the 1530’s for the aristocratic family of Sedlničtí from Choltice in Polish Ostrava. The stylistic character of the paintings in the presbytery, almost certainly created during the 1530’s, demonstrates a more plausible artistic relationship to German countries or Silesia, though this statement cannot be verified further.
The paintings in the presbytery and also in the church naves can, from the point of view of quality be considered average or below average. The painting of the best quality is the Adoration of the Magi with its monumental three-plan composition probably inspired by Dutch and German graphic art. The understanding of landscape in the Ostrava paintings (Adoration of the Magi; Meeting of the Three Magi and their Retinues; Allegory of the Old and New Testaments and of Sin and Salvation) is however very schematic and really still medieval, dividing the landscape into individual plans with a use of atmospheric perspective. This approach can be regarded as very conservative for the mid-16th century, as if without deeper interest in the study of natural detail and with resignation towards a more sophisticated expression of special relationships. Landscape is still regarded here in the medieval sense as a “stage set” where the action takes place, as can be seen, for example, in the allegory painting in the church’s north nave though our judgment can be partly distorted by the poor condition or the absence of the top layers of the paintings.
The interior of the church was decorated by a narrative Christological cycle (of unknown scope). Its part also contained a passion cycle. From the entire cycle only two monumental paintings survive till today – the Adoration of the Magi, the continuing scene of their retinues on the side wall and the fragment of painting depicting Christ before Pilate.
Paintings on other parts of the walls are sadly almost unreadable so it is impossible to distinguish precisely their iconographic meaning.
From the iconographical point of view the most interesting and also best preserved is a monumental painting on the facing wall of the north nave which represents the visual pendant of the Adoration of the Magi. It is an allegory of the Old and New Testaments and of Sin and Salvation. The iconography of the painting was inspired by the Lutheran iconography of the Law and the Gospel illustrating Martin Luther’s doctrine of justification by faith alone in Christ. However, the Ostrava painting varies greatly from the original Lucas Cranach iconography of this theme. The scenes of manna falling from heaven and Moses smiting the rock bringing forth a spring, the Virgin Mary with Child and Hell in the form of a Leviathan’s maw have been added here. Also, motifs adopted from the Law and the Gospel are not in logical order as the author of the iconographic conception of the painting would not have understood or have been familiar with the original theological idea of this theme. This fact is also expressed by the artistic uncertainty of the painter noticeable in the scene of the sinful man with John the Baptist, probably painted without any graphic model or other kind of exemplum. There is also the marked absence of a Crucifixion from the Ostrava allegory. We can only hypothetically assume its presence on the crown of the Tree of Life as compositional opposition to Moses with the Tables of Law who represents the dominant motive of the entire visual representation of the allegory. One can argue that the painting expresses the Utraquist understanding of the sacrament of the Eucharist especially through the use of the motifs of manna falling from Heaven and Moses bringing forth the spring as Old Testament pre-figurations of both elements of the sacrament, together with the scene of John the Baptist and the sinner on to whom the spring of Christ’s blood, the source of salvation is flowing. The blood which flowed from Christ’s side while he was on the cross is the same which Christians receive in the form of consecrated wine during the sacrament of the Eucharist. If this scene can also be interpreted as a representation of the doctrine of transubstantiation with regard to iconographic analogies with the Law and the Gospel and Luther’s opinions on the Eucharist we presume as questionable also the entire idea of the painting itself which, it could be argued, does not represent Lutheran Law and Gospel though it was nevertheless inspired by it. On the contrary, the figure of Moses (representing lex Mose) together with Old Testament scenes understood in the sense of biblical parallel typology seem to be more suited to the traditional spirit of Czech Utraquism albeit expressed in such a way that believers of all creeds entering a town church where both liturgies, Catholic as well as sub utraque were served, could feel free to express their devotion.
The author of the iconographic conception of the Ostrava allegory can be identified as the Ostravian Catholic priest Jan Jilovský who was known to have served the local aristocracy sub utraque specie. For the conception of the painting he derived his inspiration from the Lutheran theme Law and Gospel which, however, he enriched with other motifs in a very original way. Jilovský could have come into contact with such a Lutheran representation in Bohemia (we know of only one such representation of this theme in Moravia which was from a later period) or, more likely, in neighboring Silesia where this theme was used on Protestant bourgeois epitaphs. Furthermore, we know that the town of Moravská Ostrava maintained frequent business contact with the Polish Těšínsko region which in the mid-16th century was already completely Lutheran.
Such a derivated iconography of the allegory inspired by the Law and the Gospel might well have been a result of the priest Jilovský’s poor theological knowledge and also of the chaos of orthodoxy which manifested itself in this case in a chaotic assimilation of new theological ideas or their misunderstanding. Jilovský would certainly seem to have been one of those “confused and married” priests about whom the Olomouc bishop Marek Khuen complained in his letter of 1561 “during the holy masses do not keep any ceremonies, and sacraments do not keep at churches as anyone preaches as he or the land lord likes and all these are hiding themselves under the sub utraque way…” Therefore it is also possible that the Ostravian allegory may be primarily expressing, under the veil of sub utraque, the Lutheran idea of justification only by faith, though in a way that would not be too obvious in a bishopric church and accompanied by traditional Catholic iconography (like the Man of Sorrows and Our Lady of Sorrows) and such an iconographical presentation was suitable for the ostravian bourgeois as well as for the aristocracy - of Catholic as well as of Utraquist and Lutheran creeds. If the paintings were really painted over at a later stage as is evident from the restoration investigations, this was certainly not done because of any potential heretical content in the painting but rather for technical or aesthetic reasons (for example, the humidity of the church walls due to which they were regarded as unsuitable for artistic decoration), otherwise similar themes would not have been met in a purely Catholic environment where additionally we would assume a certain level of quality theological fundament - in the Dominican monastery of České Budějovice, for example.
The iconographical conception of the decoration in the interior of St. Wenceslas’ church is traditional. Yet it cannot be regarded as purely Catholic in view of the presence of Utraquist symbolism and inspiration by Lutheran iconography in the allegory of the north church nave that must be regarded as unique in context of Czech, Moravian (and also Silesian) art of the 16th century. The allegory is not polemic even through its Utraquist Eucharistic symbolism and therefore it represents rare evidence in the field of Fine Arts of not only the religious chaos and orthodox vagueness but also religious coexistence and tolerance “by necessity” in the Moravia of the 16th century that had already been appreciated by contemporaries.