
Neil Bernstein
Address: 210 Ellis Hall
Athens OH 45701
USA
Athens OH 45701
USA
less
Related Authors
Robert Cowan
The University of Sydney
John Sellars
Royal Holloway, University of London
Richard P Martin
Stanford University
Thomas Biggs
University of St Andrews
Liana Lomiento
Università di Urbino "Carlo Bo"
William M Short
University of Exeter
Mirko Canevaro
University of Edinburgh
Darcy A Krasne
Columbia University
Armando Marques-Guedes
UNL - New University of Lisbon
Giulia Sissa
Ucla
InterestsView All (23)
Uploads
Books by Neil Bernstein
Juxtaposes the full Latin text with an accessible English translation and extensive contextualizing introduction
Provides comprehensive detail in a keenly focused line-by-line commentary
Expands greatly on previous critical editions of the entire poem to offer an invaluable up-to-date resource
Ethics, Identity, and Community in Later Roman Declamation is the first book devoted exclusively to the Major Declamations and its reception in later European literature. It argues that the fictional scenarios of the Major Declamations enable the conceptual exploration of a variety of ethical and social issues. These include the construction of authority (Chapter 1), the verification of claims (Chapter 2), the conventions of reciprocity (Chapter 3), and the ethics of spectatorship (Chapter 4). Chapter 5 presents a study of the reception of the collection by the Renaissance humanist Juan Luis Vives and the eighteenth century scholar Lorenzo Patarol. A brief postscript surveys the use of declamatory exercises in the contemporary university and will inform current work in rhetorical studies.
Papers by Neil Bernstein
Juxtaposes the full Latin text with an accessible English translation and extensive contextualizing introduction
Provides comprehensive detail in a keenly focused line-by-line commentary
Expands greatly on previous critical editions of the entire poem to offer an invaluable up-to-date resource
Ethics, Identity, and Community in Later Roman Declamation is the first book devoted exclusively to the Major Declamations and its reception in later European literature. It argues that the fictional scenarios of the Major Declamations enable the conceptual exploration of a variety of ethical and social issues. These include the construction of authority (Chapter 1), the verification of claims (Chapter 2), the conventions of reciprocity (Chapter 3), and the ethics of spectatorship (Chapter 4). Chapter 5 presents a study of the reception of the collection by the Renaissance humanist Juan Luis Vives and the eighteenth century scholar Lorenzo Patarol. A brief postscript surveys the use of declamatory exercises in the contemporary university and will inform current work in rhetorical studies.
a) Tesserae facilitates tracing the evolution of common phrases across the corpus. The user may quantify the rates of adaptation of a phrase, alteration of its morphological forms, or substitution of synonyms. The commentator may now evaluate the use of a common phrase in terms of its evolutionary history rather than simply noting it as a “typical” parallel (Gibson 2002). b) As Tesserae generates the total set of instances of phrase reuse, rates of frequency and density of reuse of given predecessors’ texts can easily be determined. Patterns of text reuse in a particular span of text may thus be compared to typical rates of reuse within the poem as a whole. While interpretive judgments of the significance of allusion remains the commentator’s subjective task (Farrell 2005), Tesserae can be used to highlight exceptionally “dense” passages of text reuse.
Allusions in passages of Latin poetry have been traditionally understood as a series of points of conceptual contact between texts. They may also be quantified in terms of their degree of variation from the poet’s typical allusive practice. The ability to generate a large volume of instances of interpretable intertextual data accordingly shifts the discussion of intertextuality from the local and subjective to the global and quantitative.
Works cited
Coffee, N., J.-P. Koenig, S. Poornima, R. Ossewaarde, C. Forstall, and S. Jacobson. “The Tesserae Project: Intertextual Analysis of Latin Poetry.” (2012). Literary and Linguistic Computing. doi: 10.1093/llc/fqs033.
Farrell, J. 2005. Intention and intertext. Phoenix 59: 98-111.
Gibson, R. K. 2002. 'Cf. e.g.': A Typology of 'Parallels' and the Role of Commentaries on Latin Poetry. In R. K. Gibson & C. S. Kraus (eds.), The classical commentary: histories, practices, theory (pp. 331-358). Leiden: Brill.