
Ann Pellegrini
Related Authors
Avgi Saketopoulou
New York University
Nicolas Evzonas
University of Paris
Bogdan Popa
Transilvania Brasov
Tim Dean
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Fionn Murtagh
University of Huddersfield
Christopher Bell
University of Dallas
Laura A. Cariola
University of Edinburgh
Victoria Browne
Loughborough University
Uploads
Papers by Ann Pellegrini
feminist studies – and beyond. The turn to affect is also a re-turn, with
contemporary studies of affect drawing across rich earlier studies of
emotion, feelings and sentiment. This article is less interested in offering
a long history of affect studies than it is in asking: Why affect? Why now?
As a provisional response this article situates the so-called ‘‘affective turn’’ (to use sociologist Patricia Clough’s term) in relation to the anxiety that secularists, including and especially secular intellectuals in the US academy, have had at the resurgence of religion post-1979. This anxiety, I suggest, formed in response not just to any religion, but to religion understood as ‘‘fundamentalist’’: 1979 is the date of the Iranian revolution, and also marks the emergence or re-emergence of a certain kind of US Christian fundamentalism. Jerry Falwell names his ‘‘Moral Majority’’ as such in 1979. These twinned emergences have shaken the epistemological foundations of large segments of the US academy for whom secularism has been and remains a kind of guiding sentiment. This article goes on to consider the political and epistemological stakes of the secular academy’s disidentification not just with religion, but feelings coded as ‘‘religious.’’ Rather than reject the allegedly contaminating affects of religious feelings, this article argues, scholars of gender and sexuality studies might profit from considering the places where religious and secular feelings ‘‘touch.’’ The case study for this analysis is Hell Houses, Evangelical theatrical performances that seek to scare young people to Jesus.
the Freud family run on an endless loop. Entitled Freud: 1930–1939,
the movies are narrated by Anna Freud, who oversaw their compilation
and editing during the last two years of her life. Within these ostensibly
“private” scenes of the Freud family, the family dogs assume a surprisingly central role. This essay argues that the focus on the dogs becomes a way to narrate and narrate around traumatic loss. For the Freuds these traumatic losses involved their forced exile to London, in 1938, as well as the later deaths of four of Freud’s sisters in concentration camps. In combination, the flickering images from 1930–1939 and Anna Freud’s voiceover—recorded some fifty years later—generate an elliptical and asynchronous accounting of loss. In addition to offering an intimate
glimpse of the Freud family, the home movies thus raise broader questions about the temporality of witness and how we can see and hear the pain of the other. As one way into these questions, the essay reads with and against Sigmund Freud’s account of repetition compulsion and the management of loss in Beyond the Pleasure Principle.
[Pub. in American Imago 6.2 (2009): 231-51.]
feminist studies – and beyond. The turn to affect is also a re-turn, with
contemporary studies of affect drawing across rich earlier studies of
emotion, feelings and sentiment. This article is less interested in offering
a long history of affect studies than it is in asking: Why affect? Why now?
As a provisional response this article situates the so-called ‘‘affective turn’’ (to use sociologist Patricia Clough’s term) in relation to the anxiety that secularists, including and especially secular intellectuals in the US academy, have had at the resurgence of religion post-1979. This anxiety, I suggest, formed in response not just to any religion, but to religion understood as ‘‘fundamentalist’’: 1979 is the date of the Iranian revolution, and also marks the emergence or re-emergence of a certain kind of US Christian fundamentalism. Jerry Falwell names his ‘‘Moral Majority’’ as such in 1979. These twinned emergences have shaken the epistemological foundations of large segments of the US academy for whom secularism has been and remains a kind of guiding sentiment. This article goes on to consider the political and epistemological stakes of the secular academy’s disidentification not just with religion, but feelings coded as ‘‘religious.’’ Rather than reject the allegedly contaminating affects of religious feelings, this article argues, scholars of gender and sexuality studies might profit from considering the places where religious and secular feelings ‘‘touch.’’ The case study for this analysis is Hell Houses, Evangelical theatrical performances that seek to scare young people to Jesus.
the Freud family run on an endless loop. Entitled Freud: 1930–1939,
the movies are narrated by Anna Freud, who oversaw their compilation
and editing during the last two years of her life. Within these ostensibly
“private” scenes of the Freud family, the family dogs assume a surprisingly central role. This essay argues that the focus on the dogs becomes a way to narrate and narrate around traumatic loss. For the Freuds these traumatic losses involved their forced exile to London, in 1938, as well as the later deaths of four of Freud’s sisters in concentration camps. In combination, the flickering images from 1930–1939 and Anna Freud’s voiceover—recorded some fifty years later—generate an elliptical and asynchronous accounting of loss. In addition to offering an intimate
glimpse of the Freud family, the home movies thus raise broader questions about the temporality of witness and how we can see and hear the pain of the other. As one way into these questions, the essay reads with and against Sigmund Freud’s account of repetition compulsion and the management of loss in Beyond the Pleasure Principle.
[Pub. in American Imago 6.2 (2009): 231-51.]