
Goran Guska
Related Authors
Константин Драгаш
Institute for Balkan Studies SASA
Nataša Simeunović Bajić
University of Niš
Stefan Vukojevic
University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Philosophy
Biljana Milanovic
Institute for Musicology of Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts
Vladimir Ajzenhamer
University of Belgrade
Jelena Perišić
Jagiellonian University
Uploads
Papers by Goran Guska
part of the Dayton Peace Agreement, which created the present state of Bosnia
and Herzegovina and it is specific in relation to the constitutions of most countries in the world. Thus, the Constitutional Court, which has the role of protector
of the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina, has its own specificities in relation
to the Constitutional Courts of States which the Constitution protects in that way.
One part of the paper is an analysis of the organization and jurisdiction of the
Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina with all its specificities as well
as the decision of the court with the focus on those decisions related to the assessment of the constitutionality of norms of legislative acts in Bosnia and Herzegovina that are not in accordance with the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina
or mandatory international legal acts with a focus on their non-execution. The
second part deals with criminal responsibility for non-execution of decisions of
the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina as well as legal mechanisms
in the function of securing the execution of decisions of the Constitutional Court.
The answers to the questions when there is criminal responsibility for non- execution of the decisions of the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, to
which it specifically refers and in relation to such practical actions, we obtained
by analyzing concrete decisions. Thus, we analyzed the decisions of the Constitutional Court regarding the Republic of Srpska Day and the referendum in Republic of Srpska in 2016.
Keywords: Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, non-execution
of a decision, criminal responsibility, Republic of Srpska Day, referendum
part of the Dayton Peace Agreement, which created the present state of Bosnia
and Herzegovina and it is specific in relation to the constitutions of most countries in the world. Thus, the Constitutional Court, which has the role of protector
of the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina, has its own specificities in relation
to the Constitutional Courts of States which the Constitution protects in that way.
One part of the paper is an analysis of the organization and jurisdiction of the
Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina with all its specificities as well
as the decision of the court with the focus on those decisions related to the assessment of the constitutionality of norms of legislative acts in Bosnia and Herzegovina that are not in accordance with the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina
or mandatory international legal acts with a focus on their non-execution. The
second part deals with criminal responsibility for non-execution of decisions of
the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina as well as legal mechanisms
in the function of securing the execution of decisions of the Constitutional Court.
The answers to the questions when there is criminal responsibility for non- execution of the decisions of the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, to
which it specifically refers and in relation to such practical actions, we obtained
by analyzing concrete decisions. Thus, we analyzed the decisions of the Constitutional Court regarding the Republic of Srpska Day and the referendum in Republic of Srpska in 2016.
Keywords: Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, non-execution
of a decision, criminal responsibility, Republic of Srpska Day, referendum