
Over the last few days, if you’re active on political media, you have probably seen references to the “controversy” over a student’s failing grade on an essay at Oklahoma University. “To be what I think is clearly discriminated against for my beliefs and using freedom of speech, and especially for my religious beliefs, I think that’s just absurd.” Samantha Fulnecky has demanded that the (transgender) instructor be punished, and the school duly suspended the TA, and launched an investigation. Those familiar with these sorts of controversies will not be surprised to learn that Turning Point USA is responsible for escalating an undergrad grading dispute into a national discourse, or that Ms. Fulnecky’s mother is a conservative podcaster who is now demanding that transgender people be banned from teaching.
This is a standard playbook, one that has been repeated dozens, if not hundreds of times. We are now all arguing about the details of a Teaching Assistant’s grading rubric, while the practical outcome on the ground will be to continue the project of giving conservative students and activists veto power over educational institutions and curricula. In fact, it serves as nearly a perfect example of how TPUSA actually works to advance conservative goals, and why so much of the media discourse around it this year has been so misguided and useless.
Continue reading







