
Niko Antalffy
My research is twofold: Critical Theory of science and technology, and consensual non-monogamy and polyamorous relationship cultures. I also venture into the Sociology of the environment as I teach this and have a contribution to make.
My two main projects are: 1) a book in the Philosophy of Sociology of science and technology, 2) establishing the basic directions in the Sociology of polyamory and consensual non-monogamy in general. I have a few more empirically based projects in 2).
At Macquarie University I teach Social Science, and Science and Sociology of the environment.
I prefer to work in research groups with great energy and passion so I'm always on the lookout for great collaborations.
Specialties
Sociology of Science and Technology, Social theory, Epistemology, alternative relationship cultures, sociology of the environment.
My two main projects are: 1) a book in the Philosophy of Sociology of science and technology, 2) establishing the basic directions in the Sociology of polyamory and consensual non-monogamy in general. I have a few more empirically based projects in 2).
At Macquarie University I teach Social Science, and Science and Sociology of the environment.
I prefer to work in research groups with great energy and passion so I'm always on the lookout for great collaborations.
Specialties
Sociology of Science and Technology, Social theory, Epistemology, alternative relationship cultures, sociology of the environment.
less
Related Authors
Maura Strassberg
Drake University
Jacki Yovanoff
University of Waterloo
Nathan Rambukkana
Wilfrid Laurier University
Francesca Miccoli
Universität Basel
Robert van Tol
Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh
Deborah Zalesne
City University of New York
Justin Mogilski
University of South Carolina
Lisa Welling
Oakland University
InterestsView All (22)
Uploads
Papers by Niko Antalffy
The specificity of our contribution to these debates is that we have dared to mix together academic research with autobiographical narration and reflection. We have done so with an awareness of the theoretical difficulties that such a gesture entails (See de Man 1983, Derrida 2000). Because such debates relate quite directly to how we read our intimate lives and fantasies, we have felt it not inappropriate in this context to speak of them, without being assured in advance of the legitimacy and interest of such a risk.
The specificity of our contribution to these debates is that we have dared to mix together academic research with autobiographical narration and reflection. We have done so with an awareness of the theoretical difficulties that such a gesture entails (See de Man 1983, Derrida 2000). Because such debates relate quite directly to how we read our intimate lives and fantasies, we have felt it not inappropriate in this context to speak of them, without being assured in advance of the legitimacy and interest of such a risk.