In the beginning, there was the Model of 1900, designed to accommodate a more powerful .38 cartridge, the .38 S&W Special. That soon morphed into the Model of 1905. It went through several modifications, including heat-treating the cylinder, to become the Model 1905, 4th Change, otherwise known as the M&P. That gun went through a number of changes over the years and, soon after the Korean Unpleasantness, was designated as the Model 10. More changes along way ensued, but the Model 10 remained and you can still buy one today.

However, the ammunition used in the 1920s, lead round-nosed bullets, couldn’t punch through a car’s door. They didn’t know about computers and such back then, only slide rules. They couldn’t run designs through simulators, so the only way to make a car stand up to the shitty roads that existed at the time was to make them heavy.

Hence, the .38-44 round was developed. This was a hotter load, but it would beat the hell out of a standard .38 revolver, and, not to mention, the recoil was not fun. So the .38/44 revolver, also known as the Heavy Duty, came along in 1930. This was, essentially, a .38 on the frame of a .44 Special revolver.

But more power was desired. To prevent morons from shooting a much more powerful cartridge, the .38 Special cartridge was lengthened a bit and, in 1935, the .357 Magnum was introduced. A more elegant version of the .38/44 revolver was introduced in “Registered Magnum” and non-registered versions. Both were finely finished and expensive. Gunsmiths began boring out the chambers of .38/44 revolvers. Smith & Wesson responded by bringing out the Highway Patrolman, which was not as finely finished, but functioned just as well and was a lot less expensive.

But those guns were also heavy and cops who spent their careers carrying guns that were never fired, other than to kill injured deer or on a qualification range, wanted something lighter.

To be continued.

That’s about what it feels like to try and add an item to the Blogroll. “Intuitive” does not describe it in any rational meaning of the word. Whoever designed this interface hates people.

I’ve tried cross-posting with the blog that’s been my main home for the last fifteen-odd years Frankly, it’s a bit of a pain of the ass.

It’s not that I trust Goggle all that much. I started this blog as a back-up platform a year after I started blogging. WordPress has its differences, some of which go away if I were to pay for it. But hell, this is a hobby.

And, because it’s a hobby, I really don’t feel like learning the ins and outs of another system without absolutely having to. Which I don’t have to.

Sen. Rafael T. Cruz said that waiting to shoot down the Chinese spy balloon until it was over water “telegraphed weakness”.

First off, I gather that the fact that the equipment package the balloon had was the size of three buses and there was no good way to tell where that would fall doesn’t bother Ted, but that’s to be expected from a double-Ivy league grad who is LARPing as a bubba.

If the balloon had gone over Austin Texas (where Ted lives), sure, shoot it down. But he probably would have grabbed a plane to Cancun for an impromptu vacation (and left his dog home, alone).

(Cross-posted here)

Boeing Chief Executive Officer David Calhoun confirmed to investors [in November] that the aircraft manufacturer is not looking to introduce a brand-new model anytime soon. He cited the lack of propulsion systems on the horizon that can deliver the improvements to make developing a new airframe worthwhile.

As aircraft often remain in the market for many years, Calhoun wants the next jet to be groundbreaking rather than rushed through to fill a gap. He explained that fuel efficiency and carbon emissions reductions are crucial hurdles that Boeing must overcome before moving forward.

So what Boeing will have in the 2030s is an entire aircraft manufacturing company which, from top to bottom, will have no experience at designing, building, and certifying a new airplane.

How well did that lack of design talent work for the Boeing CST-100? But I digress.

It took Boeing under three years to design and build the first 747. I sadly predict that there will be damn few people reading this blog ebtry today who will live to see a 797 take to the skies.

(Cross-posed here)

I have an extensive blogroll over at my original blog. If I make the move over here, I’m probably going to lose most of them. It’s taken me about fifteen years to accumulate all of those entries.

The other thing is that it’s taken me a goodly amount of time to build up a small community of regulars: People I look forward to hearing from. People who, although we’ve never met (and most of them, I have no idea what they look like), and who I’d hate to lose contact with.

But Goggle has started to fuck with me and, since I don’t get paid for any of this shit, I have little incentive to tolerate being fucked with.

I see that WordPress has both categories and tags. Not sure if I need both.

We shall soon see., I reckon

I’m still trying to figure out how this platform works. Google is giving me some trouble. I may try cross-posting for a bit and see how it goes.

It’s not because of any fuckery that Goggle is pulling.  I’ve been blogging there for thirteen years, now, and I’ve been OK with their platform.

But this one has a little more functionality.  One of them is the ability to set up an automatically-triggered banhamer.

I’ll need to figure out how to move the rather extensive blogrolls. Many of those people are cyber-friends and I’d hate to lose ties with them.

One of the drawbacks in living is such state is magazine limits.  If all you can use is a ten-round magazine, then a full-size 9mm is overly large for the capacity.  Other than ammunition costs (9mm practice ammo is really cheap now), you might as well carry a gun that shoots bigger bullets.

The original wondernine, the Browning High Power, is a good example. The standard 9mm held 13 rounds.  The .40 S&W variant, which had a fairly short production run, held ten rounds.

The S&W 3rd generation compact 9mms held 12 rounds.  The .40s held nine.

But let’s be frank:  The old debate over caliber size is utterly passé.  There has been enough work done that shows that the difference between an expanding 9mm and a .45 is maybe one or two tenths of an inch.  Handgun bullets incapacitate by penetrating deeply enough to hit vital stuff.  A down-right-now hit requires hitting the central nervous system, which is a small target and is at the back of the body.

As an aside, Lucky Gunner compared a lot of different rounds.

Velocity, out of handguns, matters for two reasons: Pushing the bullet out fast enough so it expands and so it penetrates enough.  Clear ballistic gel tests can show impressive temporary stretch cavities, but research has pretty well proven that unless a bullet hits at over 2,000 fps, a body isn’t affected by that.  Over 2,000 fps, there is tearing and other bad stuff, which is why a 5.56mm round at combat ranges does what it does.

But to the point: If you can’t carry all of the 9mm rounds that a gun can hold, you might as well carry one that holds bigger BBs.

I’ve moved to a less-than-free state.  That meant giving up my AR-15.  What the hell, I rarely shot it.

So I replaced it with a SKS.  If there’s an issue, 10 rounds should suffice.

And I still have a Garand.

And a 12-gauge.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started