Andrea Romano
Andrea Romano (1967) is a professor of Contemporary History and Russian History at the Università di Roma Tor Vergata. A former Member of Italian Parliament (2013-2022), he works mainly on Soviet History and History of European Socialism. He is currently the director of CESARC - Centro di Studi e Analisi sulla Russia contemporanea www.cesarc.uniroma2.it - Contact details: Andrea Romano - Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Dipartimento di Storia, Patrimonio culturale, Formazione e Società - Via Columbia 1, 00133 Roma - [email protected]
Address: Andrea Romano - Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Dipartimento di Storia, Patrimonio culturale, Formazione e Società - Via Columbia 1, 00133 Roma
Address: Andrea Romano - Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Dipartimento di Storia, Patrimonio culturale, Formazione e Società - Via Columbia 1, 00133 Roma
less
Related Authors
InterestsView All (6)
Uploads
Papers by Andrea Romano
different eras: in the second half of the 1930s, during the Great Patriotic
War, after World War II. This article surveys Western historiography on
the intertwining of Stalinism and Russian nationalism, focusing on the
discussion between those who have stressed the revival of traditional Great-
Russian rhetoric and those who have seen an effort to build a properly
Soviet and supranational identity. On this basis, the author emphasizes the
different profiles and functions of the three Stalinist versions of Russian
nationalism and highlights the need for more in-depth research on the last
one: the version related to the neo-imperial dimension of the Soviet Union
after WWII, which seems to elude both interpretations and to ask for more
detailed analysis
Books by Andrea Romano
different eras: in the second half of the 1930s, during the Great Patriotic
War, after World War II. This article surveys Western historiography on
the intertwining of Stalinism and Russian nationalism, focusing on the
discussion between those who have stressed the revival of traditional Great-
Russian rhetoric and those who have seen an effort to build a properly
Soviet and supranational identity. On this basis, the author emphasizes the
different profiles and functions of the three Stalinist versions of Russian
nationalism and highlights the need for more in-depth research on the last
one: the version related to the neo-imperial dimension of the Soviet Union
after WWII, which seems to elude both interpretations and to ask for more
detailed analysis