Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the "town hall" (meta-discussion site) for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

How to accept an answer?

+4
−0

Short question: how to accept an answer?

There is no "Accept" button, so I have chosen "Works for me".

Is this the intended way?

(And it looks like I accidentally edited my previous question, hopefully it stays unchanged.)

History

0 comment threads

2 answers

+5
−0

Yes, the "works for me" is roughly equivalent to the "accept" on that other site.

The difference is that anyone can do a "works for me," not just the Asker. Note that reactions are not anonymous. The available reactions vary by community so that only relevant ones are shown.[1]


  1. Hat tip to Monica in the comments. ↩︎

History

1 comment thread

Doesn't work here (3 comments)
+5
−0

Another answer has already addressed your main question. I'm adding this one for some background.

Early on, we decided that answer "acceptance" as found on some other sites didn't seem to be quite right. We saw two particular issues:

  • Why should one person be able to pin an answer to the top for everyone?
  • Why should only one person be able to do more than upvote?

In addition, we thought that "worked for me" is not the only kind of "meta-information" people might want to add to answers.

This is why we implemented reactions, which unlike votes are public (attributed). Reactions do not affect the score of a post (you should still upvote answers that are helpful and downvote ones that are deficient). People can and do upvote answers without testing them; the "works for me" reaction is meant as a way to say "I actually did this and it worked". On communities where this concept doesn't make sense, the reaction can be turned off.

History

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »