Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the "town hall" (meta-discussion site) for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Show revisions both in source, and rendered.

Post

Show revisions both in source, and rendered.

+3
−1

My Rationale

When I posted comments/thread/11196#comment-27732, I wanted to link to a rendered version of the revision, in order to demonstrate the new version of the post.

Certainly, I could just inform the user to view the current revision, but that might change between me posting my comment, and them viewing it. (Who doesn't deal with some notifications a few months late?)

More generically, when viewing a revision, not needing to paste it into an external Markdown renderer is convenient. I can't provide examples anymore, but I know that I've wanted it a few times.

If none of that convinces you:

  1. Stack Exchange provides this! 😊

  2. This would mitigate posts/294861.

(Lack Of) Duplicates

posts/search?search=render+history returned 0 relevant results at ⪅ +2025-10-30T00:05:27+00:00.

The Applicable Version

Version b7103551 (2025-10-17 15:42:56Z)

History

1 comment thread

related (5 comments)
related
Monica Cellio‭ wrote 4 months ago

You seem to be asking about comments. We have a similar request for posts, captured in a GitHub issue.

Monica Cellio‭, thanks. Updated history#4 to clarify. I doubt that two of these posts need to exist, unless the implementations of comments versus posts vastly differ. Therefore, should I flag this as a duplicate?

Monica Cellio‭ wrote 4 months ago

Comments and posts do have different underlying implementations, so let's leave this.

trichoplax‭ wrote 4 months ago

Although the title currently refers to "revisions of comments", the body of this question seems to be about links from comments to the post history (revisions of posts rather than revisions of comments). I haven't edited the title myself in case I have misunderstood your intention. Is "revisions of comments" intended to be "revisions of posts" in the title?

Even if that change is made to the title, I still would not consider this to be a duplicate. The post linked to is a request for a rendered preview for suggested edits that are yet to be approved, whereas this post appears to be requesting rendered versions of the edits in the post history. Although closely related, these are two separate changes and worth having two separate posts for. I've now linked to this one from that one.

trichoplax‭, indeed. I'll leave this as a superordinate of both types, instead. If someone is willing to file one specifically for comments, mark this as a duplicate of both the one for posts and comments.