
Danielle Child
Art historian and theorist (mid-20th/21st Century, historical materialist) interested in 'social practices' in art, with a particular focus on labour: collaboration; contracted labour within and outside of the studio; socially-engaged artistic practices; artists' groups/collectives; 'public' art; art-activism; social class and the economic sphere.
Lecturer in Creative and Cultural Industries, The University of Manchester, UK
Lecturer in Creative and Cultural Industries, The University of Manchester, UK
less
Related Authors
Muqtedar Khan
University of Delaware
Galen Strawson
The University of Texas at Austin
Julita Vassileva
University of Saskatchewan
Bob Jessop
Lancaster University
Alejandra B Osorio
Wellesley College
Rebecca Zorach
Northwestern University
David Seamon
Kansas State University
Babette Babich
Fordham University
Claire Bishop
Graduate Center of the City University of New York
Remo Caponi
University of Cologne
InterestsView All (29)
Uploads
Papers by Danielle Child
We are currently inviting abstracts for a special issue proposal to Third Text journal, edited by Danielle Child (Manchester School of Art) and Mor Cohen (Manchester School of Art).
We are currently inviting abstracts for a special issue proposal to Third Text journal, edited by Danielle Child (Manchester School of Art) and Mor Cohen (Manchester School of Art).
The social, in this sense, will be understood as a political concept. Although we have to approach ‘new’ modes of art making critically - for example, we might question who benefits from the ‘social’ of ‘socially-engaged art’ - this paper asks whether we could understand the new conception of public art as engaging with a political conception of public? Drawing on the writings of Hannah Arendt and Paolo Virno, the paper will discuss practices in relation to the political conception of virtuoso, whose historical site was that of the public square. With the return of the public square as a key site of recent political protest, revolution and contestations since 2011, this paper explores the situating of new social artistic practices in key urban sites, such as the public square, as a political practice.
Responding to the call for an alternative art history with an embedded social reproduction, this paper will explore the connection between social reproduction and art through returning to Marx’s categories of ‘productive’ and ‘unproductive labour’ from Theories of Surplus Value (1863). The discussion will take as its examples works that reference both socially reproductive and productive labour, before the ‘neoliberal turn’ (such as Hunt, Harrison and Kelly’s Women and Work: A Documentation on the Division of Labour, 1973-5) and within the contemporary period (Rimini Protokol, Call Cutta in a Box, 2008-10). Whilst work and life are becoming increasingly blurred under neoliberal working models, this paper stresses the importance of making the subject of labour (and its associations with class) visible within art history.
Through utilising theatrical devices, Deller engages with a political past and one that originated from the implementation of neoliberal policies within the UK. This paper will examine how the now-dominant neoliberal ideology, which takes the performer – what Paolo Virno has called the ‘virtuoso’ – as a model worker, assists practices that are counter to capitalism. Through bringing together the creative individualism once found in the somewhat mythical model of the artist and the connectivity of networks and ad hoc projects, neoliberalism has enabled an artistic practice critical of capitalism to grow and, more importantly, to organise. The dual nature of socially-engaged works of art – as theatrical and political - allows for a creative model of protest to be thought, exemplified in the diverse art-activist practices of Liberate Tate, the Reverend Billy and Billionaires For Bush; one that is both creative and affective.
The outsourcing of work is not new to British sculpture, however, the kind of services offered and the manufacturing possibilities associated with the appearance of non-art are particular to art-specific fabricators. Whilst situating the emergence of the Mike Smith Studio (arguably the first of its kind in England) within the context of 1990s Britain, I draw parallels and distinctions between the fabricators founded in America in the late 1960s and early 1970s, arguing that the Mike Smith Studio adopted and adapted the practices of these earlier business models. As a result of this I put forward the proposition that the YBAs are more akin to the artists associated with the American minimal art movement in their working practices (closely aligned with the art fabricators Gratz Industries and Lippincott Inc.) as opposed to their ʻfound objectʼ British forefathers.
See attached for details.