Showing posts with label web analytics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label web analytics. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 17, 2026

Facebook now only allows 63 characters for visible description

Facebook has made a terrible decision to limit the number of visible characters on posts of pics or links to a Facebook Page (124 characters with spaces in this sentence)

That includes spaces!

So the opening sentence of this blog post would be halved on Facebook. (this sentence is 69 characters with spaces - so you wouldn't see all of this short sentence)

Why is this happening?

Here's Google AI's explanation of what Facebook if trying to do.  

But you do agree with their reasoning? Read on to find out some of my thoughts on the imploications....

Is Facebook trying to behave exactly like an Advertiser?


In effect it is treating every post by all normal Facebook subscribers as if it was an advert.

It seems to want to get us to write ADVERT TITLES for each FB post!

Is it possible that is so they can sneak in more advert content and we won't notice.

Is it possible that it is trying to create more clicks to its site so it can show advertisers a click heavy profile?

Compare Facebook with Instagram


It's very similar to the truncated text associated with an Instagram pic. 
(73 characters including spaces)

Maybe Facebook is trying to be more like Instagram?

Thing is they are demographically quite different. The big difference being that users of Facebook tend to be older and don't skip or skim text the way those under 40 do.
Older users are readers - and they like to see text.

So maybe Facebook is trying to win back younger users?

However maybe Facebook is also alienating its older users (like me) at the same time?

Compare Facebook with Google

Title Links (Blue Links): Approximately 50–60 characters (or around 600 pixels).
Google AI tells me that the character limit allowed for the title associated with a weblink is 50-60 characters

Hence, one might conclude that Facebook wants us to write titles as the text for the first 63 characters of the description of what a pic is or where a website link leads

Conclusion: we need to get a lot smarter about writing text TITLES for our links or pics on Facebook Pages.

However Google has the advantage that it also shows text AFTER THE TITLE - with no "read more" prompt. i.e. we get to see more text when viewing a link in the Google Search Engine

These are called snippets and there has always been a limit on how many characters get displayed

So what does Google have to say about the ideal length of descriptions (snippets) after the title of a website link?

Something completely different from Facebook!

Guess who's more experienced in the search engine aspects of what gets people to open posts?

Bottom line - Google Search allows at least TWICE THE NUMBER OF CHARACTERS ALLOWED BY FACEBOOK.


Which is WHY the search description for this blog post reads
Facebook wants titles not text for posts on Pages. Check out the changes re text length and compare to what Google thinks is best.
Who do you think understands responsiveness to search engine links better?
Google or Facebook?

Tuesday, September 05, 2023

20 million pageviews!!

Making A Mark has finally achieved 20 million pageviews - as counted by Blogger!

It also recently made it to six million unique visits as well.

125k+ Visitors from all over the world in the last 6 months

I feel so silly though as I knew it was coming up - but took my eye off the ball so I don't know when it happened but it was in the last few days!

Despite me writing a lot less now (only 106 posts so far this year!) - for reasons I explained in my last post - it's still generating a lot of visits from all over the world - and most stick around and take a longer look at what else can be found on the blog.

Below are tips for how to get people to visit and to keep coming back....

Making A Mark - the story so far

Blogger hasn't quite adjusted to blogs being as old as mine. This is the chart on the stats page

The story since 2011 (when it was already 5 years old) - when it achieved 1 million visits

Previous posts on this topic include:

I included a tip for how to get visits and visitors who want to look around once they arrive in 11 tips for how to get 1 million website visitors quickly

The 11 Tips (explained in the post) were:
1. Make your website very focused
2. Make every webpage very specific - make it a niche within a niche
3. Make every title very specific in terms of its topic
4. Provide a short summary of what each page contains at the top.
5. Make navigation very easy
6. Have a plan for how your website will develop
7. Use statistics to guide development
8. People look at images and read words - but really they scan both!
9. Write about what you know
10. Refresh and update a website regularly (use a blog)
11. Do link to relevant other websites - and encourage them to link back

Blog posts to date

The Archive tells me that the pattern looks like this - with over 4,400 published blog posts to date.

I started out writing virtually every day - for three years.

Then started having one day a week off. I producing around about 300 posts each year or very nearly 6 blog posts a week. This continued (apart from when I was on holiday) until I started to write my book in 2014.

Wednesday, January 15, 2020

Making A Mark achieves 5 MILLION visits!

Making A Mark recently received its 5 millionth visit!

When you've spent most of the last year noting the the number of visitors to your blog is edging ever close to 5 million visitors, you feel pretty stupid when it zips past the 5 million mark and you didn't even notice!!

Making A Mark is also coming up to 15 MILLION PAGEVIEWS and I'm now determined not to miss that one!

5 Million unique visits between January 2006 and January 2020

So this is the chart of how Making A Mark achieved 5 million visits from both first-time and returning visitors.

It took five years to get the millionth visitor in April 2011 - see Making A Mark notches up 1 million visits.  

At that time these were the most popular blog posts
Here are ten of the most popular posts those million visits have been to:
  1. 10 Tips for How to Sketch People
  2. Van Gogh: Drawing media and techniques
  3. Composition - Principles of Design
  4. Composition - The Elements of Design
  5. Colour Schemes: Split Complementaries, Triads and Tetrads
  6. What is a still life?
  7. The influence of Japanese Art
  8. Which sketchbook?
  9. Flowers in Art... and Charles Rennie Mackintosh
  10. Major Art Competitions in the UK 2011 - a timetable
Back in April last year I wrote a blog post about how I managed to get to 1 million visitors a lot faster with my new website Botanical Art and Artists.

See 11 tips for how to get 1 million website visitors quickly for the explanation of how. It's my belief that traffic has arrived much faster because the site is a lot more focused and 'niche' compared to Making A Mark.

The 11 Tips (explained in the post) were:
1. Make your website very focused
2. Make every webpage very specific - make it a niche within a niche
3. Make every title very specific in terms of its topic
4. Provide a short summary of what each page contains at the top.
5. Make navigation very easy
6. Have a plan for how your website will develop
7. Use statistics to guide development
8. People look at images and read words - but really they scan both!
9. Write about what you know
10. Refresh and update a website regularly (use a blog)
11. Do link to relevant other websites - and encourage them to link back

The Making A Mark Story

Below are the number of blog Posts I wrote while triggering 5 million visits. Apparently I've written nearly 4,400 blog posts!  That's a lot of words - but I'm not going to start counting those!
► 2019 (174)
► 2018 (206)
► 2017 (191)
► 2016 (180)
► 2015 (218)
► 2014 (221)
► 2013 (275)
► 2012 (304)
► 2011 (288)
► 2010 (307)
► 2009 (310)
► 2008 (358)
► 2007 (393)
► 2006 (348)
I started out writing virtually every day - for three years.

Then started having one day a week off. I producing around about 300 posts each year or very nearly 6 blog posts a week. This continued (apart from when I was on holiday) until I started to write my book in 2014. 

Output dropped off while I wrote the book

It continued at the lower level of around 200 blog posts a year. Now I aim for between 3-4 blog posts a week on Making A Mark - but it's sometimes less and sometimes more.

So about half the output - but retaining about two thirds of the traffic. 

The lovely thing about having a very old blog - people come back for your archives as much as your new content. (You can access any of the old posts via the side column - using archives or keywords)

The reason for the reduced output on Making A Mark is because, after finishing my book, I developed two new "spinoff" websites in 2015 - which covered topics previously featured on Making A Mark 
So the blog posts related to those topics tended to go to the new sites and the traffic went with them - and then grew again on the new sites!  

In total, the visits I now get each year are as follows
  • Making A Mark - nudges towards 400k visitors a year.  
  • Botanical Art and Artists - over 500k visits a year
  • Art Business Info for Artists - approx. 200 k visits a year
Which means I'm now generating more than 1 million visits each year on all my sites!  Which I like to think requires rather more effort and is a little more meaningful than showing people pics on Instagram!

However I had no idea I was busting through the 1,000,000 visits a year benchmark until I sat down to write this post!  I'm feeling quite overcome!

I've still not got used to being recognised as I walk around London and visit art galleries - with the frequent exclamation of "You're Making A Mark!!!" - but it's always lovely to meet readers so please continue to say Hello if you spot me!

Wednesday, October 26, 2016

10 million page views!

Making A Mark achieved 10 million page views at 2.15pm this afternoon! I've been looking forward to this for a while.....

I was slightly slow in catching up with the event so this is what it looked like when I took a screendump at 2.20pm.

The page view count (courtesy of Blogger in the side column of Making A Mark
followed by the Visitor Count generated by Statcounter

Blogger has only been counting page views since 2008
whereas this blog is coming up to 11 years old having been started at the end of 2005 and went public in January 2006

That means that there's actually around 2 years worth of page views somewhere!

What's the difference between page views counted by Blogger and Google Analytics?


I found out the difference between page views as counted by Blogger and page views as counted by Google Analytics yesterday.

  • Apparently Google literally counts page views - and as we know a view of a blog on one page may have several blog posts. 
  • Whereas Blogger counts the views for every blog post - as if every post was its own page - which of course it is since it has a unique URL.  
That's why I'm minded to say that the Blogger count to my mind is more accurate as it's counting visits to blog posts - by URL. Only those who come to the domain name page get treated as one visit even if they read every post on that home page!!!

Blogger also counts your own page views unless you turn them off as I do.

Statcounter seems to come between the two - but has a different length of time for how long the cookie stays before a visit from the same person counts as a repeat visit.

The geographical dimension


Of course things have also got complicated due to the fact that Blogger now uses geographical endings for all Blogger blogs on the basis that this allows them to cater for different requirements of the laws in every country. I've never quite got that one worked out - however I am totally convinced that Google Analytics does not count all page views properly when a blog is read globally.

The importance of your archive


The other interesting thing about page views is that if you have a lot of blog posts as I do (this is the 3,183rd!) about niche topics then you continue to generate traffic for that post long after you wrote it - via search traffic. (If you get your titles and meta description right!)

That's one of the reasons why the traffic to my blog is remaining pretty steady despite the fact I'm not writing as many posts.

The stats from the stats page for Making A Mark on Blogger!

In fact, you could day that the 10,000,000 page views are down to one of the things I learned very early on - which was the importance of making your archive accessible 

I commented to Alyson Stanfield earlier this year that...

I thank the day I read the article by Jakob Neilsen in which he pointed out that your assets (and your traffic) are in your Archives and you just need to find new ways of unlocking them for others!
[I think it was this particular Alertbox - in which he highlighted the statistical verification of making Archives accessible]

Of course - I guess you also have to have content that people think is worth reading! ;)

Sunday, November 22, 2015

Search Quality Guidelines: Find out how Google rates websites

Ever wondered how Google rates websites to determine how they rank in their search engine?

The aim of this post is to:
  • tell you the latest news from Google - it will impact on whether and how often people find your website or blog
  • relate what Google says about how to rate websites to things that artists do on or with their websites. Every so often you will see a TIP.

What's New?


Google did something extremely unusual this month.

For the very first time, Google published the entire document of Guidelines given to people who evaluate websites for the purposes of influencing the factors used in the Google Search Engine algorithm (the thing which determines which websites rank well or badly).

This is because:
  • they've just done an update and 
  • they want more and more people to understand how sites are rated for search queries via mobile devices.
What it also means is that Google are helping us to understand better about what matters, how you can help you website - and how you can mess up!

The reason I take what Google says seriously is demonstrated by the chart below. Nearly 95% of the search queries whioch generate traffic for this blog come via Google.


I haven't read every aspect of the Guidelines as yet - and consequently may come back and update this post.

How search quality evaluation works


Google hires people to evaluate websites according to a very structured and very detailed regime. This assessment regime is detailed in the Guidelines Manual which has now been released in full and fully up to date.

The results of the assessments help Google to determine the weighting of the various factors which are incorporated into the algorithm which actually determines the rankings of websites within the Google Search Engine - in relation to specific queries.

Thus for example it might determine how important how recent new content or relevance to a local context might be.

Documentation


Updating Our Search Quality Rating Guidelines was the blog post on the Official Google Webmaster Central Blog "Official news on crawling and indexing sites for the Google index"

Some people missed it but buried in the text was a link to a 160 page PDF document titled 'General Guidelines' and dated 12th November 2015.

You can download this SEO Gold Mine for free !

People have described this document as being leaked but I'm not sure how a link in an official blog gets evaluated as being a leak.  I think maybe they just like to call it a "leak" as it makes for a good story!

If you read the blog post, Google makes it quite clear
In 2013, we published our human rating guidelines to provide transparency on how Google works and to help webmasters understand what Google looks for in web pages. Since that time, a lot has changed: notably, more people have smartphones than ever before and more searches are done on mobile devices today than on computers.

We often make changes to the guidelines as our understanding of what users wants evolves, but we haven’t shared an update publicly since then. However, we recently completed a major revision of our rater guidelines to adapt to this mobile world, recognizing that people use search differently when they carry internet-connected devices with them all the time.
Thus the key change is the impact of mobile devices - and this is recognised in terms of:
  • the inclusion of  Part 2 - Understanding Mobile Needs 
  • plus lots of examples in the Guidelines uses the mobile view to demonstrate what they mean

So what do the Guidelines say


Quality


The Guidelines define in some considerable detail what they mean by different levels of quality. 

Below are reasons for assessing a page as being of Low Quality. (MC means "main content"; SC means "supplementary content")

If a page has one of the following characteristics, the Low rating is usually appropriate:
  • The quality of the MC is low. 
  • There is an unsatisfying amount of MC for the purpose of the page. 
  • The author of the page or website does not have enough expertise for the topic of the page and/or the website is not trustworthy or authoritative for the topic. In other words, the page/website is lacking E-A-T. 
  • The website has a negative reputation. 
  • The SC is distracting or unhelpful for the purpose of the page.

Below is the definition of what makes a High Quality Page.

Extract from page 20
It needs at least one characteristic out of:
  • a satisfying amount of high quality "main content" (ie MC = what your website is about)
  • The page and author are expert. authoritative and trustworthy for the topic of the page
  • the website has a good repuattion for the topic of the page.

PLUS Google also wants to see:
  • who you are and how you can be contacted
  • Supplementary Content (SC) which makes for a satisfying a user experience on the page and website
  • a website which is designed in such a way that the user knows what is main content and which is supplementary - and it allows people to navigate between the two
  • "a website which is well cared for and maintained" (i.e. updated from time to time and not ignored e.g. old and out of date content is removed)

In terms of the best content....
We will consider the MC of the page to be very high or highest quality when it is created with a high degree of time and effort, and in particular, expertise, talent, and skill. Very high quality MC may be created by experts, hobbyists, or even people with everyday expertise. Our standards depend on the purpose of the page and the type of content. The Highest rating may be justified for pages with a satisfying or comprehensive amount of very high quality MC.
TIP: In terms of artists, first-person experience is considered to be one way of defining expertise. Hence artists who write extremely detailed and helpful reviews of products or places are likely to give their websites or blogs a boost!
When it comes to rating a website or blog this is what the Guidelines say (Page )
The top three most important PQ considerations are:
  • Quality and quantity of Main Content. Examine the MC carefully. Given the purpose of the page, evaluate the quality and quantity of MC. 
  • Level of expertise, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness (E-A-T) of the page and the website. The level of E-A-T is extremely important for YMYL pages. 
  • Reputation of the website. The reputation of a website is very important when the website demands a high level of trust.

New Topics in this Version


The guidelines have a NEW emphasis on 'mobile'.  Thus we have Part 2: Understanding Mobile User Needs

There is also something called "Needs met". This aims to distinguish between pages which deliver a very fast and appropriate response on recent events - which must be fresh - and older authoritative websites which might only update occasionally (ie authoritative information doesn't tend to change every five minutes)

New approaches


The quality raters will be testing via mobile devices as well as from a desktop.
TIP: The emphasis on mobile means the opening sentences of pages and blog posts are now extremely important. They should signal the content of the page. You'll notice how I very often in the first paragraph say:
  • what the blog post is about
  • what the blog post contains
I do the same thing on the websites I'm building. The aim is to waste people's time as little as possible. My sites may not be the ones they're looking for - but I do want people to leave with a favoruable impression.
and another thing
TIP: It's absolutely essential that your website or blog can be read easily via a mobile device. If you've not yet implemented a responsive template which adjusts what content looks like for the size of the screen - now is the time to do so!

Important concepts


EAT is an important concept. (This was a new introduction last year - and it's still important.)

It stands for 'expertise, authority and trustworthiness' i.e. all the reasons why you would choose to read one website rather than another.
TIP: From an artist's perspective it's about what might they be writing about or hoping to promote which demands that they are experts and trustworthy.
EXAMPLE: One example might be people offering art tuition. 

People evaluating websites for classes or workshops where money changes hands might well be looking for indicators of:
  • indicators of expertise (eg training; qualifications etc)
  • length of time they have been doing this (eg no. of years of experience as a tutor)
  • number of people who reference (link to them) them as the "go to" art tutor
  • indicators of trustworthiness re money (e.g. detailed contact details; use of appropriate mechanisms which are safe for customers; security certificate for the site)

and finally


I was very pleased to see this on page 66!
Art pages do have a purpose: artistic expression. Pages created for artistic expression do not deserve the Low quality rating simply because they have no other purpose. Artistic expression, humor, entertainment, etc. are all valid page purposes.
I'm interested to know what you make of the Guidelines. (Do bear in mind they are a Technical Manual for people employed to do a job). Do please leave a comment.

Tuesday, August 25, 2015

Can you believe it? 8 million pageviews!

While I was out sketching in Cambridge on Sunday, somebody took a look at a page on Making A Mark and notched up the 8,000,000th page view - according to Blogger!

Magdalen Bridge and Scudamores, Cambridge
pen and sepia ink and coloured pencils
I got a non-stop commentary from the Punter Guides of the history of Magdalene College as they went past below!
Isn't it absolutely amazing that one woman's interest in art and willingness to share can turn into an art blog which gets visited by people from all over the world (see below)?

I have to say I still can't quite get over the fact that when I go to sketchcrawls and exhibitions I meet lots of people who all know who I am even though I've never ever met any of them before.

I'd love to say "Thanks!" to the person who viewed that 8 millionth page - but all I know is that you live in one of the places listed below!

Instead I'll say "Thank you" to you all - and I do hope you come back again and look at some more! My archives are extensive! :)

Current Country Totals From 1 Aug 2015 to 25 Aug 2015

 United States (US)12,478
 United Kingdom (GB)6,683
 Canada (CA)1,160
 Australia (AU)1,101
 India (IN)449
 Germany (DE)330
 France (FR)306
 Netherlands (NL)235
 Philippines (PH)224
 New Zealand (NZ)207
 Ireland (IE)194
 Spain (ES)179
 Italy (IT)150
 South Africa (ZA)148
 Singapore (SG)144
 Brazil (BR)120
 Europe (EU)110
 Japan (JP)98
 Korea, Republic of (KR)97
 Belgium (BE)95
 Malaysia (MY)91
 Russian Federation (RU)89
 Pakistan (PK)80
 Sweden (SE)75
 Poland (PL)70
 Mexico (MX)61
 Turkey (TR)60
 Romania (RO)57
 Portugal (PT)56
 Hong Kong (HK)54
 Israel (IL)54
 Indonesia (ID)53
 Norway (NO)51
 Greece (GR)48
 Finland (FI)47
 United Arab Emirates (AE)46
 Thailand (TH)45
 Czech Republic (CZ)42
 Switzerland (CH)41
 Denmark (DK)39
 Argentina (AR)39
 Ukraine (UA)35
 Taiwan (TW)30
 Austria (AT)29
 Asia/Pacific Region (AP)29
 Bulgaria (BG)28
 Hungary (HU)26
 Croatia (HR)25
 Bangladesh (BD)24
 Egypt (EG)24
 Saudi Arabia (SA)20
 Slovenia (SI)19
 Jordan (JO)18
 Serbia (RS)18
 Colombia (CO)18
 Slovakia (SK)17
 Cyprus (CY)17
 Trinidad and Tobago (TT)16
 Vietnam (VN)15
 Nigeria (NG)15
 Chile (CL)15
 Nepal (NP)12
 Sri Lanka (LK)10
 Peru (PE)10
 Iceland (IS)10
 Jamaica (JM)10
 Cayman Islands (KY)9
 Algeria (DZ)9
 Morocco (MA)9
 Uruguay (UY)9
 Lithuania (LT)9
 Estonia (EE)9
 Puerto Rico (PR)9
 Mauritius (MU)8
 Luxembourg (LU)7
 Albania (AL)7
 Malta (MT)6
 Lebanon (LB)6
 Latvia (LV)6
 Brunei Darussalam (BN)6
 Isle of Man (IM)6
 Guernsey (GG)6
 Ghana (GH)5
 China (CN)5
 Venezuela (VE)4
 Ecuador (EC)4
 Costa Rica (CR)4
 Dominican Republic (DO)4
 Botswana (BW)4
 Kazakstan (KZ)4
 Cambodia (KH)3
 Kenya (KE)3
 Armenia (AM)3
 Maldives (MV)3
 Georgia (GE)3
 Macedonia (MK)3
 Tanzania, United Republic of (TZ)3
 Montenegro (ME)3
 Zimbabwe (ZW)3
 Namibia (NA)3
 Jersey (JE)2
 Belarus (BY)2
 Bosnia and Herzegovina (BA)2
 Oman (OM)2
 Ethiopia (ET)2
 Bolivia (BO)2
 Qatar (QA)2
 Guatemala (GT)2
 Virgin Islands, U.S. (VI)2
 Uganda (UG)2
 Palestinian Territory (PS)2
 Iraq (IQ)2
 Paraguay (PY)2
 Panama (PA)2
 French Guiana (GF)1
 Nicaragua (NI)1
 Netherlands Antilles (AN)1
 Guyana (GY)1
 Papua New Guinea (PG)1
 Madagascar (MG)1
 New Caledonia (NC)1
 Faroe Islands (FO)1
 Vanuatu (VU)1
 Zambia (ZM)1
 Seychelles (SC)1
 Aruba (AW)1
 Rwanda (RW)1
 Mongolia (MN)1
 Bhutan (BT)1
 Macau (MO)1
 Cuba (CU)1
 Kuwait (KW)1
 Bermuda (BM)1
 Gibraltar (GI)1
 Syrian Arab Republic (SY)1
 Libyan Arab Jamahiriya (LY)1
 Lao People's Democratic Republic (LA)1
 Antigua and Barbuda (AG)1
 Azerbaijan (AZ)1
 El Salvador (SV)1
 Guam (GU)1
 Honduras (HN)1
 Cape Verde (CV)1
 Myanmar (MM)1
 Belize (BZ)1
 Barbados (BB)1
Source: Clustrmap