Carlos Alberto Ramalho
Carlos Ramalho
Advocate for human rights. Legal scholar. Disability rights leader. Theologian.
Born in São Paulo, Brazil, Carlos Ramalho’s life journey spans continents, professions, and callings, each shaped by a relentless pursuit of justice, faith, and empowerment. From a young age, he was drawn to the power of ideas, the struggle for human rights, and the ethical complexities of governance and law. His career has since unfolded at the intersection of philosophy, theology, and legal advocacy, shaping his approach to education, leadership, and transformative justice.
Carlos began his career as a law professor and attorney, specializing in anti-corruption law, jurisprudence, and international human rights. Passionate about intellectual inquiry and justice, he taught philosophy, human rights, and international law, engaging students in critical discourse about ethics, governance, and legal systems. His legal practice was marked by a commitment to integrity and fearless advocacy, confronting systemic corruption and defending the rights of marginalized communities.
However, the pursuit of justice often comes at a cost. Amid violence and political persecution, Carlos was forced into exile—first in Europe, where he deepened his engagement with legal theory, theology, and human rights, and later in the United States, where he found both refuge and renewal.
A New Chapter: Leadership in Disability Advocacy
Since 2019, Carlos has served as Executive Director of Living Independently for Today and Tomorrow (LIFTT) (www.liftt.org), a center for independent living committed to empowering individuals with disabilities across Montana. His leadership at LIFTT has been transformative, expanding the organization’s reach, advocacy, and services. By championing innovation, inclusion, and accessibility, he has strengthened disability rights activism, community outreach, and systemic change.
At LIFTT, Carlos continues to apply his expertise in law, ethics, and social justice, bridging legal frameworks, policy analysis, and community-based activism to advocate for independent living and disability rights.
Academic and Theological Inquiry: A Lifelong Commitment
Carlos’ academic journey reflects a profound commitment to lifelong learning, interdisciplinary scholarship, and faith-based service. His background in Public and Private International Law, enriched by ongoing theological studies at Luther Seminary, allows him to engage with complex legal, philosophical, and religious questions in a multidisciplinary way.
His research spans philosophy, theology, epistemology, and human rights, exploring topics such as:
1. Plato’s epistemology and post-truth discourse
2. The role of critical thinking in democracy
3. Intersections of theology, law, and social justice
4. Theological perspectives on human dignity and inclusion
5. Legal and ethical dimensions of disability rights
6. Philosophy, Faith, and the Pursuit of Knowledge
Beyond his professional and academic life, Carlos remains an avid reader, critical thinker, and seeker of wisdom. Inspired by Montana’s serene natural landscapes, he continues to reflect on the deeper questions of justice, ethics, and human existence. His journey is one of perseverance, faith, and transformation, guided by the belief that knowledge, justice, and compassion must work together in the pursuit of a more equitable world.
Research Interests
1. Epistemology and the Philosophy of Knowledge
2. Plato’s Political and Ethical Thought
3. Postmodern Theology and Critical Theory
4. Comparative Religious Studies
5. Legal Theory and Human Rights Law
6. Corruption and Justice Systems
7. Independent Living and Disability Rights Advocacy
8. Interfaith Dialogue and Religious Ethics
9. Theology and Social Justice
Phone: 14062945190
Address: 1201 Grand Avenue, Suite 1
Advocate for human rights. Legal scholar. Disability rights leader. Theologian.
Born in São Paulo, Brazil, Carlos Ramalho’s life journey spans continents, professions, and callings, each shaped by a relentless pursuit of justice, faith, and empowerment. From a young age, he was drawn to the power of ideas, the struggle for human rights, and the ethical complexities of governance and law. His career has since unfolded at the intersection of philosophy, theology, and legal advocacy, shaping his approach to education, leadership, and transformative justice.
Carlos began his career as a law professor and attorney, specializing in anti-corruption law, jurisprudence, and international human rights. Passionate about intellectual inquiry and justice, he taught philosophy, human rights, and international law, engaging students in critical discourse about ethics, governance, and legal systems. His legal practice was marked by a commitment to integrity and fearless advocacy, confronting systemic corruption and defending the rights of marginalized communities.
However, the pursuit of justice often comes at a cost. Amid violence and political persecution, Carlos was forced into exile—first in Europe, where he deepened his engagement with legal theory, theology, and human rights, and later in the United States, where he found both refuge and renewal.
A New Chapter: Leadership in Disability Advocacy
Since 2019, Carlos has served as Executive Director of Living Independently for Today and Tomorrow (LIFTT) (www.liftt.org), a center for independent living committed to empowering individuals with disabilities across Montana. His leadership at LIFTT has been transformative, expanding the organization’s reach, advocacy, and services. By championing innovation, inclusion, and accessibility, he has strengthened disability rights activism, community outreach, and systemic change.
At LIFTT, Carlos continues to apply his expertise in law, ethics, and social justice, bridging legal frameworks, policy analysis, and community-based activism to advocate for independent living and disability rights.
Academic and Theological Inquiry: A Lifelong Commitment
Carlos’ academic journey reflects a profound commitment to lifelong learning, interdisciplinary scholarship, and faith-based service. His background in Public and Private International Law, enriched by ongoing theological studies at Luther Seminary, allows him to engage with complex legal, philosophical, and religious questions in a multidisciplinary way.
His research spans philosophy, theology, epistemology, and human rights, exploring topics such as:
1. Plato’s epistemology and post-truth discourse
2. The role of critical thinking in democracy
3. Intersections of theology, law, and social justice
4. Theological perspectives on human dignity and inclusion
5. Legal and ethical dimensions of disability rights
6. Philosophy, Faith, and the Pursuit of Knowledge
Beyond his professional and academic life, Carlos remains an avid reader, critical thinker, and seeker of wisdom. Inspired by Montana’s serene natural landscapes, he continues to reflect on the deeper questions of justice, ethics, and human existence. His journey is one of perseverance, faith, and transformation, guided by the belief that knowledge, justice, and compassion must work together in the pursuit of a more equitable world.
Research Interests
1. Epistemology and the Philosophy of Knowledge
2. Plato’s Political and Ethical Thought
3. Postmodern Theology and Critical Theory
4. Comparative Religious Studies
5. Legal Theory and Human Rights Law
6. Corruption and Justice Systems
7. Independent Living and Disability Rights Advocacy
8. Interfaith Dialogue and Religious Ethics
9. Theology and Social Justice
Phone: 14062945190
Address: 1201 Grand Avenue, Suite 1
less
Related Authors
InterestsView All (9)
Uploads
Papers by Carlos Alberto Ramalho
The paper begins by tracing the evolution of concentration camps, from early political repression under totalitarian regimes to their use as industrialized mechanisms of genocide. It examines how different nations have confronted — or evaded — their histories, contrasting Germany’s active reckoning with Nazism with Russia’s suppression of Stalinist atrocities and China’s continued operation of internment camps. The study also investigates the weaponization of memory, addressing Holocaust denial, historical revisionism, and the politicization of genocide narratives.
Beyond political history, the paper engages with philosophical and theological reflections on the moral weight of memory. Hannah Arendt’s concept of the “banality of evil,” Theodor Adorno’s skepticism about post-Holocaust representation, and Richard Rubenstein’s radical theology challenge conventional understandings of historical reckoning. These perspectives raise unsettling questions: Can sites of horror become spaces of healing? Does memorialization prevent future atrocities, or does it risk becoming an empty ritual?
In the digital age, memory faces new challenges. The paper explores how AI-generated survivor testimonies, virtual reality reconstructions of Holocaust sites, and social media trends are reshaping how history is learned — and manipulated. While these tools offer unprecedented access to historical Knowledge, they also risk trivializing trauma, reinforcing misinformation, and allowing memory to be commodified.
Ultimately, this study argues that the act of remembering is not passive; it is an ethical and political responsibility. The future of memory depends on whether societies choose to confront historical truths or distort them for ideological convenience. In an era where authoritarianism is rising, and genocide remains a present reality, concentration camps stand not only as remnants of past horrors but as urgent warnings for the future.
By examining Plato’s Allegory of the Cave, the Divided Line, the problem of defining knowledge, Meno’s Paradox, and the Socratic Method, this study demonstrates that:
1. Social media and algorithmic manipulation function as modern caves, trapping individuals in curated illusions and ideological echo chambers.
2. The contemporary crisis of truth mirrors Protagoras’ relativism in Theaetetus, where all beliefs are considered equally valid, undermining objective knowledge.
3. Meno’s Paradox explains the modern struggle of learning in an age of instant information, while Plato’s theory of recollection (anamnesis) provides a model for deep intellectual engagement.
4. The Socratic Method remains an indispensable tool for combating misinformation, cultivating intellectual humility, and preserving democratic discourse.
The paper argues that Plato’s philosophical insights are not just historically significant but essential for navigating today’s epistemic crises. By reviving Socratic questioning, dialectical reasoning, and a commitment to justified true belief, society can resist the manipulative forces of the digital age and reclaim the pursuit of knowledge as an ethical and intellectual necessity.
This study concludes that Plato’s legacy is not confined to antiquity but serves as an urgent call to action — to move beyond opinion (doxa) toward true understanding (epistēmē), to embrace intellectual humility, and to cultivate a more critically engaged and truth-seeking society.
Keywords: Plato, Socrates, epistemology, post-truth, misinformation, Allegory of the Cave, Divided Line, Socratic Method, knowledge, relativism, digital epistemology, fake news, echo chambers, cognitive bias, justified true belief, critical thinking, democracy, AI and knowledge.
The paper begins by examining God’s self-disclosure to Moses in Exodus 3:14 (Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh, "I AM WHO I AM"), analyzing whether this declaration aligns with classical theism’s immutable essence or a more existential, unfolding presence. It then explores the creation accounts in Genesis 1-2, where divine being is revealed not as an abstract ontological necessity but as a speech-act of world-making (dabar theology). Through the prophets’ encounters with God, particularly in Isaiah and Jeremiah, the study highlights how divine being is not a mere concept but an existential call that confronts human history.
The New Testament reconfigures divine ontology through Christology, particularly in John 1:1-14 (the Logos as divine being) and Philippians 2:6-11 (kenosis and self-emptying love), revealing a God whose being is fully realized in incarnation, crucifixion, and resurrection. The paper engages with Martin Heidegger’s critique of onto-theology, Karl Barth’s theology of divine self-revelation, Wolfhart Pannenberg’s eschatological ontology, and Paul Tillich’s concept of God as the ground of being. Ultimately, it argues that the fullness of divine being is not static but eschatological, culminating in the resurrection as the definitive revelation of God’s reality.
This study challenges both classical metaphysical essentialism and existentialist reductionism, advocating for a biblical ontology of divine being as historical, relational, and redemptive. God’s being is neither a timeless abstraction nor an existential projection but a self-revealing presence that is known through covenant, incarnation, and eschatological fulfillment. The conclusion posits that the biblical answer to the ontological question is not simply "Being-itself" but "Being-in-relationship", a God who was, who is, and who will be (Revelation 22:13).
Key Themes:
1. Biblical Ontology vs. Classical Metaphysics
2. God’s Being as Relational, Dynamic, and Historical
3. Theological Engagement with Heidegger, Barth, Pannenberg, and Tillich
4. Incarnation and Resurrection as the Fullness of Divine Being
The discussion defines disaster preparedness, emphasizing the necessity of inclusivity, advanced technologies, and collaboration among government agencies, private organizations, NGOs, and community-based entities. It highlights the transformative role of artificial intelligence (AI) in predicting risks, optimizing responses, and enhancing accessibility for disabled and aging individuals. The paper also underscores the pivotal contributions of Centers for Independent Living (CILs), such as Living Independently for Today and Tomorrow (LIFTT), in fostering grassroots resilience and advocating for equitable emergency planning.
By addressing systemic gaps and proposing actionable strategies, this paper argues that inclusive disaster preparedness is not only a technical and logistical requirement but also a moral imperative to protect society’s most vulnerable members. The conclusion calls for stronger partnerships, greater technological integration, and a commitment to equity in building disaster-resilient communities.
The paper begins by tracing the evolution of concentration camps, from early political repression under totalitarian regimes to their use as industrialized mechanisms of genocide. It examines how different nations have confronted — or evaded — their histories, contrasting Germany’s active reckoning with Nazism with Russia’s suppression of Stalinist atrocities and China’s continued operation of internment camps. The study also investigates the weaponization of memory, addressing Holocaust denial, historical revisionism, and the politicization of genocide narratives.
Beyond political history, the paper engages with philosophical and theological reflections on the moral weight of memory. Hannah Arendt’s concept of the “banality of evil,” Theodor Adorno’s skepticism about post-Holocaust representation, and Richard Rubenstein’s radical theology challenge conventional understandings of historical reckoning. These perspectives raise unsettling questions: Can sites of horror become spaces of healing? Does memorialization prevent future atrocities, or does it risk becoming an empty ritual?
In the digital age, memory faces new challenges. The paper explores how AI-generated survivor testimonies, virtual reality reconstructions of Holocaust sites, and social media trends are reshaping how history is learned — and manipulated. While these tools offer unprecedented access to historical Knowledge, they also risk trivializing trauma, reinforcing misinformation, and allowing memory to be commodified.
Ultimately, this study argues that the act of remembering is not passive; it is an ethical and political responsibility. The future of memory depends on whether societies choose to confront historical truths or distort them for ideological convenience. In an era where authoritarianism is rising, and genocide remains a present reality, concentration camps stand not only as remnants of past horrors but as urgent warnings for the future.
By examining Plato’s Allegory of the Cave, the Divided Line, the problem of defining knowledge, Meno’s Paradox, and the Socratic Method, this study demonstrates that:
1. Social media and algorithmic manipulation function as modern caves, trapping individuals in curated illusions and ideological echo chambers.
2. The contemporary crisis of truth mirrors Protagoras’ relativism in Theaetetus, where all beliefs are considered equally valid, undermining objective knowledge.
3. Meno’s Paradox explains the modern struggle of learning in an age of instant information, while Plato’s theory of recollection (anamnesis) provides a model for deep intellectual engagement.
4. The Socratic Method remains an indispensable tool for combating misinformation, cultivating intellectual humility, and preserving democratic discourse.
The paper argues that Plato’s philosophical insights are not just historically significant but essential for navigating today’s epistemic crises. By reviving Socratic questioning, dialectical reasoning, and a commitment to justified true belief, society can resist the manipulative forces of the digital age and reclaim the pursuit of knowledge as an ethical and intellectual necessity.
This study concludes that Plato’s legacy is not confined to antiquity but serves as an urgent call to action — to move beyond opinion (doxa) toward true understanding (epistēmē), to embrace intellectual humility, and to cultivate a more critically engaged and truth-seeking society.
Keywords: Plato, Socrates, epistemology, post-truth, misinformation, Allegory of the Cave, Divided Line, Socratic Method, knowledge, relativism, digital epistemology, fake news, echo chambers, cognitive bias, justified true belief, critical thinking, democracy, AI and knowledge.
The paper begins by examining God’s self-disclosure to Moses in Exodus 3:14 (Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh, "I AM WHO I AM"), analyzing whether this declaration aligns with classical theism’s immutable essence or a more existential, unfolding presence. It then explores the creation accounts in Genesis 1-2, where divine being is revealed not as an abstract ontological necessity but as a speech-act of world-making (dabar theology). Through the prophets’ encounters with God, particularly in Isaiah and Jeremiah, the study highlights how divine being is not a mere concept but an existential call that confronts human history.
The New Testament reconfigures divine ontology through Christology, particularly in John 1:1-14 (the Logos as divine being) and Philippians 2:6-11 (kenosis and self-emptying love), revealing a God whose being is fully realized in incarnation, crucifixion, and resurrection. The paper engages with Martin Heidegger’s critique of onto-theology, Karl Barth’s theology of divine self-revelation, Wolfhart Pannenberg’s eschatological ontology, and Paul Tillich’s concept of God as the ground of being. Ultimately, it argues that the fullness of divine being is not static but eschatological, culminating in the resurrection as the definitive revelation of God’s reality.
This study challenges both classical metaphysical essentialism and existentialist reductionism, advocating for a biblical ontology of divine being as historical, relational, and redemptive. God’s being is neither a timeless abstraction nor an existential projection but a self-revealing presence that is known through covenant, incarnation, and eschatological fulfillment. The conclusion posits that the biblical answer to the ontological question is not simply "Being-itself" but "Being-in-relationship", a God who was, who is, and who will be (Revelation 22:13).
Key Themes:
1. Biblical Ontology vs. Classical Metaphysics
2. God’s Being as Relational, Dynamic, and Historical
3. Theological Engagement with Heidegger, Barth, Pannenberg, and Tillich
4. Incarnation and Resurrection as the Fullness of Divine Being
The discussion defines disaster preparedness, emphasizing the necessity of inclusivity, advanced technologies, and collaboration among government agencies, private organizations, NGOs, and community-based entities. It highlights the transformative role of artificial intelligence (AI) in predicting risks, optimizing responses, and enhancing accessibility for disabled and aging individuals. The paper also underscores the pivotal contributions of Centers for Independent Living (CILs), such as Living Independently for Today and Tomorrow (LIFTT), in fostering grassroots resilience and advocating for equitable emergency planning.
By addressing systemic gaps and proposing actionable strategies, this paper argues that inclusive disaster preparedness is not only a technical and logistical requirement but also a moral imperative to protect society’s most vulnerable members. The conclusion calls for stronger partnerships, greater technological integration, and a commitment to equity in building disaster-resilient communities.