
Barbara Barrow
Senior Lecturer/Associate Professor, Lund University
less
Related Authors
Ben De Bruyn
UCLouvain (University of Louvain)
Jiri Flajsar
Palacky University, Olomouc
John Gough
Deakin University Waurn Ponds
Martin Malone
University of Aberdeen
Valeria Taddei
University College Dublin
Myriam Muriel Mercader Varela
Universitat de Barcelona
kasia boddy
University of Cambridge
InterestsView All (28)
Uploads
Papers by Barbara Barrow
The dandelion puffs her balls,
Free spinsters of the air,
Who scorn to wait for beetle calls
Or bees to find them fair;
But breaking through the painted walls
Their sisters tamely bear,
Fly off in dancing down, which falls
And sprouts up everywhere.
(ll. 17–24)1
Through these anthropomorphized "spinsters," Blind merges two different accounts of reproduction from Charles Darwin's works. The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication (1868) discusses spontaneous plant budding, while The Descent of Man (1871) describes how male animals vie for females' attention through display, dance, and song.2 Yet here, on this "lusty green" (l. 2), it is the spinster dandelion who "puffs her balls" in display, not to solicit a mate's attention, but for her own pleasure. The seeds "Fly off in dancing down" in language that hints at Darwin's male suitors, but heterosexual reproduction is not the aim of this performance. The poem uncovers the queer possibilities of nature, possibilities that celebrate nonreproductive desire while defying, even "scorn[ing]," the male / female binary found in the Descent.
Blind joins her late Victorian contemporaries Constance Naden and Laurence Hope in crafting a Darwinian poetics that draws on evolution and [End Page 97] sexual selection to uncover nature's queer possibilities. While the traffic of Darwin's ideas with misogynistic and homophobic rhetoric is well known, less attention has been paid to how his theories could also unsettle conventional accounts of gender, sexuality, and reproductive teleology.3 In this essay, I mean "queer" in Holly Furneaux's sense of "that which differs from the life-script of opposite-sex marriage and reproduction."4 All three poets lived lives that challenged this life script. Blind and Naden were both New Women who never married.5 Laurence Hope, less well known among literature and science scholars, was the pen name of Adela Florence Nicolson, wife of a colonel in the Bengal Army. She scandalized her contemporaries with her erotic verse and disregard of feminine modesty, and would dress herself—problematically—as a Pashtun boy in order to follow her husband out on his military campaigns.6
For these three poets, male pseudonyms were a means of crossing gender lines and facilitating publication. Blind wrote under "Claude Lake" for her first volume of poetry and Naden sometimes used "C. Arden" or "C.A." for her scientific writing.7 Nicolson kept the pseudonym Laurence Hope even after its status as a pseudonym was likely known.8 And all three poets worked with intertexts that explored ideas about gender and sexuality, especially a tradition of evolutionary verse that included works by Alfred Tennyson and Algernon Charles Swinburne. Hope's poetry also takes inspiration from bhakti verse, a tradition of Hindu devotional poetry that, as Rohit K. Dasgupta and Rima Bhattacharya have shown, challenges heterosexual norms.9 Together, their late-century scientific poems offer a testimony to the imaginative possibilities of Darwin's ideas, ideas that they used to decenter heterosexual marriage and to imagine a more gender-inclusive present.
Aurora Leigh’s political poetics, then, turns on the conflict between two kinds of bodies: the larger social body the poet seeks to represent and the distorting presence of her own embodied, feminine sensibility. In what follows, I argue that Aurora Leigh responds to this conflict by claiming disembodiment as a poetic and political strategy. While acknowledging the poem’s insistently physical idiom, I seek to uncover an alternative subtext of images of abstracted, vanishing, and intangible bodies, and to show how this subtext is equally central to Aurora Leigh. Through the associated figures of Aurora and Marian, Barrett Browning’s epic presents us with many examples of the body’s denial and disappearance. These negations offer a revitalized political poetics even as they disassociate women’s language from women’s physical experiences.
poetry into his _Principles of Geology_ (1830-33) in order to show how deep time made the past of epic poetry seem foreshortened and obsolete, Tennyson's "In Memoriam" (1850) and Mathilde Blind's "The Ascent of Man" (1889) respond by claiming the epic as a domain that could resist scientific inquiry. In so doing, they show how epic form and epic temporality can be used to explore controversial questions of cosmological origins in ways that empirical science writing could not.
The dandelion puffs her balls,
Free spinsters of the air,
Who scorn to wait for beetle calls
Or bees to find them fair;
But breaking through the painted walls
Their sisters tamely bear,
Fly off in dancing down, which falls
And sprouts up everywhere.
(ll. 17–24)1
Through these anthropomorphized "spinsters," Blind merges two different accounts of reproduction from Charles Darwin's works. The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication (1868) discusses spontaneous plant budding, while The Descent of Man (1871) describes how male animals vie for females' attention through display, dance, and song.2 Yet here, on this "lusty green" (l. 2), it is the spinster dandelion who "puffs her balls" in display, not to solicit a mate's attention, but for her own pleasure. The seeds "Fly off in dancing down" in language that hints at Darwin's male suitors, but heterosexual reproduction is not the aim of this performance. The poem uncovers the queer possibilities of nature, possibilities that celebrate nonreproductive desire while defying, even "scorn[ing]," the male / female binary found in the Descent.
Blind joins her late Victorian contemporaries Constance Naden and Laurence Hope in crafting a Darwinian poetics that draws on evolution and [End Page 97] sexual selection to uncover nature's queer possibilities. While the traffic of Darwin's ideas with misogynistic and homophobic rhetoric is well known, less attention has been paid to how his theories could also unsettle conventional accounts of gender, sexuality, and reproductive teleology.3 In this essay, I mean "queer" in Holly Furneaux's sense of "that which differs from the life-script of opposite-sex marriage and reproduction."4 All three poets lived lives that challenged this life script. Blind and Naden were both New Women who never married.5 Laurence Hope, less well known among literature and science scholars, was the pen name of Adela Florence Nicolson, wife of a colonel in the Bengal Army. She scandalized her contemporaries with her erotic verse and disregard of feminine modesty, and would dress herself—problematically—as a Pashtun boy in order to follow her husband out on his military campaigns.6
For these three poets, male pseudonyms were a means of crossing gender lines and facilitating publication. Blind wrote under "Claude Lake" for her first volume of poetry and Naden sometimes used "C. Arden" or "C.A." for her scientific writing.7 Nicolson kept the pseudonym Laurence Hope even after its status as a pseudonym was likely known.8 And all three poets worked with intertexts that explored ideas about gender and sexuality, especially a tradition of evolutionary verse that included works by Alfred Tennyson and Algernon Charles Swinburne. Hope's poetry also takes inspiration from bhakti verse, a tradition of Hindu devotional poetry that, as Rohit K. Dasgupta and Rima Bhattacharya have shown, challenges heterosexual norms.9 Together, their late-century scientific poems offer a testimony to the imaginative possibilities of Darwin's ideas, ideas that they used to decenter heterosexual marriage and to imagine a more gender-inclusive present.
Aurora Leigh’s political poetics, then, turns on the conflict between two kinds of bodies: the larger social body the poet seeks to represent and the distorting presence of her own embodied, feminine sensibility. In what follows, I argue that Aurora Leigh responds to this conflict by claiming disembodiment as a poetic and political strategy. While acknowledging the poem’s insistently physical idiom, I seek to uncover an alternative subtext of images of abstracted, vanishing, and intangible bodies, and to show how this subtext is equally central to Aurora Leigh. Through the associated figures of Aurora and Marian, Barrett Browning’s epic presents us with many examples of the body’s denial and disappearance. These negations offer a revitalized political poetics even as they disassociate women’s language from women’s physical experiences.
poetry into his _Principles of Geology_ (1830-33) in order to show how deep time made the past of epic poetry seem foreshortened and obsolete, Tennyson's "In Memoriam" (1850) and Mathilde Blind's "The Ascent of Man" (1889) respond by claiming the epic as a domain that could resist scientific inquiry. In so doing, they show how epic form and epic temporality can be used to explore controversial questions of cosmological origins in ways that empirical science writing could not.