
Sonja Zeman
Address: Institut für deutsche Philologie
der LMU München
Schellingstraße 3 / RG
D-80799 München
Germany
***
Professur für Germanistische Sprachwissenschaft
Otto-Friedrich Universität Bamberg
96047 Bamberg
https://www.uni-bamberg.de/germ-ling1/personen/prof-dr-sonja-zeman/
der LMU München
Schellingstraße 3 / RG
D-80799 München
Germany
***
Professur für Germanistische Sprachwissenschaft
Otto-Friedrich Universität Bamberg
96047 Bamberg
https://www.uni-bamberg.de/germ-ling1/personen/prof-dr-sonja-zeman/
less
Related Authors
Natalia Igl
Høgskolen i Østfold
Ruben Zimmermann
Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Achim Saupe
Zentrum für Zeithistorische Forschung Potsdam e.V.
Katharina König
University of Münster
Florence Oloff
Institut für Deutsche Sprache, Mannheim
Irina Rajewsky
Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Sophia Wege
Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg
Annika Hamachers
German Police University
Silvia Ettl-Huber
University of Applied Sciences Burgenland
InterestsView All (32)
Uploads
Papers by Sonja Zeman
This is the central question of the paper which functions as an introduction to the edited volume "Perspectivization on narrativity and narrative perspectivization" (2016, John Benjamins). Based on an overview of narratological and linguistic approaches to narrativity, it argues for a dynamic account that sees narrativity as a specific constellation of perspectivization that dynamically emerges from the interaction between the textual structure and the recipient’s interpretation.
This question is pursued from a historical perspective by means of the Middle High German tense system. It is shown that the distinction of an ‘anaphoric’ vs. ‘deictic’ reference system is a crucial factor for the binary constitution of the Middle High German tense system. Taking into account the underlying frame of reference not only allows an appropriate semantic description but is also capable of explaining register variation which cannot be handled within a pure temporal approach. Against this background, possible correspondences between grammatical and sociocultural developments as the medial shift from orality to literacy are discussed
‚Mündlichkeit' erfassten Phänomenbereiche aufzuzeigen. Vor diesem Hintergrund werden grundlegende Implikationen für eine pragmatische Erfassung der Interdependenz von Grammatik und
‚Mündlichkeit‘ und die damit verbundenen Konsequenzen hinsichtlich der theoretischen Erfassung eines 'Pragmatischen Standards‘ diskutiert.
This is the central question of the paper which functions as an introduction to the edited volume "Perspectivization on narrativity and narrative perspectivization" (2016, John Benjamins). Based on an overview of narratological and linguistic approaches to narrativity, it argues for a dynamic account that sees narrativity as a specific constellation of perspectivization that dynamically emerges from the interaction between the textual structure and the recipient’s interpretation.
This question is pursued from a historical perspective by means of the Middle High German tense system. It is shown that the distinction of an ‘anaphoric’ vs. ‘deictic’ reference system is a crucial factor for the binary constitution of the Middle High German tense system. Taking into account the underlying frame of reference not only allows an appropriate semantic description but is also capable of explaining register variation which cannot be handled within a pure temporal approach. Against this background, possible correspondences between grammatical and sociocultural developments as the medial shift from orality to literacy are discussed
‚Mündlichkeit' erfassten Phänomenbereiche aufzuzeigen. Vor diesem Hintergrund werden grundlegende Implikationen für eine pragmatische Erfassung der Interdependenz von Grammatik und
‚Mündlichkeit‘ und die damit verbundenen Konsequenzen hinsichtlich der theoretischen Erfassung eines 'Pragmatischen Standards‘ diskutiert.
URL: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461445617691706a.
The book offers a novel approach to the question of how to model narrativity against the background of perspectivization. By bringing together contributions from neuro- and cognitive linguistics, literary studies, and picture theory, the volume uncovers basic mechanisms of perspectivization that are common to the different levels of linguistic structure, literary novels, and narrative pictures. As such, it is also a book on narrative perspectivization since its contributions examine in detail the perspectival principles in medieval, romantic and postmodern literature, in the micro-linguistic structure of language, narrative pictures, literary novels, dramatic texts, and everyday stories. In doing so, it contributes both to the theoretical debate on the core definition of narrativity and offers new empirical investigations on perspectival principles in specific historical, medial, and genre constellations. This volume will be of interest to scholars and students of cognitive linguistics, narrative research and (transmedial) narratology, cognitive poetics, and stylistics.