{"id":2,"date":"2017-03-24T13:20:32","date_gmt":"2017-03-24T11:20:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/litdemo.hypotheses.org\/?page_id=2"},"modified":"2023-01-03T17:26:36","modified_gmt":"2023-01-03T15:26:36","slug":"accueil","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/litdemo.hypotheses.org\/","title":{"rendered":"Accueil \/ Homepage"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

PARUTION
\n<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Literature, democracy and Transitional Justice. <\/strong>Comparative World Perspectives<\/strong><\/p>\n

Mohamed-Salah Omri and Philippe Roussin (Eds.)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Legenda- Modern Humanities Research Association-Transcript 19.<\/strong><\/p>\n

10 d\u00e9cembre – 2022
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n

When a society emerges from authoritarian rule, and the State no longer claims a monopoly on the truth, writing becomes essential \u2013 in representing rights, calling for justice, staking claims and counter-claims over what has happened, testifying to abuse, directing \"\"<\/strong>collective memory, or simply resisting amnesia. Such writing is a key element of Transitional Justice, whose juridical and historical origins lie in the Nuremberg trials of 1945-46, and which has since become increasingly important in former colonies and emerging democracies. Truth and reconciliation commissions are now able to hear narrative evidence of a kind which no court would previously have considered.<\/p>\n

This multi-disciplinary collection of essays focuses on the comparative study of literatures and testimonies written in the wake of violence and on their role in the aftermath of conflict. Scholars from the fields of literary studies, history, art, politics and philosophy engage with each other, and with case studies ranging across the world: from Algeria, Argentina, Columbia, Portugal, Rwanda, Spain, South Africa, Syria, Tunisia, Taiwan and the former Yugoslavia.<\/p>\n

En savoir plus<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

COLLOQUE\u00a0 – VENDREDI 4 JUIN 2021 – EXP\u00c9RIENCES DU CHOC : LITT\u00c9RATURE ET CRISES DE LA D\u00c9MOCRATIE<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"Ce colloque en ligne organis\u00e9 par\u00a0Aix-Marseille Universit\u00e9<\/a>, le\u00a0Centre de recherches sur les arts et le langage<\/a> (CRAL-CNRS\/EHESS) \/ GDRI\u00a0<\/a>Litt\u00e9rature et d\u00e9mocratie<\/a>\u00a0et l\u2019Universidad Aut\u00f3noma de Madrid<\/a> aura lieu le 4 juin 2021. Avec le soutien de l’UMR TELEMMe (AMU-CNRS), de la Maison m\u00e9diterran\u00e9enne des sciences de l\u2019homme. Consulter le programme.<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"PUBLICATION<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

\"\"Post-ce<\/em>nsure(s) – <\/em>Philippe Roussin, Catherine Brun (dirs.)<\/span><\/strong><\/h1>\n<\/div>\n

Revue Communications N\u00b0106, Le Seuil, 2020.<\/p>\n

Dans la d\u00e9finition lib\u00e9rale de la d\u00e9mocratie qui pr\u00e9vaut aujourd\u2019hui, libert\u00e9 d\u2019expression et d\u00e9mocratie semblent se confondre : id\u00e9es et \u00e9crits doivent pouvoir circuler sans entraves. Tel est, depuis les Lumi\u00e8res, le r\u00e9cit du lib\u00e9ralisme, qui a souvent plac\u00e9 la lutte contre la censure au c\u0153ur de l\u2019histoire du modernisme artistique et litt\u00e9raire. C\u2019est ce r\u00e9cit que les d\u00e9mocraties lib\u00e9rales ont oppos\u00e9 \u00e0 la situation de la cr\u00e9ation et de l\u2019art des r\u00e9gimes totalitaires, dans les p\u00e9riodes de guerre froide comme aujourd\u2019hui.<\/p>\n

Depuis plusieurs d\u00e9cennies, la foi dans les vertus et les b\u00e9n\u00e9fices de la libert\u00e9 d\u2019expression a, pourtant, \u00e9t\u00e9 largement remise en cause tandis que la notion de censure s\u2019est elle-m\u00eame consid\u00e9rablement \u00e9largie : elle ne d\u00e9signe plus seulement les interdictions prononc\u00e9es par l\u2019\u00c9glise ou l\u2019\u00c9tat mais un processus social continu de filtrage des opinions conduisant \u00e0 un conformisme id\u00e9ologique et artistique. L\u2019attention des censeurs s\u2019est aussi d\u00e9plac\u00e9e de l\u2019imprim\u00e9 aux m\u00e9dia visuels et \u00e0 l\u2019internet. Par ailleurs, les \u00c9tats ne sont plus d\u00e9sormais les seuls ni m\u00eame les premiers acteurs de la censure. Enfin<\/em>, dans les soci\u00e9t\u00e9s lib\u00e9rales, o\u00f9 l\u2019\u00c9tat affiche sa neutralit\u00e9 en mati\u00e8re de m\u0153urs, la \u00ab soci\u00e9t\u00e9 civile \u00bb a surgi <\/em>comme source critique et normative potentielle, modifiant le visage de la censure en la privatisant. Les exemples de pressions abondent, ces derni\u00e8res ann\u00e9es, ainsi que les poursuites intent\u00e9es par diverses associations ou communaut\u00e9s.<\/em><\/p>\n

C\u2019est sans doute que nous sommes \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e8re de la \u00ab post-censure \u00bb, celle des op\u00e9rations civiles, m\u00e9diatiques, num\u00e9riques, multinationales de recouvrement ou de neutralisation de gestes cr\u00e9atifs, d\u2019\u00e9nonc\u00e9s (fussent-ils haineux), d\u2019informations ou d\u2019images jug\u00e9s perturbateurs et de ce fait \u00ab offensants \u00bb.<\/p>\n

En savoir plus<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

PUBLICATION<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"Escribir la democracia.<\/strong> <\/em>Literatura y transiciones democr\u00e1ticas – <\/em><\/strong>Anne-Laure Bonvalot, Anne-Laure Rebreyend et Philippe Roussin (dirs.)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Collection de la Casa de Vel\u00e1zquez, 2019<\/p>\n

Cet ouvrage questionne la place et le r\u00f4le de la litt\u00e9rature dans les processus de transition de la troisi\u00e8me vague d\u00e9mocratique des ann\u00e9es 1974-2005, depuis les transitions latino-am\u00e9ricaines des ann\u00e9es 1980 jusqu\u2019aux exp\u00e9riences les plus r\u00e9centes des r\u00e9volutions d\u00e9mocratiques des printemps arabes. Les \u00e9tudes de sp\u00e9cialistes venus de disciplines et d\u2019horizons culturels divers (France, Espagne, Portugal, \u00c9tats-Unis, Royaume-Uni) permettent de saisir \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9chelle globale les mutations contemporaines des enjeux de la d\u00e9mocratisation dans le champ litt\u00e9raire, et explorent la construction politique d\u2019un monde commun dans l\u2019exp\u00e9rience de la litt\u00e9rature.<\/p>\n

Table des mati\u00e8res<\/a><\/p>\n

Lire l’ouvrage<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

PUBLICATION<\/strong>\"\"<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

\"\"D\u00e9mocratie et litt\u00e9rature. Exp\u00e9riences quotidiennes, espaces publics, r\u00e9gimes politiques<\/em> – <\/em>Philippe Roussin, Sebastian Veg <\/b>(dirs.)<\/span><\/strong><\/h1>\n<\/div>\n

Revue Communications N\u00b099, Le Seuil, 2016.<\/p>\n

Depuis quelques ann\u00e9es, les r\u00e9flexions en cours sur la d\u00e9mocratie permettent de poser autrement la question du rapport entre litt\u00e9rature et politique, dans un contexte qui n\u2019est plus celui de la dichotomie engagement – autonomie. Il s\u2019agit plut\u00f4t d\u2019analyser le r\u00f4le de la litt\u00e9rature dans la construction sociale de l\u2019exp\u00e9rience quotidienne, de l\u2019institutionnalisation d\u2019un ou de multiples espaces publics et du partage de normes disput\u00e9es dans le cadre de r\u00e9gimes politiques eux-m\u00eames divers.
\nCe num\u00e9ro de Communications explore la question \u00e0 partir des relations entre litt\u00e9rature, d\u00e9mocratie et espaces publics aujourd\u2019hui. Il regroupe un ensemble de contributions qui s\u2019attachent \u00e0 autant de cas diff\u00e9rents \u2013 France, Afrique du Sud (J. M. Coetzee), Alg\u00e9rie, Chine (Yan Lianke, Mo Yan), Egypte (les slogans de la r\u00e9volution \u00e9gyptienne), Espagne, Irlande (Joyce), Italie (groupe Wu Ming) – permettant ainsi de comparer et de traiter des litt\u00e9ratures de pays o\u00f9 la d\u00e9mocratie est soit une r\u00e9alit\u00e9 ancienne ou r\u00e9cente soit une id\u00e9e incertaine.<\/p>\n

Table des mati\u00e8res<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

PR\u00c9SENTATION DU CARNET<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Ce carnet a pour vocation de diffuser les activit\u00e9s et les productions du groupe de recherche international \u00ab Literature and Democracy (19th-21st centuries) \u00bb. Il est compos\u00e9 de 65 chercheurs et de 15 PhD de diff\u00e9rentes disciplines (philosophes, litt\u00e9raires, comparatistes, historiens et sociologues) et pays (Espagne, \u00c9tats-Unis, France, Grande-Bretagne, Japon, Taiwan, Tunisie).<\/p>\n

L\u2019objectif du carnet est de d\u00e9velopper et stabiliser un r\u00e9seau scientifique international (GDRI) portant sur la litt\u00e9rature et la d\u00e9mocratie du XIXe au XXIe s. par une approche \u00e0 la fois th\u00e9orique, historique, comparative et interdisciplinaire. Ce carnet est donc destin\u00e9 \u00e0 faciliter la coop\u00e9ration entre les membres du groupe de recherche, \u00e0 la diffusion des \u00e9v\u00e9nements du GDRI ainsi qu\u2019\u00e0 la valorisation des travaux et des publications des membresc<\/p>\n

\n

A<\/em><\/span><\/strong>\"\"<\/em><\/span><\/strong>BOUT THIS SCIENTIFIC BLOG<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

The principal aim of this scientific blog is to facilitate the spread of the scientific activities and productions of the International Scientific Coordination Network ‘Literature & Democracy (XIXth-XXIst centuries)’. The network is composed of 65 researchers and 15 PhD from several disciplines (philosophers, literary specialists, comparatists, historians and sociologists) and states (France, Japan, Spain, Taiwan, Tunisia, United Kingdom, United States).<\/em><\/p>\n

The objective of this blog is to develop and to stabilize an international scientific network (GDRI) concerning the literature and the democracy of the XIXth in XXIst by an at the same time theoretical, historic, comparative and interdisciplinary approach. This scientific blog is therefore intended to facilitate the cooperation between the members of the group, the distribution of the events of the GDRI, the valuation of the works and the publications of the members.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

PARUTION Literature, democracy and Transitional Justice. Comparative World Perspectives Mohamed-Salah Omri and Philippe Roussin (Eds.) Legenda- Modern Humanities Research Association-Transcript 19. 10 d\u00e9cembre – 2022 When a society emerges from authoritarian rule, and the State no longer claims a monopoly … Continuer la lecture →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18130,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_license":"","publish_to_discourse":"","publish_post_category":"","wpdc_auto_publish_overridden":"","wpdc_topic_tags":"","wpdc_pin_topic":"","wpdc_pin_until":"","discourse_post_id":"","discourse_permalink":"","wpdc_publishing_response":"","wpdc_publishing_error":"","footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-2","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/litdemo.hypotheses.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/litdemo.hypotheses.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/litdemo.hypotheses.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/litdemo.hypotheses.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18130"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/litdemo.hypotheses.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/litdemo.hypotheses.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":956,"href":"https:\/\/litdemo.hypotheses.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2\/revisions\/956"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/litdemo.hypotheses.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}