
Andreas Rau
Feel free to contact me via andreas.rau(at)leiza.de
Phone: 0049-4621-813 544
Address: LEIBNIZ-ZENTRUM
FÜR ARCHÄOLOGIE
Zentrum für Baltische und Skandinavische Archäologie
Schloss Gottorf
Schlossinsel 1
24837 Schleswig
T: +49 4621 813 544
Phone: 0049-4621-813 544
Address: LEIBNIZ-ZENTRUM
FÜR ARCHÄOLOGIE
Zentrum für Baltische und Skandinavische Archäologie
Schloss Gottorf
Schlossinsel 1
24837 Schleswig
T: +49 4621 813 544
less
Related Authors
Aidan O'Sullivan
University College Dublin
Mišo Mudrić
University of Zagreb
David Stuart
The University of Texas at Austin
Alex Woolf
University of St Andrews
Marco Valenti
University of Siena / Università di Siena
Larry Swain
Bemidji State University
Rory Naismith
University of Cambridge
John Ljungkvist
Uppsala University
Alejandra B Osorio
Wellesley College
Jeroen W.P. Wijnendaele
Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
InterestsView All (36)
Uploads
Papers by Andreas Rau
Europe has been much discussed in recent times. Direct interference and presence of Hunnic military forces in Scandinavia have even been considered, which are said to have caused manifold cultural reorientation. However, a critical review of the archaeological material shows that direct impact of the Hun “period” on social and ritual behaviour was present in only a few respects in Scandinavia. Rather, the same cultural orientation to the South and Southeast is detected at the end of the 4th century and in the first half of the 5th century AD, which was already apparent with multiple connections in phases C2 and C3, especially to the Northern Pontus region. Furthermore, this orientation can also be defined by Scandinavian finds in the post-Hunnic Danubian region, during the second half of the 5th century and the beginning of the 6th century.
Europe has been much discussed in recent times. Direct interference and presence of Hunnic military forces in Scandinavia have even been considered, which are said to have caused manifold cultural reorientation. However, a critical review of the archaeological material shows that direct impact of the Hun “period” on social and ritual behaviour was present in only a few respects in Scandinavia. Rather, the same cultural orientation to the South and Southeast is detected at the end of the 4th century and in the first half of the 5th century AD, which was already apparent with multiple connections in phases C2 and C3, especially to the Northern Pontus region. Furthermore, this orientation can also be defined by Scandinavian finds in the post-Hunnic Danubian region, during the second half of the 5th century and the beginning of the 6th century.