
Gianluca Ghio
Related Authors
Ahmed Mahros
Fayoum University
Graeme A Ward
Queens University Kingston ON
Sofie Waebens
KU Leuven
Katelijn Vandorpe
KU Leuven
Walter Scheidel
Stanford University
Anna Dolganov
Austrian Academy of Sciences
Michael Alexander Speidel
University of Zurich, Switzerland
Michał Duch
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
Mark Kindrachuk
University of Saskatchewan
InterestsView All (26)
Uploads
Papers by Gianluca Ghio
Given these differences, it is important to deliberate on what role the Roman army had in the integration process of the Egyptian province. In fact, Roman soldiers represented the first embodiment of Roman culture outside the Italian peninsula, the first element the local population came in contact with in the aftermath of the conquest. Given this, it is interesting to investigate whether the legionaries were aware of their cultural ‘task’, or if they were only acting as the military representation of the occupying power.
The cultural effects of this research are evident: the examination of the Roman perception by the local population has, in fact, ambivalent implications. Firstly, it requires a deep analysis of Roman ideology, namely how Roman elite justified their domination over so many different civilizations. Such a concept is nowadays defined as Roman Imperialism. This aspect can be extrapolated from ancient authors’ testimonies, though we need to keep in mind that the concept of Imperialism has modern, post-capitalist origins, and cannot be semantically detected in the Greco-Latin world. Once the Roman mind-set has been analysed, it is necessary to switch to the local population. The second part of our investigation will therefore be conducted by collecting a series of selected evidence ranging from epigraphic data to papyri. The common denominator of such sources is the perspective on everyday life that connected soldiers and civilians. The final aim is to present, with reasonable precision, how the scenario of reciprocal interactions formed the image of the Roman soldier deployed in the provinces.
Given these differences, it is important to deliberate on what role the Roman army had in the integration process of the Egyptian province. In fact, Roman soldiers represented the first embodiment of Roman culture outside the Italian peninsula, the first element the local population came in contact with in the aftermath of the conquest. Given this, it is interesting to investigate whether the legionaries were aware of their cultural ‘task’, or if they were only acting as the military representation of the occupying power.
The cultural effects of this research are evident: the examination of the Roman perception by the local population has, in fact, ambivalent implications. Firstly, it requires a deep analysis of Roman ideology, namely how Roman elite justified their domination over so many different civilizations. Such a concept is nowadays defined as Roman Imperialism. This aspect can be extrapolated from ancient authors’ testimonies, though we need to keep in mind that the concept of Imperialism has modern, post-capitalist origins, and cannot be semantically detected in the Greco-Latin world. Once the Roman mind-set has been analysed, it is necessary to switch to the local population. The second part of our investigation will therefore be conducted by collecting a series of selected evidence ranging from epigraphic data to papyri. The common denominator of such sources is the perspective on everyday life that connected soldiers and civilians. The final aim is to present, with reasonable precision, how the scenario of reciprocal interactions formed the image of the Roman soldier deployed in the provinces.