Tag Archives: education

What I Think Artificial Intelligence Will Do – & What It Won’t Do – In K-12 Education (Larry Ferlazzo)

I teach English, social studies, and International Baccalaureate classes to English language learners and mainstream students at Luther Burbank High School in Sacramento, California.

I’ve written eight books: Navigating the Common Core With English Language Learners (with co-author Katie Hull Sypnieski); Building a Community of Self-Motivated Learners: Strategies to Help Students Thrive in School and Beyond; Classroom Management Q&As: Expert Strategies for Teaching; Self-Driven Learning: Teaching Strategies for Student Motivation; The ESL/ELL Teacher’s Survival Guide (with co-author Katie Hull Sypnieski); Helping Students Motivate Themselves: Practical Answers to Classroom Challenges; English Language Learners: Teaching Strategies That Work; and Building Parent Engagement in Schools (with co-author Lorie Hammond).

I’ve won several awards, including the Leadership for a Changing World Award from the Ford Foundation, and was the Grand Prize Winner of the International Reading Association Award for Technology and Reading.

I write a popular education blog, a weekly teacher advice column for Education Week Teacher, and a weekly post for The New York Times. My articles on education policy regularly appear in The Washington Post and HuffPost.com. In addition, my articles have appeared in publications such as ASCD Educational Leadership, Social Policy, and Language Magazine.”

Ferlazzo’s article appeared on the National Education Policy Center website, November 12, 2024

I believe Artificial Intelligence can be a useful element of a teacher’s toolbox, but it won’t be a panacea, nor will it be a huge part of most teacher’s classrooms.

WHAT IT WILL DO IN K-12 EDUCATION

1. Make it a lot easier for teachers to create very targeted materials for lessons.  It’s very easy to use AI to create the “same” text for different lexile levels, data sets for inductive learninggood-and-bad examples to illustrate specific concepts – no more searching online or starting from scratch.

2. Push us teachers to re-evaluate our writing assignments to make them ChatGPT-“resistant.”  Here are some ideas to do just that.  I think that’s probably a positive impact, since I (and suspect many other teachers) often get stuck in a rut of doing the same thing year-after-year.  A push for change can’t hurt.

3. Recognize that despite those lessons, some students may still try to use AI inappropriately, so we need to create preventative measures.  My favorite is having students handwrite a writing assessment three different times a year so I can become familiar with their writing and recognize if assignments have been written with AI.  There are other strategies, including requiring that students use graphic organizers for pre-writing.

4. Be a Godsend for us teachers of high school seniors who are asked to write twenty-plus letters of recommendation each year. See CHATGPT IS A STUDENT LETTER OF RECOMMENDATION MIRACLE!

5. Require many of us to incorporate units to teach about AI, including its biases and responsible used.  See here for some of the lessons I’ve done.  That will also probably include having to include a lesson or two where students actually have to use AI responsibly – here are some ideas for those lessons.

6. Create amazing opportunities for the relatively small number of intrinsically  motivated super high achievers some of us have in our classrooms.  For them, it may very well  be similar to having their own personal tutor.

7. Offer new opportunities for English Language Learners and others who are learning new languages.  In my ELL classes, I use large numbers of peer tutors to provide students personal feedback.  There is no question, in my mind at least (and in others), that the human connection is a key reason for why students attend school.  However, in classes that don’t utilize peer tutors, having students periodically use an online tool for pronunciation, grammar, listening and/or writing practice could be a good activity (perhaps as a warm-up?).  More importantly, for those who are motivated, having access to those tools at home could be a game-changer.

WHAT IT WILL NOT DO IN K-12 EDUCATION

1. It will not “revolutionize” schooling, and you can read people who are much more articulate than me explain why here.

2. Though I think some students can (and will) probably use AI to get feedback on their work before submitting it to teachers, I think it’s unlikely that AI will replace actual teacher-created assessment.  None of us probably enjoy the hours it takes to review student work, but what we see in it informs what what we teach, and our students also deserve a real human reviewing it.  Of course, that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t utilize automatic grading of multiple choice quizzes, as long as we carefully review the results.

3. Unlike what Bill Gates thinks, AI will not “be like a great high school teacher.” There are many reasons why this won’t be the case, including it being unable to build relationships and its inability to apply asset-based instruction  (also see The Best Posts On Looking At Our Students Through The Lens Of Assets & Not Deficits).

Let me know what you think, and [what] I might be missing!

6 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Using Artificial Intelligence in Teaching Writing: A Missed Opportunity? (HP)

HP is a dear friend of mine who prefers anonymity. What he has to say about teaching writing is important for those teachers, administrators, and parents who fret about AI’s effects on students’ writing. HP sees more of an upside than a downside for both teachers and students using AI to write essays, reports, and research papers.

In the rapidly evolving landscape of education, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into classroom instruction has sparked considerable myopia.

Among the most contentious issues is use of AI in teaching writing. Many educators have responded to this technological advance with outright bans, fearing that AI tools like ChatGPT will undermine students’ learning and academic integrity. However, this short-sightedness overlooks the myriad ways AI can enhance the writing process and improve educational outcomes. By forbidding or reducing use of AI, teachers miss a valuable opportunity to enrich their students’ writing and better prepare them for the future.

The primary argument against the use of AI in writing instruction is the concern that it will do the cognitive work for students, thereby stunting their intellectual growth. Critics argue that if students rely on AI to generate ideas, structure essays, or correct grammar, they will not develop the critical thinking and writing skills necessary for academic and professional success. This viewpoint is overly simplistic and fails to recognize the potential of AI as a powerful educational tool.

AI should not be seen as a replacement for human thought, but as a supplement that can enhance the learning process. For instance, AI can provide immediate feedback on writing, helping students identify and correct errors in real-time. This instant feedback loop can accelerate learning, allowing students to understand their mistakes and improve more quickly than they might through traditional methods. Moreover, AI can assist in brainstorming and outlining, helping students organize their thoughts and develop coherent arguments. These are skills that students will still need to master, but with AI, they can do so more efficiently and effectively.

Further, AI can democratize access to high-quality writing instruction. Not all students have the same level of support at home or access to resources like private tutoring. AI tools can level the playing field by providing personalized assistance to every student, regardless of their background. For students who struggle with academic English, AI can offer tailored feedback on word choice and grammar, students improve their writing skills in a supportive and non-judgmental environment. This kind of individualized attention is often impossible in a crowded classroom, but AI makes it feasible.

There is also a broader pedagogical argument to be made. Education should not be about memorizing facts or following rigid procedures but about fostering a love of learning and encouraging intellectual curiosity. AI can play a significant role in this by making the writing process more engaging and interactive. For example, AI can help students explore different writing styles, experiment with new vocabulary, and receive instant feedback on their creative endeavors. This can make writing feel less like a chore and more like an exciting opportunity for self-expression and discovery.

The fear of academic dishonesty is another reason many educators resist the use of AI. They worry that students will use AI to generate entire essays and pass them off as their own work. This is not an insurmountable obstacle. Instead of banning AI, educators should focus on teaching students how to use these tools ethically. This includes understanding the importance of originality, learning how to properly cite AI-generated content, and recognizing the value of their own intellectual contributions. By incorporating lessons on digital literacy and ethical AI use into the curriculum, teachers can help students navigate the complexities of modern technology while maintaining academic integrity.

Moreover, the outright ban on AI overlooks the fact that these tools are becoming increasingly integrated into professional environments. In many industries, AI is used to enhance productivity, streamline workflows, and generate content. By familiarizing students with these tools, educators can better prepare them for the realities of the modern workplace. Teaching students how to use AI responsibly and effectively will give them a competitive edge and equip them with skills that are highly valued in today’s job market.

Finally, decisions forbidding use of AI in the teaching of writing are shortsighted. While concerns about academic integrity and the potential for misuse are valid, they should not overshadow the significant benefits that AI can bring to the educational experience. By embracing AI, educators can provide more personalized, efficient, and engaging writing instruction. They can help students develop critical thinking and writing skills more effectively and prepare them for the demands of the modern world.

Rather than banning AI, secondary teachers should explore how these tools can be integrated into their teaching practices to enhance learning and foster a more dynamic and inclusive educational environment. The future of education lies not in resisting technological advancements but in harnessing their potential to create richer, more meaningful learning experiences for all students.

7 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized