ltning

@[email protected]

I probably won't follow you back, in order to protect this poor machine. Follow one of my other accounts, and I might return the follow there. :)

You can probably find me at @[email protected] and @[email protected] .

For details about this instance, click https://larry.weirdr.net/.
21 ★ 5 ↺

[?]ltning » 🌐
@[email protected]

The ol' 486 has also been upgraded to 11.0-RC2. It's frankly amazing this thing still holds together.


Neofetch output showing the config: NetBSD 11.0 RC2, AMD 486-class CPU, 128MB RAM

Alt...Neofetch output showing the config: NetBSD 11.0 RC2, AMD 486-class CPU, 128MB RAM

    ...

    [?]Nazo » 🌐
    @[email protected]

    @ltning Wow, 128MB of RAM on a 486. I bet that's a huge part of how it's doing as much as it's doing. 😆

      ...
      0 ★ 0 ↺

      [?]ltning » 🌐
      @[email protected]

      Memory: 43M Act, 19M Inact, 12M Wired, 16M Exec, 37M File, 5580K Free
      Swap: 128M Total, 1324K Used, 127M Free / Pools: 41M Used / Network: 8K In, 5K Out

      Yeah. Having RAM helps. But only half of that RAM is even cached ;) I should find a similar board that has 1MB cache.

      Worth mentioning I have NetBSD running on 16MB as well, but I'm not going to run any kind of server on that. ;)

        [?]0x0 » 🌐
        @[email protected]

        @ltning
        What do you use it for?

          ...
          4 ★ 1 ↺

          [?]ltning » 🌐
          @[email protected]

          @[email protected] Well it runs this snac instance, and occasionally I sit down to enjoy some slow computing experiencing the X Window System the way it was meant to be: Simple, twm-like (ctwm, technically) and text-oriented. ;)

            2 ★ 1 ↺

            [?]ltning » 🌐
            @[email protected]

            The : My echo chamber is more diverse than yours!


              [?]DeltaLima 🐧 » 🌐
              @[email protected]

              Mhhh.. crashes when it start's in my Dual Pentium II system. It's performing at start a heavy job "started deferred data integrity check", which does lot IO.
              When I turn off the traffic from outside, it seems to run (takes ages). But when I turn on the traffic to it, it crashes with
              `Illegal instruction (core dumped)`

              I took the installation over from the PIII system and activated the MP kernel. (Do you really have to cp it from the CD by yourself??)

                ...

                [?]Fritz Adalis [he/him] » 🌐
                @[email protected]

                @DeltaLima
                Recent versions of OpenBSD automatically install the right kernel. Are you running a fairly recent version?

                  ...

                  [?]DeltaLima 🐧 » 🌐
                  @[email protected]

                  @FritzAdalis 7.8 downloaded the iso two weeks ago.
                  I took the SSD over from an P III single core system, where I installed it. I thought OpenBSD should be capable as well to get swapped around similar hardware.

                    ...

                    [?]Fritz Adalis [he/him] » 🌐
                    @[email protected]

                    @DeltaLima
                    Usually it can. I'm not sure of the technical reasons for having single vs. multi processor kernels any more, but they should at least boot.

                    (I guess I read what you wrote backwards from what you meant.)

                      ...

                      [?]DeltaLima 🐧 » 🌐
                      @[email protected]

                      @FritzAdalis I've tried the "normal" bsd kernel without mp support again, and it crashes there too :/
                      Looks like I have to do some more debugging.

                        ...

                        [?]Fritz Adalis [he/him] » 🌐
                        @[email protected]

                        @DeltaLima
                        Yeah, it shouldn't crash. Maybe try ktrace/kdump on it and see where it dies, or gdb on the core file if you know how to use it. (I do not.)

                          ...

                          [?]DeltaLima 🐧 » 🌐
                          @[email protected]

                          @FritzAdalis I tried ktrace+kdump but didnt get something out of it. At the end, it gets a SIGILL, after trying to read a json file. I then did a dump with tracing all childs and saw it seemed to read a lot of certificates - so I assume it's doing some SSL stuff and fails there (?) 🤷
                          ```
                          19370 snac PSIG SIGILL SIG_DFL code=ILL_PRVOPC addr=0xa0284f0 trapno=0
                          19370 snac STRU struct stat { dev=10, ino=2728365, mode=-rw-r----- , nlink=2, uid=1001<"snac">, gid=0<"wheel">, rdev=109...
                          ```

                            ...

                            [?]Fritz Adalis [he/him] » 🌐
                            @[email protected]

                            @DeltaLima
                            Ssl... I wonder if it's expecting the cpu to have an instruction that didn't exist then.

                              ...

                              [?]DeltaLima 🐧 » 🌐
                              @[email protected]

                              @FritzAdalis Idk - @ltning is running two servers on similar machines, one with AMD 5x86 and one with dual Pentium on NetBSD. He's also running a patched version, but from what I understood (C programming noob) there was nothing directly ssl related in those commits.
                              I'll try this fork next just for fun.

                                ...

                                [?]Ltning » 🌐
                                @[email protected]

                                @[email protected] @[email protected] I'm currently running the regular version - but on NetBSD, not OpenBSD. Are you building it yourself? Is it possible it links to some system library that is compiled with SSE? But it looks like the SIGILL is in the stat system call which is weird? Or am I misreading that?

                                  [?]Fritz Adalis [he/him] » 🌐
                                  @[email protected]

                                  @DeltaLima @ltning
                                  Hm, Pentium and 5x86 wouldn't have any instructions that a PII doesn't. Could be something that was ripped out of libressl but netbsd is I think still on openssl. Or I'm completely off base and it's just a regular bug.

                                    ...

                                    [?]Ltning » 🌐
                                    @[email protected]

                                    Yeah, but if the binary was built on the PIII, then it will not work on the PII assuming the compiler uses "current machine" as default target..

                                    CC: @[email protected]

                                      ...

                                      [?]Fritz Adalis [he/him] » 🌐
                                      @[email protected]

                                      @ltning @DeltaLima
                                      OpenBSD source will always output the same code independent of the current cpu capabilities, but other code may not.

                                        ...

                                        [?]DeltaLima 🐧 » 🌐
                                        @[email protected]

                                        @FritzAdalis @ltning I think I'll try NetBSD next as troubleshooting step, hope I will find time at the weekend for it. Thank you so far! :)

                                          ...

                                          [?]Ltning » 🌐
                                          @[email protected]

                                          NetBSD is likely to be a fair bit faster than OpenBSD - especially on such old hardware, where most of the various CPU vulnerability mitigations are useless but OpenBSD enables them anyway. T(h)rashing of caches and pipelines for no good reason makes for a suboptimal experience.

                                          You may want to make sure you disable encrypted swap unless you have a ton of RAM. Someone seems to think that if you're on x86 you always have CPU to spare for encryption :D

                                          Also, pkgin is fantastic and many (more than on OpenBSD) packages are built so they work on even an i486.

                                          CC: @[email protected]

                                            2 ★ 0 ↺

                                            [?]ltning » 🌐
                                            @[email protected]

                                            The 5x86 says hi .. and enjoys the attention ;)

                                            CC: @[email protected] @[email protected]

                                              ...
                                              7 ★ 5 ↺

                                              [?]ltning » 🌐
                                              @[email protected]

                                              Upgraded this instance to 2.88 (no, not the floppy format) plus a few commits.. keeps chugging along on this 486. Thank you, @[email protected] :D

                                              Also amazing that this thing did not OOM-kill processes all over the place; even before I started compiling I did a pkgin upgrade on the poor box, which took .. a few hours. I'm all outta swap, real low on RAM, and yet it somehow got through this .. for the win, I guess.

                                              Says top:

                                              Memory: 56M Act, 27M Inact, 11M Wired, 15M Exec, 820K File, 2076K Free
                                              Swap: 128M Total, 128M Used, 4K Free / Pools: 23M Used / Network: 23K In, 34K Out

                                                3 ★ 1 ↺
                                                ltning boosted

                                                [?]ltning » 🌐
                                                @[email protected]

                                                Hey all you fellow desperate leisure-suit-wielding dorkosphere people... Have a good one!


                                                Screenshot from Sierra's 1990 Christmas Card application depicting a stage with Cupid flying above it with his bow and two dead(?) lovers on the floor with arrows sticking out of their backs. 16-color EGA resolution.

                                                Alt...Screenshot from Sierra's 1990 Christmas Card application depicting a stage with Cupid flying above it with his bow and two dead(?) lovers on the floor with arrows sticking out of their backs. 16-color EGA resolution.

                                                  1 ★ 0 ↺
                                                  in reply to »

                                                  [?]ltning » 🌐
                                                  @[email protected]

                                                  Straightest leisure suited guy in gaming says hi!

                                                    History

                                                    Back to top - More...