Hem Raj Kafle
Hem Raj Kafle, an Associate Professor of English and Communication in Kathmandu University, Nepal, is a PhD in English and specializes in rhetoric. He teaches English literature, creative writing, and professional communication. His academic orientations comprise British and American literature, interdisciplinary studies, communication studies and diaspora studies.
less
Related Authors
InterestsView All (14)
Uploads
Papers by Hem Raj Kafle
Key words: rhetorical communication, symbolic convergence, fantasy themes, leadership
writings on editorials, and is presented as a synthesis of different critical perspectives. The text does not aim to provide
a comprehensive guideline for studying editorials, but manages to indicate the features required for a critical inquiry. I
fist underline the basic ideas on editorials, and move on to the analysis of the main rhetorical features, especially the
cultural-ideological stances and structural discursiveness.
Key words: rhetorical aspects, newspaper, discussion.
first concerns the issue of naming, guided by such questions as
whom to call diaspora and under what criteria; the second
extends this process of naming to the establishment of diaspora as a comprehensive theory for studying multiple forms of
migrations. This article outlines the insights of some of the
most repetitively consulted scholars in diaspora studies. My
attempt is to synthesize their conceptualizations into a
representative research framework.
Key words: rhetorical communication, symbolic convergence, fantasy themes, leadership
writings on editorials, and is presented as a synthesis of different critical perspectives. The text does not aim to provide
a comprehensive guideline for studying editorials, but manages to indicate the features required for a critical inquiry. I
fist underline the basic ideas on editorials, and move on to the analysis of the main rhetorical features, especially the
cultural-ideological stances and structural discursiveness.
Key words: rhetorical aspects, newspaper, discussion.
first concerns the issue of naming, guided by such questions as
whom to call diaspora and under what criteria; the second
extends this process of naming to the establishment of diaspora as a comprehensive theory for studying multiple forms of
migrations. This article outlines the insights of some of the
most repetitively consulted scholars in diaspora studies. My
attempt is to synthesize their conceptualizations into a
representative research framework.