
Nimrod Luz
Related Authors
David Henig
Utrecht University
Kristen Hartmann
University College London
Wendy Pullan
University of Cambridge
Dionigi Albera
Aix-Marseille University
Lily Kong
Singapore Management University
Robert M Hayden
University of Pittsburgh
Gruia Badescu
University of Konstanz, Germany
Nurit Stadler
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
InterestsView All (21)
Uploads
Papers by Nimrod Luz
research agenda for geographers of religion in the 21st century. Following a discussion of the
contested nature of scared places, the paper theorises place and scale in the study of religion. It
is argued that by conjugating these two crucial concepts, geographers of religion (and surely
other disciplines as well) would be better able to engage with the rich socio-political-spatial
meanings of contemporary religions. Sacred places, as one of the key features of religion, serve
as an entry point into the current discussion. The empirical context and case studies are drawn
from over two decades of research in the contested region of Israel/Palestine. They serve to
illustrate my main argument that sacred places and their contested nature are central to
understanding broader socio-political processes. I will therefore briefly engage in a scalar
analysis of sacred places from the body to the global scale.
research, progress in national and global policies setting commendable goals towards more
sustainable agriculture is still sluggish. This paper argues that if the efforts continue to concentrate on
farmers and rest solely on “fixing” modes of production at the farm level, the chances of arriving at
significant changes are meagre. By conjugating Lefebvre’s triad of spaces and geographic explorations
on politics of scale with data harvested over three years of qualitative research in farms, this paper
explores Israeli farmers’ conduct in the field as they face many challenges at various scales. The paper
presents their vulnerability against forces on a multiscalar level which present numerous obstacles
in operating their farms. Addressing these challenges to allow them to integrate more sustainable
modes of operation would require upscaling the debate and the taking of responsibility from all
stakeholders concerned, from the farm level to global players.
research agenda for geographers of religion in the 21st century. Following a discussion of the
contested nature of scared places, the paper theorises place and scale in the study of religion. It
is argued that by conjugating these two crucial concepts, geographers of religion (and surely
other disciplines as well) would be better able to engage with the rich socio-political-spatial
meanings of contemporary religions. Sacred places, as one of the key features of religion, serve
as an entry point into the current discussion. The empirical context and case studies are drawn
from over two decades of research in the contested region of Israel/Palestine. They serve to
illustrate my main argument that sacred places and their contested nature are central to
understanding broader socio-political processes. I will therefore briefly engage in a scalar
analysis of sacred places from the body to the global scale.
research, progress in national and global policies setting commendable goals towards more
sustainable agriculture is still sluggish. This paper argues that if the efforts continue to concentrate on
farmers and rest solely on “fixing” modes of production at the farm level, the chances of arriving at
significant changes are meagre. By conjugating Lefebvre’s triad of spaces and geographic explorations
on politics of scale with data harvested over three years of qualitative research in farms, this paper
explores Israeli farmers’ conduct in the field as they face many challenges at various scales. The paper
presents their vulnerability against forces on a multiscalar level which present numerous obstacles
in operating their farms. Addressing these challenges to allow them to integrate more sustainable
modes of operation would require upscaling the debate and the taking of responsibility from all
stakeholders concerned, from the farm level to global players.
This book focuses on contemporary sacred sites and their socio-political meanings for minorities within a hegemonic and a secularizing state-system. It argues that sacred places provide a space that is less scrutinized by the state and where alternative visions of the socio-political may be produced.
A plethora of sites and case studies are examined, including the rural shrine of Maqam abu al-Hijja in the lower Galilee, the Mosque of Hassan Bek in the heart of Tel Aviv-Jaffa and the most disputed sacred place in the region, the Haram al-Sharif in Jerusalem. These sites are explored through mostly a phenomenological lens and in various contexts, from the individual body to the global.
This book offers a critical-analytical study of the socio-political aspects of sacred sites in contemporary societies within the broader understanding of scale and the spatial turn in the study of religion.
הפוליסמיות (ריבוי המשמעויות) של האוכל היא מקור לא אכזב ללימוד העושר של הקיום האנושי. מה שהוא אוכל לאחד הוא רעל לשני אמר לוקרטיוס כבר במאה הראשונה לפני הספירה. וכך למשל נמצא ביערות האמזונס שני שבטים שחיים זה לצד זה. אצל האחד מאכל התאווה הוא הטפיר הצלוי וזה שמתועב על ידם הוא בשר הקוף ואילו אצל שכניהם מתקיים המצב ההופכי. המשמעויות שאנו מייחסים לאוכל והתובנות שלנו ביחס אליו אינן קשורות על פי רוב למרכיב תזונתי כלשהו בתוכו אלא לאופן שבו אוכל מיוצר מובן, מאורגן, מיוצר, משווק ומדומיין על ידינו כחלק מחיינו החברתיים ובוודאי כחלק מהביולוגיה שלנו. נתקשה משום כך למצוא מרכיב נוסף בחיינו שהוא כה מעשיר, מאתגר, מחבר, מפריד ועקרוני לקיום החיים עצמם. וזו בדיוק טענתו המרכזית של ספר זה שמבקש להציג לקוראים בצורה מזמינה ומעוררת תיאבון את האוכל כמרחב המרתק והמשפיע ביותר על חיינו. טענה זו נפרסת בפרקיו השונים של הספר המהווים כל אחד לעצמו דיון קצר ומעורר מחשב על הבט כזה או אחר באשר לאוכל וביחד אסופה שתכליתה לענג את הקוראים ולגרום להם לחשוב ולחשוב שוב על המפגש המתמשך שלהם איתו. פרקי הספר נוצרו בתחילה כפינות לשידור במסגרת התוכנית שלושה שיודעים בכאן תרבות ומו(נ)גשות כאן לקוראים כמזון למחשבה וכחלק מהתובנה שציבור הולך וגדל בעולם האקדמי ומחוצה לו שותפים לה והיא שאנו מחויבים לייצר מחדש את קשרינו עם האוכל שעולה על שולחננו ובדרך זו גם עם עצמנו .
Offers an interdisciplinary approach and new methodologies for the study of historical cities in the Middle East
Broadens the field of urban history to include approaches, theories, and understandings from the social sciences
Extensive survey of the cities' landscape and the construction of an innovative methodology to study historical built environment
My main argument is that the social-ideological-political and the spatial are interdependent and influence each other, and examining spatial changes and emphasizing the spatial-physical-material dimension in interfaith encounters of various kinds helps us approach the (often bloody) reality of these encounters. The reality, of course, is more complex than the dichotomy between conflictual and collaborative approaches, and there are certainly many nuances around the ability for interfaith tolerance and inclusion. The more we succeed in seeing the synergy between social and spatial processes in these encounters, the better we can understand them empirically and theoretically. Therefore, in this lecture, I will begin with a discussion of the spatial turn in social research, move on to critical conceptualizations of what religion is and the questions that arise around interfaith encounters, address various potential spaces for interfaith encounters, and propose a theory for discussion based on two central components in the study of space: place and scale.
The extraordinary power of thinking spatially to explain social processes and actions has inspired a material turn in the study of the urban and a growing engagement with the phenomenological aspects of materiality. Materiality becomes a compelling register wherein to examine urban manifestations, and account for and interact with various structures of social life particularly within cities (Morgan, 2010). There is a mounting awareness, not only of the tangible aspects of our cities, but also of the way material objects are never neutral and devoid of social context or personal subjectivities (Navaro-Yashin 2009, 2012; Knott, Krech and Meyer, 2016). Within the urban context, material aspects become viable and, further explored, can account for both materiality and culture through the conceptualization of the tangible and the phantasmatic in unison by privileging neither one nor the other (Navaro-Yashin, 2012). Thus, a study of a variety of urban materialities, be it a plaza, a wall, religious landmarks, dogs leashes or the entire city at that, provides a framework to try and ask ourselves how these artifacts help us account for a better understanding of cities through the prism of human-non human relations. That said, as part of this endeavor I would hope to voice a few of my theoretical reservations and hiatus encountered in the ethnographic field.
Jews, by Jacob Lassner