
Amy Binder
Related Authors
Aneta Dybska
University of Warsaw
Mary Anne Franks
University of Miami School of Law
Jennifer Asenas
California State University Long Beach
Reshmi Dutt-Ballerstadt
Linfield University
Joseph Yi
Hanyang University
Joseph Mello
DePaul University
Casey Kelly
University of Nebraska Lincoln
Han Koehle
Washington University in St. Louis
InterestsView All (10)
Uploads
Papers by Amy Binder
year at the most selective universities, nearly half the graduating seniors head to a surprisingly narrow band
of professional options. Over the past few decades, this has largely been into the finance and consulting
sectors, but increasingly it also includes high-tech firms. This study uses a cultural-organizational lens to
show how student cultures and campus structures steer large portions of anxious and uncertain students
into high-wealth, high-status occupational sectors. Interviewing 56 students and recent alumni at Harvard
and Stanford Universities, we found that the majority of our respondents experienced confusion about
career paths when first arriving at college but quickly learned what were considered to be the most prestigious
options. On-campus corporate recruitment for finance, consulting, and high-tech jobs functioned as
a significant driver of student perceptions of status; career prestige systems built up among peers exacerbated
the funneling effect into these jobs. From these processes, students learned to draw boundaries
between ‘‘high-status’’ and ‘‘ordinary’’ jobs. Our findings demonstrate how status processes on college
campuses are central in generating preferences for the uppermost positions in the occupational structure
and that elite campus environments have a large, independent role in the production and reproduction of
social inequality.
year at the most selective universities, nearly half the graduating seniors head to a surprisingly narrow band
of professional options. Over the past few decades, this has largely been into the finance and consulting
sectors, but increasingly it also includes high-tech firms. This study uses a cultural-organizational lens to
show how student cultures and campus structures steer large portions of anxious and uncertain students
into high-wealth, high-status occupational sectors. Interviewing 56 students and recent alumni at Harvard
and Stanford Universities, we found that the majority of our respondents experienced confusion about
career paths when first arriving at college but quickly learned what were considered to be the most prestigious
options. On-campus corporate recruitment for finance, consulting, and high-tech jobs functioned as
a significant driver of student perceptions of status; career prestige systems built up among peers exacerbated
the funneling effect into these jobs. From these processes, students learned to draw boundaries
between ‘‘high-status’’ and ‘‘ordinary’’ jobs. Our findings demonstrate how status processes on college
campuses are central in generating preferences for the uppermost positions in the occupational structure
and that elite campus environments have a large, independent role in the production and reproduction of
social inequality.