Skip to main content

Daniel Heider

University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Theology, Department for Philosophy and Religious Studies, Faculty Member

Followers

332

Following

77

Co-authors

9

Public Views

I am Associate Professor and Chair of the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies in the Faculty of Theology, University of South Bohemia (Budweis). My research focuses especially on metaphysics and epistemology in Early Modern Scholastic philosophy.

Areas of Specialization
Early Modern Scholastic Philosophy, Medieval Philosophy

Areas of Competence
Early Modern Philosophy, Philosophy of Mind, Analytical Metaphysics
Supervisors: The supervisor of my dissertation titled "Suárez a jeho metafyzika. Od pojmu jsoucna přes transcendentální jednotu k druhům transcendentální jednoty" was Prof. Stanislav Sousedík.
Address: Faculty of Theology,, Kněžská 8, České Budějovice (Budweis), Czech Republic

less

Claus Asbjørn Andersen

UCLouvain (University of Louvain)

Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic

Marco Forlivesi

Università degli Studi "G. d'Annunzio" Chieti Pescara

Gian Pietro Soliani

Università Ca' Foscari Venezia

Daniel D Novotný

University of South Bohemia

Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic

University of Ostrava

UCLouvain (University of Louvain)

Charles University, Prague

InterestsView All (7)

Uploads

Papers by Daniel Heider

Pain in Second Scholasticism: Cognitive or Affective State

Studia Neoaristotelica, Special Issue, 2024

In hac tractatione auctor tres de doloris sensibilis natura sententias scholasticas exponit, quar... more In hac tractatione auctor tres de doloris sensibilis natura sententias scholasticas exponit, quarum unam Franciscus Suárez (1548-1617), alteram Raphael Aversa (1589-1657), ultimam Bartholomaeus Mas trius (1602-1673) cum Bonaventura Belluto (1600-1676) professi sunt. Auctor duas movet quaestiones principales: quorum prima est, quae sit doloris sensibilis natura, sive aliis verbis, in qua potentia insit; altera, quae sunt doloris adaequatae organicae causae. In tractatione responsionum quas singuli secundae scholasticae auctores proponunt varietas ostenditur.

Fonseca´s Halfway Reductionism of Internal Senses. In Light of Mastri´s and Belluto´s Critique

Pedro da Fonseca Humanism and Metaphysics Simone Guidi, Mário de Carvalho (eds), Turnhout: Brepols, 2023

THE PRODUCTION OF INTELLIGIBLE LIKENESS IN SECOND SCHOLASTICISM: SUÁREZ, MCCAGHWELL, AND MASTRI/BELLUTO

¿Qué es la segunda escolástica?, edited by Simona Langella and Rafael Ramis Barceló, editorial Sindéresis, 2023

The chapter presents three theories of the origin of intelligible species, as elaborated by four ... more The chapter presents three theories of the origin of intelligible species, as elaborated by four Second scholastics. These are the doctrines of Francisco Suárez, Hugh McCaghwell, and Bartolomeo Mastri/Bonaventura Belluto. I argue that the problem of interaction between two distinct substances, sc. between the extended thing and the thinking thing, which plagues Cartesian metaphysics, is structurally similar to the scholastic issue of the causal role of (material) phantasms in the production of (immaterial) intelligible forms. I also claim (1) that Suárez's and McCaghwell's solution based on the notion of occasional causation anticipates Descartes's treatment, and (2) that Suárez's view substantially influenced McCaghwell's view.

Suarez vs Mastri and Belluto on Species in the Internal Sense

Cognitive Issues in the Long Scotist Tradition , 2023

Heider Las caracteristicas doctrinales de la filosofia de la percepción de Suárez Una sinopsis

LA FINALIDAD DE LOS BIENES DE LA TIERRA EN LA ESCUELA DE SALAMANCA, 2022

Acreditado como Profesor Contratado Doctor, cuenta con un sexenio de investigación. Entre las pub... more

The Metaphysics of Perfect Vital Acts in Second Scholasticism

ACPQ, 2022

In this paper I deal with the issues in Second Scholasticism of the nature, genesis and creatabil... more In this paper I deal with the issues in Second Scholasticism of the nature, genesis and creatability of perfect vital acts of cognition and appetition in vital powers. I present the theories of Francisco Suárez (1548-1617), Raffaele Aversa (1589-1657), and Bartolomeo Mastri (1602-1673) together with Bonaventura Belluto (1603-1676). I show that while for Aversa these acts are action-like items merely emanating from the soul and vital powers and as such cannot be produced from the outside, even by God, for Mastri and Belluto they are absolute qualities proceeding from their principles by efficient causation proper, which is a kind of procession that can be replaced by God. I argue that Suárez's position attempts to steer a middle ground between these two theories.

Suárez y algunos escotistas barrocos sobre la autoconciencia perceptual

Daniel Heider, 2022

Resumen. Este artículo trata la cuestión de la autoconciencia sensible, específicamente la cuesti... more Resumen. Este artículo trata la cuestión de la autoconciencia sensible, específicamente la cuestión de si una teoría plausible de la autopercepción sensible que requiere sensaciones externas como objetos implica que se necesiten a su vez especies sensibles que representen esos actos. Introduciré en primer términos dos perspectivas distintas de Aristóteles, tomadas de Sobre el alma y Del sueño y la vigilia (las que definen el status quaestionis escolástico). En segundo lugar trataré los enfoques de Francisco

SENTIDOS INTERNOS, APETITO SENSITIVO Y VIRTUDES CARDINALES EN CAYETANO Y SUÁREZ

Estudio Filosóficos vol. 68, n. 198, 2019

The paper deals with two important philosophers of the Renaissance, Cajetan and Suárez, who repre... more The paper deals with two important philosophers of the Renaissance, Cajetan and Suárez, who represent important movements in the scholastic thought. It focuses on the topics of philosophical psychology, more precisely on the relationship between the sensory and the intellectual parts of the soul with respect to the moral evaluation of human action. The difference between the two thinkers is manifested mainly in the location of the moral virtues either in the will or in the sensitive appetite.

Suárez´s metaphysics of cognitive act

Heider_Jesuit Psychology and Theory of Knowledge.pdf

Debates about external and internal senses: In the Direction of Francisco Suárez (1548-1617)

Philosophy of Mind in the Late Middle Ages and Renaissance The History of the Philosophy of Mind,... more

francisco suárez on pain and Touch

In the study the author aims at two main things. First, he points out an (at least) potential doc... more In the study the author aims at two main things. First, he points out an (at least) potential doctrinal incoherence in Suárez's statements concerning the issue of the proper sensible object of touch. While in the context of his treatment of the sense of touch in DA vII, 13-14 Suárez restricts the total object of touch to external (tangent) qualities, in DA XI, 2, when treating the issue of emotions, the Jesuit includes also the qualitas dolorifera, i.e., a quality inherent in the percipient's body. The author states that Suárez's inconsistence is more urgent if his formulations are compared with those of Fran-cisco de Oviedo. Second, the author indicates that Suárez's «mixed view of pain», combining both the perceptual and the affective aspects in the single experience of pain, is a kind of theory that can be regarded as an up-to-date position even in the contemporary debate among analytic philosophers. Dolor y tacto en Francisco Suárez

SUÁREZ ON THE FUNCTIONAL SCOPE OF THE IMAGINATIVE POWER

ABSTRACT Against the background of Thomas Aquinas's distribution of cognitive functions to four r... more ABSTRACT Against the background of Thomas Aquinas's distribution of cognitive functions to four really distinct interior senses – the common sense, the phantasy alias the imagination , the cogitative power and the memory alias the reminiscence –, I present Francisco Suárez's substantial reduction of the cognitive scope of his single internal sense, which he calls phantasia. I will claim that the main reasons for such curtailing which is not concerned only with the reduction of the number of interior senses are Suárez's theory of the efficient causality of the soul and his specific concept of the intellect and its object.

El Concepto de ser en Suárez: ¿unívoco o análogo?

2007) 21-41. Esta versión en castellano ha sido específi camente preparada para su publicación en... more 2007) 21-41. Esta versión en castellano ha sido específi camente preparada para su publicación en el volumen n. 40 de Studium, dedicado a "Suárez en perspectiva", en el 400 aniversario de Francisco Suárez. Studium. Filosofía y Teología 40 (2017) 99-120 El concepto de ser en Suárez: ¿unívoco o análogo? Studium. Filosofía y Teología 40 (2017) 99-120 Daniel Heider

The Internal Sense(s) in Early Jesuit Scholasticism 1

In the background of the medieval theory of internal senses of Avicenna and Aquinas the author pr... more In the background of the medieval theory of internal senses of Avicenna and Aquinas the author presents a survey of the theories of internal senses as advocated by the early Jesuits, namely by Francisco de Toledo (1534–1596), Manuel de Góis (1543–1597), one of the so-called Conimbricenses, and Francisco Suárez (1548–1617). Although all these Jesuits consider Aquinas’s tenet of the four really distinct interior senses to be the probable view, everyone takes against it a more or less reductionist stance. In Suárez this eliminativist approach even results in the theory of the single interior sense called phantasy. In conclusion, this Jesuit reductionism is compared to the Zeitgeist of the classical early modern philosophy exemplified by the names of Descartes and Locke.

Suárez on sound and hearing

The author analyses Suárez's theory of sound and hearing as presented in the sixth, eighth and ni... more The author analyses Suárez's theory of sound and hearing as presented in the sixth, eighth and ninth questions of the seventh disputation of the Jesuit's Commentary on Aristotle's De anima. In the study, Suárez's stances to the following issues are laid out: 1) the nature, cause and subject of sound; 2) the kinds of media of sound and the manner of its dilatation in medio; and 3) the organ of hearing.

Suárez on Visual Perception

This paper surveys the main issues in Suárez's theory of visual perception, which in its complexi... more This paper surveys the main issues in Suárez's theory of visual perception, which in its complexity and systematical ordering has not been explored yet. These questions, exposed in the first five questions of the seventh disputation De sensibus ex-terioribus in particulari of Suárez's Commentaria una cum quaestionibus in libros Aristotelis and in the first two sections of the fifth disputation De potentiis cognoscitivis in communi, are the following: 1) the nature of light; 2) the nature of colour; 3) the formal (adequate) object of vision; 4) the necessity and the nature of the visual species; 5) the critique of the theory of extramission; and 6) the organ of visual power. The main emphasis is laid on the presentation of the systematical dimension of Suárez's visual theory.

Suárez et Descarter sur la perception visuelle

De prime abord nous pourrions avoir l'impression que la comparaison de la théorie visuelle de Fra... more De prime abord nous pourrions avoir l'impression que la comparaison de la théorie visuelle de François Suárez et de celle de René Descartes ne peut conduire qu'à l'affirmation d'une diversité radicale entre les pensées de ces deux auteurs 1 . La conception mécaniste cartésienne fondée sur la théorie de l'image rétinienne, liée au dualisme cartésien de l'esprit et du corps, se montre tout à fait incompatible avec une explication fondée sur l'hylémorphisme et sur les puissances cognitives sensibles qui suppose l'existence des qualités extra-mentales et les espèces intentionnelles sensibles ( species sensibilis ) et qui s'appuie sur la différence fondamentale entre les objets sensibles propres et les objets sensibles communs ( sensibile proprium, sensibile commune ). On déduit la même conclusion concernant la différence entre Suárez et Descartes également du contexte épistémologique. Tandis que dans la philosophie péripatéticienne, sur laquelle se fonde la position de Suárez, la perception sensible représente le point de départ de la connaissance du monde externe, pour Descartes la vision sensible est une source principale d'erreur et d'incertitude. La connaissance sensible, souvent désignée par Descartes comme « sombre et confuse », est pour lui une source de difficultés épistémologiques principales.

Suárez on the Lower External Senses

The Notitia Intuitiva and Notitia Abstractiva of the External Senses in Second Scholasticism: Suárez, Poinsot and Francisco de Oviedo, Vivarium, Volume 54, Issue 2-3, 2016, 173-203.

Pain in Second Scholasticism: Cognitive or Affective State

Studia Neoaristotelica, Special Issue, 2024

In hac tractatione auctor tres de doloris sensibilis natura sententias scholasticas exponit, quar... more In hac tractatione auctor tres de doloris sensibilis natura sententias scholasticas exponit, quarum unam Franciscus Suárez (1548-1617), alteram Raphael Aversa (1589-1657), ultimam Bartholomaeus Mas trius (1602-1673) cum Bonaventura Belluto (1600-1676) professi sunt. Auctor duas movet quaestiones principales: quorum prima est, quae sit doloris sensibilis natura, sive aliis verbis, in qua potentia insit; altera, quae sunt doloris adaequatae organicae causae. In tractatione responsionum quas singuli secundae scholasticae auctores proponunt varietas ostenditur.

Fonseca´s Halfway Reductionism of Internal Senses. In Light of Mastri´s and Belluto´s Critique

Pedro da Fonseca Humanism and Metaphysics Simone Guidi, Mário de Carvalho (eds), Turnhout: Brepols, 2023

THE PRODUCTION OF INTELLIGIBLE LIKENESS IN SECOND SCHOLASTICISM: SUÁREZ, MCCAGHWELL, AND MASTRI/BELLUTO

¿Qué es la segunda escolástica?, edited by Simona Langella and Rafael Ramis Barceló, editorial Sindéresis, 2023

The chapter presents three theories of the origin of intelligible species, as elaborated by four ... more The chapter presents three theories of the origin of intelligible species, as elaborated by four Second scholastics. These are the doctrines of Francisco Suárez, Hugh McCaghwell, and Bartolomeo Mastri/Bonaventura Belluto. I argue that the problem of interaction between two distinct substances, sc. between the extended thing and the thinking thing, which plagues Cartesian metaphysics, is structurally similar to the scholastic issue of the causal role of (material) phantasms in the production of (immaterial) intelligible forms. I also claim (1) that Suárez's and McCaghwell's solution based on the notion of occasional causation anticipates Descartes's treatment, and (2) that Suárez's view substantially influenced McCaghwell's view.

Suarez vs Mastri and Belluto on Species in the Internal Sense

Cognitive Issues in the Long Scotist Tradition , 2023

Heider Las caracteristicas doctrinales de la filosofia de la percepción de Suárez Una sinopsis

LA FINALIDAD DE LOS BIENES DE LA TIERRA EN LA ESCUELA DE SALAMANCA, 2022

Acreditado como Profesor Contratado Doctor, cuenta con un sexenio de investigación. Entre las pub... more

The Metaphysics of Perfect Vital Acts in Second Scholasticism

ACPQ, 2022

In this paper I deal with the issues in Second Scholasticism of the nature, genesis and creatabil... more In this paper I deal with the issues in Second Scholasticism of the nature, genesis and creatability of perfect vital acts of cognition and appetition in vital powers. I present the theories of Francisco Suárez (1548-1617), Raffaele Aversa (1589-1657), and Bartolomeo Mastri (1602-1673) together with Bonaventura Belluto (1603-1676). I show that while for Aversa these acts are action-like items merely emanating from the soul and vital powers and as such cannot be produced from the outside, even by God, for Mastri and Belluto they are absolute qualities proceeding from their principles by efficient causation proper, which is a kind of procession that can be replaced by God. I argue that Suárez's position attempts to steer a middle ground between these two theories.

Suárez y algunos escotistas barrocos sobre la autoconciencia perceptual

Daniel Heider, 2022

Resumen. Este artículo trata la cuestión de la autoconciencia sensible, específicamente la cuesti... more Resumen. Este artículo trata la cuestión de la autoconciencia sensible, específicamente la cuestión de si una teoría plausible de la autopercepción sensible que requiere sensaciones externas como objetos implica que se necesiten a su vez especies sensibles que representen esos actos. Introduciré en primer términos dos perspectivas distintas de Aristóteles, tomadas de Sobre el alma y Del sueño y la vigilia (las que definen el status quaestionis escolástico). En segundo lugar trataré los enfoques de Francisco

SENTIDOS INTERNOS, APETITO SENSITIVO Y VIRTUDES CARDINALES EN CAYETANO Y SUÁREZ

Estudio Filosóficos vol. 68, n. 198, 2019

The paper deals with two important philosophers of the Renaissance, Cajetan and Suárez, who repre... more The paper deals with two important philosophers of the Renaissance, Cajetan and Suárez, who represent important movements in the scholastic thought. It focuses on the topics of philosophical psychology, more precisely on the relationship between the sensory and the intellectual parts of the soul with respect to the moral evaluation of human action. The difference between the two thinkers is manifested mainly in the location of the moral virtues either in the will or in the sensitive appetite.

Suárez´s metaphysics of cognitive act

Heider_Jesuit Psychology and Theory of Knowledge.pdf

Debates about external and internal senses: In the Direction of Francisco Suárez (1548-1617)

Philosophy of Mind in the Late Middle Ages and Renaissance The History of the Philosophy of Mind,... more

francisco suárez on pain and Touch

In the study the author aims at two main things. First, he points out an (at least) potential doc... more In the study the author aims at two main things. First, he points out an (at least) potential doctrinal incoherence in Suárez's statements concerning the issue of the proper sensible object of touch. While in the context of his treatment of the sense of touch in DA vII, 13-14 Suárez restricts the total object of touch to external (tangent) qualities, in DA XI, 2, when treating the issue of emotions, the Jesuit includes also the qualitas dolorifera, i.e., a quality inherent in the percipient's body. The author states that Suárez's inconsistence is more urgent if his formulations are compared with those of Fran-cisco de Oviedo. Second, the author indicates that Suárez's «mixed view of pain», combining both the perceptual and the affective aspects in the single experience of pain, is a kind of theory that can be regarded as an up-to-date position even in the contemporary debate among analytic philosophers. Dolor y tacto en Francisco Suárez

SUÁREZ ON THE FUNCTIONAL SCOPE OF THE IMAGINATIVE POWER

ABSTRACT Against the background of Thomas Aquinas's distribution of cognitive functions to four r... more ABSTRACT Against the background of Thomas Aquinas's distribution of cognitive functions to four really distinct interior senses – the common sense, the phantasy alias the imagination , the cogitative power and the memory alias the reminiscence –, I present Francisco Suárez's substantial reduction of the cognitive scope of his single internal sense, which he calls phantasia. I will claim that the main reasons for such curtailing which is not concerned only with the reduction of the number of interior senses are Suárez's theory of the efficient causality of the soul and his specific concept of the intellect and its object.

El Concepto de ser en Suárez: ¿unívoco o análogo?

2007) 21-41. Esta versión en castellano ha sido específi camente preparada para su publicación en... more 2007) 21-41. Esta versión en castellano ha sido específi camente preparada para su publicación en el volumen n. 40 de Studium, dedicado a "Suárez en perspectiva", en el 400 aniversario de Francisco Suárez. Studium. Filosofía y Teología 40 (2017) 99-120 El concepto de ser en Suárez: ¿unívoco o análogo? Studium. Filosofía y Teología 40 (2017) 99-120 Daniel Heider

The Internal Sense(s) in Early Jesuit Scholasticism 1

In the background of the medieval theory of internal senses of Avicenna and Aquinas the author pr... more In the background of the medieval theory of internal senses of Avicenna and Aquinas the author presents a survey of the theories of internal senses as advocated by the early Jesuits, namely by Francisco de Toledo (1534–1596), Manuel de Góis (1543–1597), one of the so-called Conimbricenses, and Francisco Suárez (1548–1617). Although all these Jesuits consider Aquinas’s tenet of the four really distinct interior senses to be the probable view, everyone takes against it a more or less reductionist stance. In Suárez this eliminativist approach even results in the theory of the single interior sense called phantasy. In conclusion, this Jesuit reductionism is compared to the Zeitgeist of the classical early modern philosophy exemplified by the names of Descartes and Locke.

Suárez on sound and hearing

The author analyses Suárez's theory of sound and hearing as presented in the sixth, eighth and ni... more The author analyses Suárez's theory of sound and hearing as presented in the sixth, eighth and ninth questions of the seventh disputation of the Jesuit's Commentary on Aristotle's De anima. In the study, Suárez's stances to the following issues are laid out: 1) the nature, cause and subject of sound; 2) the kinds of media of sound and the manner of its dilatation in medio; and 3) the organ of hearing.

Suárez on Visual Perception

This paper surveys the main issues in Suárez's theory of visual perception, which in its complexi... more This paper surveys the main issues in Suárez's theory of visual perception, which in its complexity and systematical ordering has not been explored yet. These questions, exposed in the first five questions of the seventh disputation De sensibus ex-terioribus in particulari of Suárez's Commentaria una cum quaestionibus in libros Aristotelis and in the first two sections of the fifth disputation De potentiis cognoscitivis in communi, are the following: 1) the nature of light; 2) the nature of colour; 3) the formal (adequate) object of vision; 4) the necessity and the nature of the visual species; 5) the critique of the theory of extramission; and 6) the organ of visual power. The main emphasis is laid on the presentation of the systematical dimension of Suárez's visual theory.

Suárez et Descarter sur la perception visuelle

De prime abord nous pourrions avoir l'impression que la comparaison de la théorie visuelle de Fra... more De prime abord nous pourrions avoir l'impression que la comparaison de la théorie visuelle de François Suárez et de celle de René Descartes ne peut conduire qu'à l'affirmation d'une diversité radicale entre les pensées de ces deux auteurs 1 . La conception mécaniste cartésienne fondée sur la théorie de l'image rétinienne, liée au dualisme cartésien de l'esprit et du corps, se montre tout à fait incompatible avec une explication fondée sur l'hylémorphisme et sur les puissances cognitives sensibles qui suppose l'existence des qualités extra-mentales et les espèces intentionnelles sensibles ( species sensibilis ) et qui s'appuie sur la différence fondamentale entre les objets sensibles propres et les objets sensibles communs ( sensibile proprium, sensibile commune ). On déduit la même conclusion concernant la différence entre Suárez et Descartes également du contexte épistémologique. Tandis que dans la philosophie péripatéticienne, sur laquelle se fonde la position de Suárez, la perception sensible représente le point de départ de la connaissance du monde externe, pour Descartes la vision sensible est une source principale d'erreur et d'incertitude. La connaissance sensible, souvent désignée par Descartes comme « sombre et confuse », est pour lui une source de difficultés épistémologiques principales.

Suárez on the Lower External Senses

The Notitia Intuitiva and Notitia Abstractiva of the External Senses in Second Scholasticism: Suárez, Poinsot and Francisco de Oviedo, Vivarium, Volume 54, Issue 2-3, 2016, 173-203.

Cognitive Issues in the Long Scotist Tradition

by Claus Asbjørn Andersen and Daniel Heider

Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy 5, 2023

The late-scholastic school of Scotism (after John Duns Scotus, † 1308) had considerable room for ... more The late-scholastic school of Scotism (after John Duns Scotus, † 1308) had considerable room for disagreement. This volume innovatively demonstrates just how vividly Scotist philosophers and theologians discussed cognitive matters from the 14th until the 17th century. It further shows how the Scotist ideas were received in Protestant and Reformed milieus.

Introduction
1. Claus A. Andersen: Short Introduction to a Long Tradition – And to this Volume
I. Sensory Cognition
2. Daniel Heider: Suárez vs. Mastri and Belluto on Species in the Internal Sense
3. David González Ginocchio: The Estimative Faculty in Scotus and Scotism
II. Intellectual Cognition
4. Giorgio Pini: In God’s Mind – Divine Cognition in Duns Scotus and Some Early Scotists
5. Marina Fedeli: The Species Intelligibilis in the Cognitive Process in Early Scotism – The Case of William of Alnwick
6. Damian Park O.F.M.: The Non-Beatific Vision of God in the Present Life – Franciscus de Mayronis’s Relational Theory of Cognition
7. Anna Tropia: Francisco Macedo on Intuitive and Abstractive Cognition
III. Metaphysical and Theological Implications
8. Richard Cross: Esse intentionale in Some Early Scotists – At the Origins of the So-called ‘Supertranscendental’
9. Francesco Fiorentino: Esse cognitum and Divine Ideas in the First Two Centuries of Scotism
10. Roberto Hofmeister Pich: Alfonso Briceño on Cognition, Distinction, and the Knowledge of God
11. Lukáš Novák: Making Room for the Virtual Distinction – Bartolomeo Mastri between Scylla and Charybdis
12. Claus A. Andersen: Decretum Concomitans – Bartolomeo Mastri on Divine Cognition and Human Freedom
IV. The Influence of Scotism
13. Ueli Zahnd: The Epistemological Limits of Religious Images – On the Scotist Sources of a Reformed Theological Tenet
14. Arthur Huiban: Melanchthon and the Will – An Early Protestant Reception of Scotist Psychology?
15. Giovanni Gellera: Univocity of Being, the Cogito and Idealism in Johannes Clauberg (1622-1665)

Heider Andersen Cognitive Issues in the Long Scotist Tradition

Cognitive Issues in the Long Scotist Tradition, 2023

Heider Aristotelian Subjectivism Francisco Suárez’s Philosophy of Perception

Aristotelian Subjectivism. Francisco Suárez’s Philosophy of Perception

Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind , Springer

Perception in Scholastics and Their Interlocutors (2017)

by Lukáš Lička, Marek Otisk, and Daniel Heider

Filosofický časopis (2017, Special Issue 2), 2017

The edition of this special issue is a result of the research funded by the Czech Science Foundat... more The edition of this special issue is a result of the research funded by the Czech Science Foundation as the project GA ČR 14-37038G "Between Renaissance and Baroque: Philosophy and Knowledge in the Czech Lands within the Wider European Context" and by the University of Ostrava, the project IRP 201548 "Collective Identity in the Social Networks of Medieval Europe". All articles have been peer reviewed. All rights reserved. This volume can be bought, i. a., through the e-shop of the FILOSOFIA publishing house at filosofia.flu.cas.cz or via

Suárez a jeho metafyzika. Od pojmu jsoucna přes transcendentální jednotu k druhům transcendentální jednoty

60 "Ἐπίστασθαι δὲ οἰόµεθ᾽ ἕκαστον ἁπλῶς, ἀλλὰ µὴ τὸν σοφιστικὸν τρόπον τὸν κατὰ συµβεβηκός, ὅταν ... more 60 "Ἐπίστασθαι δὲ οἰόµεθ᾽ ἕκαστον ἁπλῶς, ἀλλὰ µὴ τὸν σοφιστικὸν τρόπον τὸν κατὰ συµβεβηκός, ὅταν τήν τ᾽ αἰτίαν οἰώµεθα γινώσκειν δι᾽ ῆν τὸ πρᾶγμά ἐστιν ... φαμὲν δὲ καὶ δι᾽ ἀποδείξεως εἰδέναι." Ross, W. D. (ed.), Aristotle's Prior and Posterior Analytics, Clarendon Press, Oxford 2001 (a revised text with introduction and commentary), 71b9-11; 71b19-20. 61 "Major constat, quia hoc est munus scientiae, demonstrare, scilicet, proprietates de subjecto suo, quas debet per causas demonstrare, ut sit perfecta scientia, ut constat ex 1 Poster. Minor autem quoad priorem partem patet, quia ens in quantum ens ita abstractum includitur per se et essentialiter in omni ente, et in omni modo vel proprietate cujuslibet entis; ergo non potest habere proprietatem ita adaequatam et propriam, quia subjectum non potest esse de essentia suae proprietatis. Quoad posteriorem autem partem probatur, quia ens in quantum ens complectitur Deum, qui est sine principio et sine causa; ergo ens in quantum ens non potest habere principia et causas, quia alioqui talia principia et causae deberent convenire omni enti, quia quod convenit superiori in quantum tale est, debet convenire omni contenti sub illo."

Cognitive Psychology in Early Jesuit Scholasticism

Pluralita tradic od antiky po novověk - Supplementum II "Studia Neoaristotelica"

Universals in Second Scholasticism. A comparative study with focus on the theories of Francisco Suárez S. J. (1548–1617), João Poinsot O. P. (1589–1644) and Bartolomeo Mastri da Meldola O.F.M. Conv. (1602–1673)/Bonaventura Belluto O.F.M. Conv. (1600–1676)

Univerzálie ve Scholastice (Universals in Scholasticism) - Supplementum I "Studia Neoaristotelica"

Kdo byl František Suárez? Život a dílo "Vynikajícího doktora"

by Nakladatelství Refugium and Daniel Heider

V knižní podobě je publikace k dispozici zde: http://www.refugium.cz/obchod/produkt/Kdo-byl-Frant... more

Fonseca’s Halfway Reductionism of Internal Senses

by Daniel Heider and Mário Santiago de Carvalho

Pedro da Fonseca. Humanism and Metaphysic, Brepols, 2022

Doctoral studies in Philosophy with the special focus on Second scholasticism at the Faculty of Theology, USB, with generous scholarship

THE ANNUAL PHILOSOPHICAL BUDWEIS -BAMBERG WORKSHOP

by Claus Asbjørn Andersen, Daniel Heider, Ehsan Arzroomchilar, and Nenad Milicic

Cognitive Issues in the Long Scotist Tradition

by Daniel Heider and Claus Asbjørn Andersen

Francisco Suárez: Metaphysics, Politics and Ethics

by Simone Guidi, Mário Santiago de Carvalho, Daniel Heider, and Emanuele Lacca

Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra - Coleção Ideia, 2020

This volume publishes the Proceedings of the 1st International Meeting "Thinking Baroque in Portu... more This volume publishes the Proceedings of the 1st International Meeting "Thinking Baroque in Portugal" (26-28 June 2017), which dealt with the metaphysical, ethical and political thought of Francisco Suárez. Thanks to the collaboration of some of the most important international specialists in the work and thought of Suárez, this volume celebrates the 400th anniversary of his death and underlines his amazing philosophical and theological legacy.