Top.Mail.Ru
? ?
jaybee_bug, posts by tag: cooking - LiveJournal [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
jaybee_bug

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

CUPCAKES! (Lemon edition) [Apr. 14th, 2012|01:56 pm]
jaybee_bug
[Tags|]
[Current Mood |happyhappy]

After my 'baked bads' cupcake/muffin experiments, which yeilded less-than-entirely-tasty-treats, I felt like making some normal cupcakes that actually were meant to taste good. If for nothing more than to prove to the people who had to endure taste-testing the last ones that I can in fact make decent-tasting ones as well. XD But also this was made for a special event.

All you need is a cup of flour. . .Collapse )
Link4 comments|Leave a comment

Baked Bads, Take Two (aka, I don't think you're meant to bake with gummi worms) [Mar. 6th, 2012|03:09 pm]
jaybee_bug
[Tags|, ]

I've run into a couple YouTube videos since my last attempt, where I found, not surprisingly, I was not the first to attempt this sort of thing. One intrepid soul used real live mealworms in his version. I admire the authenticity and bravery, if not the wisdom. ;)

I also learned there was apparently a recipe that could be found on Equestria Daily, as seen in this video. As everyone seems to be calling these muffins Baked Bads, I will use that name as well. However, since my goal has been an edible version of these muffins, I will call my specific recipe attempts Not-So-Bad Baked Bads.

Some notes on my last attempt and how it changed my plans for my second attempt:

*I ditched the idea of it having a chocolate base (does not go well with lemon juice) and chose a standard muffin base

*I stuck with muffins, didn't try for a cupcake recipe. Although there admittedly are advantages to cupcake frosting (I still may later try a grey-colored frosting with 'hair' and 'worms' poking out), muffins ARE cooler. I'm so sorry for ever doubting that, I don't know what got into me, please forgive me Derpy XD

*I don't know if there was something wrong with the original recipe I used last time, but I'm pretty convinced those cupcakes were undercooked. Maybe my oven wasn't hot enough, maybe I mixed the batter too much, who knows. I ran my oven a bit hotter and was careful not to overmix this time though

Anyway, recipe and notes follow.

Muuuuuuffinnnnnnsssssss!Collapse )
Link2 comments|Leave a comment

Ugh, wheatworms? That must be fancy talk for earthworms! [Feb. 17th, 2012|03:52 pm]
jaybee_bug
[Tags|, ]

Ummm, soooo, yeah. My latest food experiment. I modified an existing recipe for chocolate cupcakes, and tried out the modifications today.Cupcake recipe inspired by MLP: FiMCollapse )
LinkLeave a comment

Pumpkin Pie Ice Cream [Oct. 23rd, 2011|08:30 pm]
jaybee_bug
[Tags|]
[Current Mood |groggygroggy]

I wrote a blog entry on the ice cream I made. Then I realized it was quite terribly boring. But oh well.

If you want to read it anyway, and see a nice pumkpin pie ice cream recipe, click here.Collapse )
LinkLeave a comment

Bacon-Laced Chocolate Cupcakes [Sep. 21st, 2011|06:48 pm]
jaybee_bug
[Tags|, ]
[Current Music |The Section Quartet]

So, next in my cooking adventures, I wanted to try making bacon-laced chocolate cupcakes.

Before you say anything, this wasn't just my idea, I actually saw a recipe in a magazine for it. No, I don't remember what magazine. But I swear it's true! I-- oh, wait, that's right, Google exists. Let's see if I can find it . . .

Right, it apparently was Better Homes and Gardens, but please don't take that as advertisement for their magazine. My mom gets it, I don't, I was just flipping through because I was bored. :P

Anyway! That recipe looked like way too much work, doing it from scratch and all, so I modified it. I bought a box of ready-made chocolate cake mix (the kind you just add water, eggs, and a buttload of vegetable oil to), some ready-made chocolate frosting, and some BACON.

Yes.

So I got the instant-mix all made up (there may or may not have been an incident where the metal brand button on the end of my electric mixer decided to FALL OFF and INTO the batter while it was mixing and attempt to grind itself into oblivion . . .) and while the cupcakes were baking in the oven, I fried three pieces of bacon, drained off the grease, and chopped the bacon up into fine bits. (The smell of chocolate cupcakes and bacon cooking simultaneously certainly was an interesting experience.) Then I got about two generous tablespoons (perhaps a bit more) of chocolate frosting and mixed some bacon drippings in with it, since the recipe I had found had suggested to do so. I tasted the mixture, but the taste of the frosting was way too overpowering for the drippings to make any difference. I could tell it wouldn't matter how much bacon grease I used, it wouldn't matter. Anyway, that ready-made shelf-stable chocolate frosting has tons of oil already in it, I didn't want to add much more. So I just mixed in two pieces of bacon's worth of bacon bits into the mixture. Then I frosted one of the cupcakes with it, and gave it a taste-test.

It's . . . surprisingly not revolting. Actually, my main concern was that you wouldn't be able to taste the bacon anyway, so it wouldn't matter, because chocolate is so strong. But you actually can taste the bacon bits! The combination is fascinating. I mean, bacon . . . chocolate . . . what's not to love?

I'm gonna try to take some to a potlock-type thing, although I did make some non-bacon ones as well, since I figured I ought to warn any potential vegetarians or people who don't feel quite so adventurous. I mean, sure, it would be amusing to give one to somebody without warning them (you can't see the bacon at all in it, it just looks like mildly lumpy frosting), but I'd only try that on a non-vegetarian friend of mine who I knew well enough to be cruel to.

Anyway, it was a surprisingly very effective recipe. If anyone tries to do this, I recommend not being afraid to mix a lot of bacon in with the chocolate frosting. (You may wince in horror the first time you dump the bacon bits into the chocolate frosting, since something feels fundamentally Not Right about it, but you gotta push past that.) I added some more after my taste test, so it was two and a half pieces of bacon in roughly two tablespoons of frosting, but it's easy to just eye it and add the desired amount. You'll want enough so you can actually taste the bacon, after all-- I can tell from the original recipe I looked at, there did not seem a high enough bacon-to-frosting ratio to really get that bacon . . . baconness. XD

BACON!
LinkLeave a comment

Recipe Review - Treacle Pudding [Jul. 23rd, 2011|09:45 pm]
jaybee_bug
[Tags|]

So, as a self-confessed anglophile and someone who's been doing a lot of research lately into the Victorian/Edwardian eras of England's history, I thought a little more hands-on approach to my research was warranted. I wanted to try some of this treacle pudding I've heard so much about, and naturally, I had to try it freshly made. I am aware of canned boiled/sponge puddings but I can't imagine that's going to be anywhere near as good as the real thing.

There is a recipe I have from a book, (Food and Cooking in Victorian England) but its solution for those of us who do not own a pudding basin (read: most of us) seemed excessively awkward. I googled for an alternative and I saw a popular approach to making the boiling of the pudding really easy was to use a rice cooker.

"Huzzah!" says I, "For I have a rice cooker!"

So I procured the needed foodstuffs, most of which were easy to obtain, save but one item. The rather vital treacle, for which the pudding gets its name. This I obtained on Amazon (Lyle's Black Treacle) in a real pretty looking tin. For those of you unaware, treacle is very similar to blackstrap molasses, but I wanted this to be as authentic as possible, so I sprung for the real thing.

The recipe I used was this one I ran across while googling. The site does blather on about Harry Potter for a bit, but you can just ignore that part and concentrate on the actual recipe. It's a bit vague on the cooking time, not really indicating how long to boil the pudding in the rice cooker, which I think is quite an oversight, but as it turned out, that would become a moot point for me. I realized I don't have a rice cooker anyway, I have a rice steamer. I had not realized there was a difference until I'd stared at the recipe long enough. (Though now I am curious, would steaming a pudding work??)

So! There goes plan A. Plan B was to use the microwave, as the recipe included a microwave option. The idea of course dismayed me, for I wanted to be authentic, and this did not smack of old world charm to stick something in the microwave. But I am also lazy. So it is a compromise. Later on I might work out a means of proper boiling. I was also hesitant because it didn't sound like it would even work in the microwave, but I gave it a shot anyway.

I didn't have a 1-quart bowl, so I decided to divide the batter and cook two smaller puddings instead and just use a cereal bowl as the pudding mold. This required me to cut the cooking time in half for the microwave (down to 3-4 minutes) and hope it would work out OK, and also hope there was enough room leftover in the bowl for expansion of the pudding. I wasn't sure if by "cover with a piece of parchment" the directions meant that it should be perfectly sealed or just covered (well, this wasn't being boiled, so there should be no reason to have it sealed; on the contrary, I made sure there was a bit of a vent for steam).

I was quite worried about hot spots making burn holes in the pudding. My microwave is bloody ancient, and it has no turntable. Heck, the thing probably is leaking microwave radiation and cooking my brains everytime I use it anyway. :oP But anyway, I gave the bowl a quarter-turn every 30 seconds while I cooked it. After 4 minutes of this, the pudding was starting to 'pull away' from the sides of the bowl and looked done. I waited the 15 minutes and then poked at it a bit with a butter knife to unstick it from the bowl before flipping it over.

Ta-daa! Behold:
Please, sir, I want some more.Collapse )

Amazingly, the treacle carmalized perfectly without burning at all, and the texture/moisture was right, it was not dried out or anything, seemed to survive the microwave just fine. It didn't stick to the bowl either (because it was a shallow enough bowl I guess and I buttered the heck out of it).

I saved the second one for later in some cling-wrap and tinfoil, and it seems to reheat in the microwave just fine as well.

So, there you have it. Be sure to eat it with milk. Oh, it took ages to get the treacle to run all over the bottom of the bowl before putting the batter on top, by the way. I guess they don't say 'slow as molasses' for nothing. If I was a little more patient, I could have easily done some funny little pattern with the treacle, like a star or something. XD

Anyway, next up on my list, I think, is "learn to make tea THE PROPER WAY" as opposed to the usual "tea bag in a mug and turn on the kettle."
LinkLeave a comment

Wolverine, POETAYTOES, and the Voynich Manuscript [Jun. 5th, 2009|11:52 am]
jaybee_bug
[Tags|]
[Current Mood |anxiousanxious]

Saw the Wolverine movie yesterday. I thought it was very good. I'm not a comic-book person, and I don't usually find movies based off comic books to be particularly compelling, but for some odd reason I've always really liked the X-Men movies. They're just . . . cool. :oD

I think the best part of the whole thing, though, was the people sitting a few rows in front of us. It was a matinee, so there was only a few people there besides us -- mainly what looked to be a mother and daughter, the mother ~60 years old or so, with fluffy, snow-white hair, that, I swear I am not making this up, was brushed and shaped to look rather suspiciously a lot like Wolverine's hair in previous movies.

It was freakin' hilarious. (They were clearly fans, and even clapped when the credits rolled.) You go, lady. XD

They were way more into it than the person sitting behind us, who entered the theatre 25 minutes into the movie, kept yawning very audibly and, at one point, snored a little. But, y'know, maybe they were just ducking into the theatre for a nap. :oP

I also lately have dared to attempt some actual cooking. Normally the extent of my culinary abilities are along the lines of "boil water for Ramen meal" or "scramble an egg." (If I get particularly crazy I might even cut those pre-marked Pilsbury cookie dough stick things and put those in the oven . . .) But I have been trying to learn about my 'roots', which includes Celtic ancestry, including Irish . . . so I tried to make a traditional Irish dish, leek and potato soup. This required first determining exactly what the f*** a leek is so that I might acquire this strange thing from the store that sells food. Yes.

Seriously, though, it actually turned out very nicely, a pleasant surprise. (It did require a lot of Googling on how to wash and prepare these weird leek-things, and what part you actually, y'know, ate.) Despite involving a whole lot of peeling and chopping and cutting, I didn't lose any fingers or any blood (ok, I knicked myself once), nor did I scald myself on boiling-hot soup (. . . much). Also, the soup tasted good. And we didn't eat at 10:00 at night because I was actually able to finish in a reasonable (if somewhat late) amount of time.

Yaaay.

Next up, maybe I'll try butterscotch, for some traditional Scottish cuisine. I . . . don't think I'm quite ready for haggis. Urf.

A webcomic from xkcd has called to my attention the existence of a curious thing called the Voynich manuscript. This is a mysterious and old illustrated text that experts still cannot read and have no idea what it says. I downloaded the .pdf of the book this morning (God bless the Internet) to look at the originals. My favorite part of the book, I think, is this picture, in the 'astronomical' section. The diagram on the left, specifically, is what captivates me so much. There's various circular pictures with stars and suns and moons and text in them, but this particular picture has the uncanny resemblance to a spiral galaxy. It looks like most folks are saying this book is ~15th century, before telescopes were in use, so . . . yeah! That's pretty weird.

There's also a real big fold-out portion containing nine circular diagrams that are connected, that's actually perhaps the coolest part of the book. When I was staring at the middle of the thing (at 400% magnification for the .pdf file), I swear, some of the other circles started to move slightly in an optical illusion, akin to something like the rotating snake illusion. It was very slight, though. Still, enough to make me wonder if, the original book, held at the proper distance, would invoke a motion optical illusion in the circle-diagrams, and if it was intentionally drawn to do so. Or maybe I'm just crazy. At any rate, you folks can see for yourself if you want, Wiki links to a site where you can download the .pdf file.
LinkLeave a comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]