First published in Danish in 1969, Freezing Point is another thrilling entry in the Faber Editions series, an expertly curated selection of rediscovered gems dedicated to showcasing radical literary voices from the past that still speak to us today. Bodelsen made his mark with crime novels, including Think of a Number (1968), which was adapted for the screen as The Silent Partner, featuring Elliott Gould and Susannah York. In 1969, he took a bit of a departure with Freezing Point, a chilling dystopian nightmare shot through with absurdist, deadpan humour. The novella takes place at three different points in time: 1973 (which would have been the near future back then), 1995 and 2022. Reading this novella today makes many of its themes seem eerily prescient, but more of that later as we get into the story. In the meantime, it’s another knockout read from Faber Editions, an imprint that continues to go from strength to strength.
Freezing Point revolves around Bruno, a thirty-two-year-old fiction editor who works for a weekly magazine. Bruno, who is single, has various authors on his books, and one of his main roles is to feed them ideas for stories which he can then edit and place in the magazine, assuming they are good enough to feature.
One morning in 1973, Bruno discovers a strange lump on his neck, which a biopsy confirms is malignant. Unfortunately, the cancer is incurable as it has already spread to Bruno’s liver; however, he is offered a tantalising opportunity by his physician. Recent developments in cryogenics mean that Bruno can choose to be ‘frozen down’ until such time when his cancer can be cured – maybe in twenty or thirty years’ time – or he can make the most of the few months that remain. It’s still early days for the freezing technology, and while Bruno wouldn’t be the first person to be frozen down, he’d still be something of a guinea pig for the new process. His single status and lack of close family make his participation in the experiment as simple as possible. Moreover, the researchers will cover all of Bruno’s expenses for the treatment, including the cost of storing his possessions until he is defrosted.
With the alternative being certain death within months, Bruno opts to be frozen down until a cure for his cancer can be found. But before the freezing procedure takes place, he has a one-night stand with Jenny Hollander, a lonely young ballet dancer he recently met at a dinner party, probably as a final fling. This initial section of the novella ends with Bruno being put under; then we fast-forward to 1995, when the time has come for our protagonist to be revived…
When Bruno is defrosted, his chronological age is fifty-four, but his biological age (the most important one in this new world) is still thirty-two, just as it was in 1973 when he was frozen down.
The defrosting process is bewildering and stressful for Bruno, giving rise to many questions, especially as all he can see is the inside of a hospital room and the limited view from its window. Why, for instance, is it sunny every day followed by rainfall at night? Why are there so few cars on the road? And what do those signs on nearby buildings mean? Slogans such as ONE-LIFE CO.; NOW-LIFE; and NATURAL LIFE–NATURAL DEATH? If he’s going to continue working as an editor, he really needs to understand the world around him…
Meanwhile, doctors and nurses maintain strict control over Bruno’s exposure to various elements, from his physical environment, medication and food to stimulants such as books, conversation and sex. Moreover, the medics have Bruno under constant surveillance via a camera in the ceiling of his room, monitoring his every movement for signs of stress.
Understandably, all this proves rather frustrating and frightening for Bruno, not least when he discovers that he’s been sterilised as a precautionary measure – a necessary step to arrest growth in the population, now that so many individuals are opting to live longer! Bruno’s kidneys were also ‘borrowed’ while he was under, a development that Bodelsen reveals in a deadpan tone, highlighting the absurdity of this crazy new world where body autonomy is a thing of the past.
[Doctor:] “In 1982, we had a catastrophic kidney shortage.”
[Bruno:] “A what?”
“A kidney shortage, lack of kidneys in store – it was a spare part that at that time was still indispensable. A law, a law with retroactive effect, an emergency law, allowed us to borrow kidneys from patients who were down and had no use for their kidneys. We borrowed your kidneys.”
“Did I get them back?”
“You got another pair when we found ourselves in the opposite situation – we had progressed to the synthetic computerised kidney and suddenly found ourselves with a kidney surplus.” (pp. 73–74)
Bruno also learns that Jenny Hollander is currently frozen down following a major injury to her spine. It might be another twenty years before spinal transplants will be possible, much to Bruno’s dismay.
Once Bruno and other recently defrosted patients have been ‘up’ for a few days, they learn that a new class divide has emerged. In short, society now consists of two classes: firstly, members of the ‘now-life’ class, who accept death when their first organ gives out; and secondly, members of the ‘immortal’ or ‘all-life’ class, who work hard to pay for their immortality. New organs, ‘freezing down’ and spells in hibernation all cost money, which means the immortals must work themselves to the bone to fund these expensive treatments.
Now Bruno and other recently defrosted individuals face a life-changing decision. Do they opt for a ‘natural’ (i.e. a reduced) lifespan of leisure in return for mortgaging their organs, thus keeping the immortals stocked with new hearts and other vital kit? Or do they choose immortality and accept an indefinite lifetime of hard work? It’s the only way to pay for the organ transplants, recalcification treatments and ‘freezing down’ periods which will extend their existence forever.
There are other considerations, too. Technology is advancing at such a pace that synthetically manufactured organs are starting to replace ‘organically’ harvested equivalents, meaning the potential for now-lifers to subsidise their leisurely lifestyles is starting to fall. At some point in the future, immortality might be the only viable option.
According to another recently defrosted man Bruno meets at the medical facility, this nightmarish new society is already starting to crumble.
“…They’ve been so busy with their immortality that they haven’t had time to work at anything else at all. The whole thing’s disintegrating. And now they’re going to produce synthetic spare organs and there’ll be no use for now-life people any longer. And then there’ll be a to-do, believe me.” (p. 91)
While the freezing down process stops the decay of most organs, the brain cells continue to age naturally, leading to problems with senility in otherwise youthful individuals. It’s possible that a solution to this mental degeneration might be found in the future, but for now, the decay remains an issue. Severe depression is also rife, especially amongst the recently defrosted, as they try to come to terms with the new world order and the choices they must make.
At first, the doctors attempt to get Bruno to play along. As he was one of the initial guinea pigs for the freezing down process, all his treatments have been financed by the researchers. In effect, his life has been extended for free, so now he ‘owes’ society something in return. However, Bruno’s depression, his rebellion against being confined and his overwhelming desire to see Jenny again are so strong that the doctors finally agree to another period of freezing down. If all goes well, he will be frozen until such time as Jenny can be equipped with a brand-new spine.
So, in part three, the novel fast-forwards to 2022, when Bruno and Jenny can be simultaneously defrosted and reunited. However, rather than this being the panacea that Bruno has been hoping for, new, more complex issues swiftly intervene…
He kissed her again and it really did seem as if he were kissing a doll. They had done something to her, or she must always have been like that. Did he know her at all, or had she just been his pretext for going through with two freezings – his pretext for demanding his eternity? Had they made him into a doll too? (p. 172)
One of the most impressive things about this novella is the chilling, claustrophobic atmosphere Bodelsen creates while keeping most of the action focused within the walls of Bruno’s hospital room. This sense of confinement adds greatly to the novella’s sinister mood. As the story unfolds, Bruno and others begin to rebel against the system that is trapping them. For instance, Bruno keeps asking if he can see copies of weekly magazines, partly to check that they still exist; but despite being told that this will happen ‘soon’, these magazines never appear. Other key information is also withheld from view, only to be glimpsed through the window of his room or passed on through hearsay. There are signs of agitators demonstrating outside the facility, and at one point, a break-in occurs, but the true nature of the external world is never explicitly revealed. Naturally, this allows the reader’s imagination to come into play, filling that void with all manner of nightmarish scenarios and uncertainties.
Moreover, the novella nails the sense that everything pleasurable about life has been stripped away, especially for the immortals / all-life class. What is the point in living forever if one has to work incessantly and adopt an obsessively healthy regime to pay for it all? I couldn’t help but think of all those manic fitness gurus on TikTok who advocate extreme fasting, clean living, daily journalling and punishing fitness regimes to maintain the perfect body and mind. Where is the joy in that? It’s nowhere to be seen. While many of the world’s ‘problems’, such as variations in the weather, seem to have been solved, Bruno longs for the spontaneity and pleasures of his former life, one with rain, flowers, cigarettes, books, music and delicious meals – food that looks and tastes like real food, not the squishy cubes of carefully controlled body fuel and drugs he is given now.
Bodelsen also anticipates various technological and societal developments that are either imminent or have actually taken place since the novel was published in 1969. For instance, the introduction of driverless electric cars, the proliferation of wall-sized TVs, the decline of print media (particularly weekly magazines) and society’s obsession with living longer and looking younger.
The problem with automatic cars and wall-sized television is that the need for both is minimal. The all-life class is too busy earning money for their all-life and their various freezing downs to be able to invest in such things. And the now-life people are only interested in euphoria and other means of forgetting that one day they will die. (pp. 107–108)
Ongoing monitoring systems which automatically administer personalised medicines are also in existence in the novella’s 2022 timeline. The challenge of preventing dementia, or at least arresting its progression, is another pertinent issue which Bodelsen hints at, predicting perhaps one of the biggest challenges of our times.
As this excellent, thought-provoking novella draws to a close, Bodelsen reveals the true horror of a world where immortality seems to be the only option. It’s a terrifying, nightmarish finish to a thoroughly absorbing story. Very highly recommended indeed, especially to readers with an interest in dystopian fiction. Fans of Sven Holm’s Termush, also published by Faber Editions, would likely appreciate this one!
(My thanks to the publishers for kindly providing a review copy, which I read for Karen’s #ReadIndies.)
















