This past semester has been a truly unique one in the history of language teaching, thanks to Cov... more This past semester has been a truly unique one in the history of language teaching, thanks to Covid-19. Since we thoroughly changed the way we taught our students during the pandemics, we thought it would be best to frame and contextualize what we have done into one edited volume. Hence, we came up with “The Best Practice of Teaching Korean Language at Our Department” that highlights our struggles and achievements in managing the classes online. Through this book, all lecturers involved share their best experiences in adjusting to the situation. The main content of this edited volume is 10 chapters consisting of articles containing the empirical experiences of five contributors, namely the teachers at the Korean Language and Culture Program, Faculty of Cultural Sciences Universitas Gadjah Mada during online classes. Each contributor has the responsibility of teaching different classes such as Grammar, Reading, Speaking, Writing, Translating, Semantics, and many others. Through their stories, they are tasked with portraying the real situation occurring during the on-classes and off-classes for the whole semester. This empirical experience cannot and should not be underestimated because it will be the basis for improving and preparing for the quality of education and learning Korean language in the future. It is undeniable that these experiences of teaching Korean language online may also have something in common with that of teaching other foreign languages in the same situation at other institutions. Simply for this reason, we find the book necessary to be written, otherwise this would be nothing but a passing phase in our history.
The aim of this study is to describe the Korean and Indonesian honorifics and compare the honorif... more The aim of this study is to describe the Korean and Indonesian honorifics and compare the honorifics of the two languages. This research is a qualitative research using a contrastive analysis method. Data in the Korean language is collected from the author's private messages with Korean, and data in Indonesian is collected from examples in the referenced literature and substituted with words from the same word class. Based on the analysis that has been carried out, Korean and Indonesian honorifics are both grammatically and lexically realized. However, the grammatical elements that make up Korean honorifics are not limited to one type of sentence, while in Indonesian it is only used in imperative sentences. Vocabularies that contain honorific meanings in Korean are found in adjectives, verbs, and personal pronouns, while in Indonesian mostly are found in personal pronouns and only a few in words from other word classes. From the point of view of Korean honorifics, Indonesian hon...
The aim of this study is to explain Korean and Javanese subject honorific and identify its simila... more The aim of this study is to explain Korean and Javanese subject honorific and identify its similarities and differences. To accomplish it, this research was conducted using literature review method. Data related to the Javanese language were taken from two Javanese drama scripts, namely Mak Ana Asu Mlebu Ngomah and Bantul Sangsaya Pinunjul , and Javanese drama titled Sri Ngilang by George Quinn. Korean language data was taken from television drama, Misaeng and Fight for My Way . Based on the analysis that has been carried out, despite the difference of the honorific system of Korean dan Javanese, Javanese has subject honorific as described in the Korean honorific system. Both languages use words that have honorific meaning to honor the subject and use words that are usually used for the animal to dishonor the subject of the sentence. The difference between both languages on subject honorific is Korean subject honorific is mainly realized grammatically, whereas in Javanese is re...
The aim of this study is to describe the Korean and Indonesian honorifics and compare the honorif... more The aim of this study is to describe the Korean and Indonesian honorifics and compare the honorifics of the two languages. This research is a qualitative research using a contrastive analysis method. Data in the Korean language is collected from the author's private messages with Korean, and data in Indonesian is collected from examples in the referenced literature and substituted with words from the same word class. Based on the analysis that has been carried out, Korean and Indonesian honorifics are both grammatically and lexically realized. However, the grammatical elements that make up Korean honorifics are not limited to one type of sentence, while in Indonesian it is only used in imperative sentences. Vocabularies that contain honorific meanings in Korean are found in adjectives, verbs, and personal pronouns, while in Indonesian mostly are found in personal pronouns and only a few in words from other word classes. From the point of view of Korean honorifics, Indonesian honorifics can be classified into hearer honorifics. In addition, the Indonesian language has subject honorifics, either directly or indirectly, which are lexically realized.
This research deals with the translation of Ayu Utami�s novel, Saman. It is aimed to identify t... more This research deals with the translation of Ayu Utami�s novel, Saman. It is aimed to identify translation problems of Ayu Utami�s Saman at word level. In addition, it also describe strategies to solve the problem. Data was carried out by identifying words which have problem of translation based on Mona Baker�s theory. Analysis was done by classifying data based on strategies which is used in translation, then analyze the propositional and expressive meaning of the words. Based on the analysis that had been done, it was found that culture-specific concept problem occured in 16 words, the target language lacks a specific term (hyponym) problem occured in 5 words, and differences in expressive meaning problem occured in 3 words. The problem that used the most strategies to solve is the culture-specific concept which uses 4 solving strategies. The target language lacks a specific term (hyponym) problem used 1 strategy, and differences in expressive meaning problem used 1 strategy....
The aim of this study is to explain Korean and Javanese subject honorific and identify its simila... more The aim of this study is to explain Korean and Javanese subject honorific and identify its similarities and differences. To accomplish it, this research was conducted using literature review method. Data related to the Javanese language were taken from two Javanese drama scripts, namely Mak Ana Asu Mlebu Ngomah and Bantul Sangsaya Pinunjul, and Javanese drama titled Sri Ngilang by George Quinn. Korean language data was taken from television drama, Misaeng and Fight for My Way. Based on the analysis, depite the differences of the honorific system of Korean dan Javanese, Javanese has subject honorific as similarly described in the Korean honorific system. Both languages use words that have honorific meaning to honor the subject and use words that are usually used for the animal to dishonor the subject of the sentence. The difference between both languages on subject honorific is that Korean subject honorific is mainly realized grammatically, whereas in the Javanese case, it is realized lexically. In addition, there are rules from the Korean government regarding the use of one type of subject honorific, abjonbeob; whereas in Javanese there are no rules related to the use of speech level.
This past semester has been a truly unique one in the history of language teaching, thanks to Cov... more This past semester has been a truly unique one in the history of language teaching, thanks to Covid-19. Since we thoroughly changed the way we taught our students during the pandemics, we thought it would be best to frame and contextualize what we have done into one edited volume. Hence, we came up with “The Best Practice of Teaching Korean Language at Our Department” that highlights our struggles and achievements in managing the classes online. Through this book, all lecturers involved share their best experiences in adjusting to the situation. The main content of this edited volume is 10 chapters consisting of articles containing the empirical experiences of five contributors, namely the teachers at the Korean Language and Culture Program, Faculty of Cultural Sciences Universitas Gadjah Mada during online classes. Each contributor has the responsibility of teaching different classes such as Grammar, Reading, Speaking, Writing, Translating, Semantics, and many others. Through their stories, they are tasked with portraying the real situation occurring during the on-classes and off-classes for the whole semester. This empirical experience cannot and should not be underestimated because it will be the basis for improving and preparing for the quality of education and learning Korean language in the future. It is undeniable that these experiences of teaching Korean language online may also have something in common with that of teaching other foreign languages in the same situation at other institutions. Simply for this reason, we find the book necessary to be written, otherwise this would be nothing but a passing phase in our history.
The aim of this study is to describe the Korean and Indonesian honorifics and compare the honorif... more The aim of this study is to describe the Korean and Indonesian honorifics and compare the honorifics of the two languages. This research is a qualitative research using a contrastive analysis method. Data in the Korean language is collected from the author's private messages with Korean, and data in Indonesian is collected from examples in the referenced literature and substituted with words from the same word class. Based on the analysis that has been carried out, Korean and Indonesian honorifics are both grammatically and lexically realized. However, the grammatical elements that make up Korean honorifics are not limited to one type of sentence, while in Indonesian it is only used in imperative sentences. Vocabularies that contain honorific meanings in Korean are found in adjectives, verbs, and personal pronouns, while in Indonesian mostly are found in personal pronouns and only a few in words from other word classes. From the point of view of Korean honorifics, Indonesian hon...
The aim of this study is to explain Korean and Javanese subject honorific and identify its simila... more The aim of this study is to explain Korean and Javanese subject honorific and identify its similarities and differences. To accomplish it, this research was conducted using literature review method. Data related to the Javanese language were taken from two Javanese drama scripts, namely Mak Ana Asu Mlebu Ngomah and Bantul Sangsaya Pinunjul , and Javanese drama titled Sri Ngilang by George Quinn. Korean language data was taken from television drama, Misaeng and Fight for My Way . Based on the analysis that has been carried out, despite the difference of the honorific system of Korean dan Javanese, Javanese has subject honorific as described in the Korean honorific system. Both languages use words that have honorific meaning to honor the subject and use words that are usually used for the animal to dishonor the subject of the sentence. The difference between both languages on subject honorific is Korean subject honorific is mainly realized grammatically, whereas in Javanese is re...
The aim of this study is to describe the Korean and Indonesian honorifics and compare the honorif... more The aim of this study is to describe the Korean and Indonesian honorifics and compare the honorifics of the two languages. This research is a qualitative research using a contrastive analysis method. Data in the Korean language is collected from the author's private messages with Korean, and data in Indonesian is collected from examples in the referenced literature and substituted with words from the same word class. Based on the analysis that has been carried out, Korean and Indonesian honorifics are both grammatically and lexically realized. However, the grammatical elements that make up Korean honorifics are not limited to one type of sentence, while in Indonesian it is only used in imperative sentences. Vocabularies that contain honorific meanings in Korean are found in adjectives, verbs, and personal pronouns, while in Indonesian mostly are found in personal pronouns and only a few in words from other word classes. From the point of view of Korean honorifics, Indonesian honorifics can be classified into hearer honorifics. In addition, the Indonesian language has subject honorifics, either directly or indirectly, which are lexically realized.
This research deals with the translation of Ayu Utami�s novel, Saman. It is aimed to identify t... more This research deals with the translation of Ayu Utami�s novel, Saman. It is aimed to identify translation problems of Ayu Utami�s Saman at word level. In addition, it also describe strategies to solve the problem. Data was carried out by identifying words which have problem of translation based on Mona Baker�s theory. Analysis was done by classifying data based on strategies which is used in translation, then analyze the propositional and expressive meaning of the words. Based on the analysis that had been done, it was found that culture-specific concept problem occured in 16 words, the target language lacks a specific term (hyponym) problem occured in 5 words, and differences in expressive meaning problem occured in 3 words. The problem that used the most strategies to solve is the culture-specific concept which uses 4 solving strategies. The target language lacks a specific term (hyponym) problem used 1 strategy, and differences in expressive meaning problem used 1 strategy....
The aim of this study is to explain Korean and Javanese subject honorific and identify its simila... more The aim of this study is to explain Korean and Javanese subject honorific and identify its similarities and differences. To accomplish it, this research was conducted using literature review method. Data related to the Javanese language were taken from two Javanese drama scripts, namely Mak Ana Asu Mlebu Ngomah and Bantul Sangsaya Pinunjul, and Javanese drama titled Sri Ngilang by George Quinn. Korean language data was taken from television drama, Misaeng and Fight for My Way. Based on the analysis, depite the differences of the honorific system of Korean dan Javanese, Javanese has subject honorific as similarly described in the Korean honorific system. Both languages use words that have honorific meaning to honor the subject and use words that are usually used for the animal to dishonor the subject of the sentence. The difference between both languages on subject honorific is that Korean subject honorific is mainly realized grammatically, whereas in the Javanese case, it is realized lexically. In addition, there are rules from the Korean government regarding the use of one type of subject honorific, abjonbeob; whereas in Javanese there are no rules related to the use of speech level.
Uploads
Books by iva hanani
The main content of this edited volume is 10 chapters consisting of articles containing the empirical experiences of five contributors, namely the teachers at the Korean Language and Culture Program, Faculty of Cultural Sciences Universitas Gadjah Mada during online classes. Each contributor has the responsibility of teaching different classes such as Grammar, Reading, Speaking, Writing, Translating, Semantics, and many others. Through their stories, they are tasked with portraying the real situation occurring during the on-classes and off-classes for the whole semester.
This empirical experience cannot and should not be underestimated because it will be the basis for improving and preparing for the quality of education and learning Korean language in the future. It is undeniable that these experiences of teaching Korean language online may also have something in common with that of teaching other foreign languages in the same situation at other institutions. Simply for this reason, we find the book necessary to be written, otherwise this would be nothing but a passing phase in our history.
Papers by iva hanani
Keywords: honorific system, Javanese, Korean, subject honorific
The main content of this edited volume is 10 chapters consisting of articles containing the empirical experiences of five contributors, namely the teachers at the Korean Language and Culture Program, Faculty of Cultural Sciences Universitas Gadjah Mada during online classes. Each contributor has the responsibility of teaching different classes such as Grammar, Reading, Speaking, Writing, Translating, Semantics, and many others. Through their stories, they are tasked with portraying the real situation occurring during the on-classes and off-classes for the whole semester.
This empirical experience cannot and should not be underestimated because it will be the basis for improving and preparing for the quality of education and learning Korean language in the future. It is undeniable that these experiences of teaching Korean language online may also have something in common with that of teaching other foreign languages in the same situation at other institutions. Simply for this reason, we find the book necessary to be written, otherwise this would be nothing but a passing phase in our history.
Keywords: honorific system, Javanese, Korean, subject honorific