
H. Vangelis
Related Authors
Vassilios A Tsihrintzis
National Technical University of Athens
Rotich Metto
University of Eldoret
Clement Kiptum
University of Eldoret
Sohan Wijesekera
University of Moratuwa
Walter Timo de Vries
Technical University of Munich
Uploads
Papers by H. Vangelis
The nodes of the drainage system that are most vulnerable to flood are determined based on eight indices: (i) conveyance (calculated using Manning equation for conduits) (m3/s); (ii) subcatchment area (m2); (iii) subcatchment width (m); (iv) subcatchment average slope (%); (v) manning coefficient of the impervious part of the subcatchment (s/m1/3); (vi) Manning coefficient of the pervious part of the subcatchment (s/m1/3); (vii) impervious area of the subcatchment (%); and (viii) SCS runoff Curve Number.
Four manholes (alternatives) are evaluated with respect to the aforementioned indices (evaluation criteria) as to their vulnerability to flood. The manholes are ranked from the most “risky” to the less “risky”. To this end, two different MCDA methods are applied, the Weighted Summation method and the Electre II method, while criteria weights are estimated by using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the respective Saaty scale (Saaty, 1977). Both Weighted Summation and Electre II are discrete quantitative methods dealing with quantitative data on the basis of alternative consequences and priorities (weights) assigned to the evaluation criteria (Janssen, 1992).