
Virag Sontakke
Related Authors
Shantanu Vaidya
Deccan College Post-Graduate Research Institute
Shrikant Ganvir
Deccan College Post-Graduate Research Institute
Amit Pendam
Deccan College Post-Graduate Research Institute
Derek Kennet
University of Chicago
NIKHIL DAS
Archaeological Survey of India
Julie Hanlon
University of Chicago
Pankaj Goyal
Deccan College Post-Graduate Research Institute
Akinori Uesugi
Tsurumi University
Uploads
Papers by Virag Sontakke
The Iron Age in South Asia mainly during the first millennium BCE was a period when social transformations towards the formation of urban society and states occurred in various parts of the region. In North India, an urban society emerged in the mid-first millennium BCE as a result of the socio-cultural developments in the Ganga valley that started in the latter part of the second millennium BCE. In the last few centuries of the first millennium BCE, the vast area of South Asia came into an extensive politico-economic network, in which flows of population, goods and information were facilitated, as exemplified by the emergence of the Mauryan Empire. In the southern part of South Asia, the Megalithic culture connected various parts of peninsular India and developed a resource exploitation system and an extensive socio-cultural network, although its chronological developments have not fully been revealed. By the end of the first millennium BCE, urban centres also emerged in the peninsula accelerating the interaction with the urban society in North India and the expansion of the urban network over South Asia. The trades with Southeast Asia and the Middle East can be regarded as a result of this expansion of the urban society in South Asia.
However, there are many issues to be investigated to fully understand the significance of the Iron Age in South Asia. The lack of a well-established chronology for this period makes it difficult to trace the socio-cultural developments in the Iron Age society/ies. Our understanding of the technological developments of iron production and its role in the social evolution is also meagre.
The articles in this volume summarize the present state of research and future perspectives of the Iron Age archaeology in South Asia. The article by Akinori Uesugi overviews the features of the Iron Age in South Asia. Vivek Dangi's article focuses on the evidence for the Iron Age culture in North India. The Megalithic culture in peninsular India is discussed in region-wise by three scholars; Virag Sontakke's article on the Vidarbha region in the eastern part of modern Maharashtra, K.P. Rao's article on Telangana and Andhra Pradesh and Abhayan's article on Kerala. The article by Tomoki Yamada examines the literary evidence on base metals described in Vedic texts. While it is certain that the vast area of South Asia witnessed regional developments of the Iron Age society in various parts of the region, there is no doubt that the different parts of South Asia had common features indicating the interconnection and interaction between regions. It is crucial not only to discuss the regional diversity and uniqueness of Iron Age cultures but also to examine the relationships between the regions to develop a better understanding of the dynamic social transformation of the Iron Age society.
Last but not least, I am grateful to the contributors to this volume and the participants to the conference.
Akinori Uesugi