
Thomas B White
Thomas White has previously contributed essays on atheism, the meaning of evil, and the notion of an imperfect God to CrossCurrents, a journal of theology. In addition, his other writings on a variety of topics, ranging from philosophy’s contribution to an understanding of Artificial Intelligence, the Arendt-Eichmann controversy and personal responsibility, Plato and the computer simulation of reality, evil in politics, the contemporary relevance of Plato's dialogue the Parmenides, the degradation of modern public speech, gender equality, and the fact-value distinction, have also been published in CrossCurrents, Aeon, Undercurrent Philosophy, and The Philosopher’s Eye, as well as in other publications. Mr. White’s poetry and fiction have also appeared in various venues online and in print in Canada, the United States, Belgium, Australia, and the United Kingdom.
He specializes in exploring every aspect of the human condition in the Socratic tradition, using philosophical, theological, literary, historical, and cinematic sources, arguments, and meditations. His literary and philosophical endeavors often intersect and enrich each other.
Supervisors: Socrates, Plato.
He specializes in exploring every aspect of the human condition in the Socratic tradition, using philosophical, theological, literary, historical, and cinematic sources, arguments, and meditations. His literary and philosophical endeavors often intersect and enrich each other.
Supervisors: Socrates, Plato.
less
Related Authors
Edward J Matthews
Fanshawe College
Joan Braune
Gonzaga University
Matthew J Sharpe
Australian Catholic University
Gregory S Moss
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Charles Reitz
Kansas City Kansas Community College
Andrew Norris
University of California, Santa Barbara
Marc Sable
Bethany College
Jason Pannone
Harvard University
Josiah Ober
Stanford University
Desmond Sunderland
The University of Sheffield
Uploads
Papers by Thomas B White
The two interpretations of Nietzsche considered are Trotsky's Marxist view and a more existential, humanistic understanding.
Using insights from a wide range of philosophers, writers, theologians, historians, and artists, such as Kafka, W.B. Yeats, Sissela Bok, Plato, Chris Hedges, Edvard Munch, Dante, Alberto Moravia, and Karl Marx, this essay explores forms of reverential sensibility. As reverence can be both a virtue, as well as a vice, Mr. White delineates both by profiling the enlightened and deformed versions. This investigation takes the reader into an examination of aspects of contemporary culture, as manifestations of deformed reverence (irreverence), as well as proposes a way forward toward a genuine reverence whereby both the religious and secular mind may find common ground in, what White calls, “the shared communion of the deed.”
To obtain a copy go to https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cros.12369
The two interpretations of Nietzsche considered are Trotsky's Marxist view and a more existential, humanistic understanding.
Using insights from a wide range of philosophers, writers, theologians, historians, and artists, such as Kafka, W.B. Yeats, Sissela Bok, Plato, Chris Hedges, Edvard Munch, Dante, Alberto Moravia, and Karl Marx, this essay explores forms of reverential sensibility. As reverence can be both a virtue, as well as a vice, Mr. White delineates both by profiling the enlightened and deformed versions. This investigation takes the reader into an examination of aspects of contemporary culture, as manifestations of deformed reverence (irreverence), as well as proposes a way forward toward a genuine reverence whereby both the religious and secular mind may find common ground in, what White calls, “the shared communion of the deed.”
To obtain a copy go to https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cros.12369