
Phil Rawlinson
Related Authors
Philip Rawlinson
The University of Sheffield
Constantine Mountrakis
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Sotiris Manolis
National & Kapodistrian University of Athens
Dr. Emma Tollefsen
University of Leicester
Christopher Knüsel
University of Exeter
Janusz Piontek
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
Hallie Buckley
University of Otago
A. Waters
University of Western Ontario
Ana Luisa Santos
Universidade de Coimbra
Francisca Alves Cardoso
Númena
Uploads
Papers by Phil Rawlinson
This paper defines the use of MSMs, before addressing their limitations and benefits. Modern clinical cases demonstrate a relationship between physical performance, biomechanical stress and the development of MSMs (Niinimaki 2011). Afterwards, the Lieverse et al. 2009 case study is examined to determine whether MSMs can successfully reflect past activities of a Palaeolithic hunter-gatherer society, before concluding with final remarks on the use of Musculoskeletal Stress Markers (MSMs) in future research.
Interest in human-like bipedality has attracted a focus on musculo-skeletal structural comparisons of the upper limb (i.e. quadrupedal forelimb) (Kikuchi 2010; Myatt, et al. 2012) and lower limb (hindlimb) (DeSilva 2009; Oishi, et al. 2012) between extant apes and modern humans. Chimpanzees (Pan. troglodytes) are often selected for comparison with H. sapiens due to their close phylogenetic relationship (Young, Hallgrimsson 2005).
This paper has two goals: first, the serial homologous nature of the upper and lower limbs are discussed in relation to evolutionary developmental programs of modular musculo-skeletal structures for integrated evolution of muscle groups for specific functional roles. Secondly, the gross and functional anatomies of chimpanzees and humans are detailed in relation to locomotive functionalities.
Osteological analyses of skeletal remains provide an objective view into the lives of individuals and historic communities from a unique vantage point that material culture studies do not allow. Historic trajectories of nutritional health, sexual divisions of labour, socioeconomic status and population migrations are among those questions that can be investigated.
This paper defines the use of MSMs, before addressing their limitations and benefits. Modern clinical cases demonstrate a relationship between physical performance, biomechanical stress and the development of MSMs (Niinimaki 2011). Afterwards, the Lieverse et al. 2009 case study is examined to determine whether MSMs can successfully reflect past activities of a Palaeolithic hunter-gatherer society, before concluding with final remarks on the use of Musculoskeletal Stress Markers (MSMs) in future research.
Interest in human-like bipedality has attracted a focus on musculo-skeletal structural comparisons of the upper limb (i.e. quadrupedal forelimb) (Kikuchi 2010; Myatt, et al. 2012) and lower limb (hindlimb) (DeSilva 2009; Oishi, et al. 2012) between extant apes and modern humans. Chimpanzees (Pan. troglodytes) are often selected for comparison with H. sapiens due to their close phylogenetic relationship (Young, Hallgrimsson 2005).
This paper has two goals: first, the serial homologous nature of the upper and lower limbs are discussed in relation to evolutionary developmental programs of modular musculo-skeletal structures for integrated evolution of muscle groups for specific functional roles. Secondly, the gross and functional anatomies of chimpanzees and humans are detailed in relation to locomotive functionalities.
Osteological analyses of skeletal remains provide an objective view into the lives of individuals and historic communities from a unique vantage point that material culture studies do not allow. Historic trajectories of nutritional health, sexual divisions of labour, socioeconomic status and population migrations are among those questions that can be investigated.