Annotated bibliography of studies in English, French, Italian and German of the development of th... more Annotated bibliography of studies in English, French, Italian and German of the development of the Latin philosophical vocabulary through translation from Greek
Parmenides: Annotated list of the editions and translations in English, French, German, Italian, ... more Parmenides: Annotated list of the editions and translations in English, French, German, Italian, Spanish and Portuguese
Annotated bibliography (561 items); studies in French, Italian, German, Spanish and Portuguese ar... more Annotated bibliography (561 items); studies in French, Italian, German, Spanish and Portuguese are available on the website ontology.co
ion 39; Abraham D. Stone: Simplicius and Avicenna on the essential corporeity of material substan... more ion 39; Abraham D. Stone: Simplicius and Avicenna on the essential corporeity of material substance 73; David C. Reisman: Avicenna at the ARCE 131-182. ———. 2003. Avicenna's Metaphysics in Context. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 75. ———. 2003. "Towards a history of Avicenna's distinction between immanent and transcendent causes." In Before and After Avicenna. Proceedings of the First Conference of the Avicenna Study Group, edited by Reisman, David C. and Al-Rahim, Ahmed H., 49-68. Leiden: Brill. 76. ———. 2005. "Avicenna and the Avicennian Tradition." In The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy, edited by Adamson, Peter and Taylor, Richard, 92-136. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. "My aim in this book is to present a history of the metaphysics of Abú `Ali al-Husayn ibn `Abdallah ibn Sinâ, known in the West by his Latinized name Avicenna. Since 1937, when Amélie-Marie Goichon published La distinction de l'essence et de l'existence ...
Ontology is the theory of objects and their ties. It provides criteria for distinguishing differe... more Ontology is the theory of objects and their ties. It provides criteria for distinguishing different types of objects (concrete and abstract, existent and nonexistent, real and ideal, independent and dependent) and their ties (relations, dependencies and predication). We can distinguish: a) formal, b) descriptive and c) formalized ontologies. a) Formal ontology was introduced by Edmund Husserl in his Logical Investigations (1): according to Husserl, its object is the study of the genera of being, the leading regional concepts, i.e., the categories; its true method is the eidetic reduction coupled with the method of categorial intuition. The phenomenological ontology is divided into two: (I) Formal, and (II) Regional, or Material, Ontologies. The former investigates the problem of truth on three basic levels: (a) Formal Apophantics, or formal logic of judgments, where the a priori conditions for the possibility of the doxic certainty of reason are to be sought, along with (b) the synt...
Annotated bibliography of studies in English, French, Italian and German of the development of th... more Annotated bibliography of studies in English, French, Italian and German of the development of the Latin philosophical vocabulary through translation from Greek
Parmenides: Annotated list of the editions and translations in English, French, German, Italian, ... more Parmenides: Annotated list of the editions and translations in English, French, German, Italian, Spanish and Portuguese
Annotated bibliography (561 items); studies in French, Italian, German, Spanish and Portuguese ar... more Annotated bibliography (561 items); studies in French, Italian, German, Spanish and Portuguese are available on the website ontology.co
ion 39; Abraham D. Stone: Simplicius and Avicenna on the essential corporeity of material substan... more ion 39; Abraham D. Stone: Simplicius and Avicenna on the essential corporeity of material substance 73; David C. Reisman: Avicenna at the ARCE 131-182. ———. 2003. Avicenna's Metaphysics in Context. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 75. ———. 2003. "Towards a history of Avicenna's distinction between immanent and transcendent causes." In Before and After Avicenna. Proceedings of the First Conference of the Avicenna Study Group, edited by Reisman, David C. and Al-Rahim, Ahmed H., 49-68. Leiden: Brill. 76. ———. 2005. "Avicenna and the Avicennian Tradition." In The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy, edited by Adamson, Peter and Taylor, Richard, 92-136. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. "My aim in this book is to present a history of the metaphysics of Abú `Ali al-Husayn ibn `Abdallah ibn Sinâ, known in the West by his Latinized name Avicenna. Since 1937, when Amélie-Marie Goichon published La distinction de l'essence et de l'existence ...
Ontology is the theory of objects and their ties. It provides criteria for distinguishing differe... more Ontology is the theory of objects and their ties. It provides criteria for distinguishing different types of objects (concrete and abstract, existent and nonexistent, real and ideal, independent and dependent) and their ties (relations, dependencies and predication). We can distinguish: a) formal, b) descriptive and c) formalized ontologies. a) Formal ontology was introduced by Edmund Husserl in his Logical Investigations (1): according to Husserl, its object is the study of the genera of being, the leading regional concepts, i.e., the categories; its true method is the eidetic reduction coupled with the method of categorial intuition. The phenomenological ontology is divided into two: (I) Formal, and (II) Regional, or Material, Ontologies. The former investigates the problem of truth on three basic levels: (a) Formal Apophantics, or formal logic of judgments, where the a priori conditions for the possibility of the doxic certainty of reason are to be sought, along with (b) the synt...
First part of a complete bibliography of Kit Fine' writings, available
at www.ontology.co/biblio/... more First part of a complete bibliography of Kit Fine' writings, available at www.ontology.co/biblio/finek-biblio.htm
WHAT SYLLOGISMS ARE: JC MR ITALIAN DRAFT2+ENGLISH
Cosa sono i sillogismi: tre visioni, otto seco... more WHAT SYLLOGISMS ARE: JC MR ITALIAN DRAFT2+ENGLISH Cosa sono i sillogismi: tre visioni, otto secoli.
At issue is the nature of “the syllogisms” in Prior Analytics. For centuries from the 1200s, the dominant view was enshrined in the medieval mnemonic “Barbara-Celarent”: syllogisms are certain valid premise-conclusion arguments commonly mislabeled “inferences”. In the mid-1900s many modern logicians adopted a contrary view credited to Jan Łukasiewicz: syllogisms are certain true universal propositions informally called “implications”. A fruitful two-sided debate ensued. Toward the last quarter of the 1900s, a third contender appeared. Independently, John Corcoran and Timothy Smiley took the class of syllogisms to exclude propositions while including not only the valid arguments recognized as syllogisms in medieval times but also deductions establishing validity. A deduction contains, over and above premises and conclusion of an argument, a chain of reasoning showing that the conclusion’s information is contained in that of the premises. The debate became three-sided for twenty years or more. The Łukasiewicz view lacks current defenders leaving the debate to the medieval and Corcoran-Smiley views. PLEASE POST YOUR FRANK COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVING THE ITALIAN AND THE ENGLISH.
Uploads
Papers by Raul Corazzon
at www.ontology.co/biblio/finek-biblio.htm
Cosa sono i sillogismi: tre visioni, otto secoli.
At issue is the nature of “the syllogisms” in Prior Analytics. For centuries from the 1200s, the dominant view was enshrined in the medieval mnemonic “Barbara-Celarent”: syllogisms are certain valid premise-conclusion arguments commonly mislabeled “inferences”. In the mid-1900s many modern logicians adopted a contrary view credited to Jan Łukasiewicz: syllogisms are certain true universal propositions informally called “implications”. A fruitful two-sided debate ensued.
Toward the last quarter of the 1900s, a third contender appeared. Independently, John Corcoran and Timothy Smiley took the class of syllogisms to exclude propositions while including not only the valid arguments recognized as syllogisms in medieval times but also deductions establishing validity. A deduction contains, over and above premises and conclusion of an argument, a chain of reasoning showing that the conclusion’s information is contained in that of the premises. The debate became three-sided for twenty years or more.
The Łukasiewicz view lacks current defenders leaving the debate to the medieval and Corcoran-Smiley views.
PLEASE POST YOUR FRANK COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVING THE ITALIAN AND THE ENGLISH.
https://www.academia.edu/s/6cf3f57007/what-syllogisms-are-corcoran-rind?source=link