
R. Bol
Related Authors
Charalampos Vasilatos
National & Kapodistrian University of Athens
Irene Good
Harvard University
Abdulwahab Saleh Alaug
Taiz University
Peter Campbell
Cranfield University
Viktor Trifonov
Institute for the History of Material Culture, Russian Academy of Sciences
Darren Gröcke
Durham University
Orhan Kavak
Dicle University
Viacheslav Kuleshov
Stockholm University
Rodrigo Goncalves
Washington University in St. Louis
Michel Gregoire
Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées, Université de Toulouse III Paul Sabatier
Uploads
Papers by R. Bol
..... ...... ....... .
..
. ...
..
.. ........... ... ..... ........ ... ...... ........ .......... ...... ... ..... .... ..........
......... .... .......... .. .... .... ......... ..... ... ...... ......... .. . ..... .... .. ..... .. ..... ... ..... .... .. ..... ...
....... .... .... ... ... .... ... .......... .... ..... .. ..... ...... ... ... ..... .... ........... .. ......... .. .... ........... ...
.... ......... ... ........ ... ... ......... ......... .. ... ........... . ..... ......... ... . .... ...... .. ... ....... .... .... .
..... ..... ... . ..... ......... .... ..... .............. ...... .... .. ... .... .......... .. ..... ... ... ... .. ........ .....
......... ..... .... ............
...... .... ....... .... ..... ......... ...... ...... ..... ... ..... .... ... ......... ......... ......... .. .... .........
.......... .......... ......... ....... .......... ... .......... .... ..... .... .... ..... ......... ... .... .. ... .... .. ... ..... ......
... ..... ...........
....... ..... ....
..
.......... ...
..
.......... .... ........ .. ... ....... ..... ..... ... .... ........ .. ... ......... .......
... ....... . ...... ............ ....... ... ..... ...... .. ... ....... ... ... ........ ...........
... .......... .. ...
..
. ...... .. ... ..... ....... .. ... ..... .... ...... .... ........ .. ..... ..... ..... ... ......... ....
...... ... ....... .... ... .......... ........ .. ... .. .. .. ...... .... ...... ....... ......... ......... ....... .. .......... .... .
.......... ... ..... .. ....... .... ..... ...... ...
......... .......... ... ... ...... ........ .. ....... ....... ........ .. ......... ........ .... ........ ....... ... ...... .....
....... ... ....... . ....... ...... .. . ...... .. ............ ....... .. ...... .... ........ .... ........... ...... .... ........ . ... .
....... ........ ........... . ........ .... .. ........ ....... ....... ... .......... ... .... ... ......... ....... ..... ...........
....... ... ........ ...... .. ... ............ ......
In the Spanish plots, nine and eight earthworm species, all belonging to the three ecological categories (epigeic, anecic and endogeic), were found under maize and permanent pasture, whereas at the English site five and seven different species were, respectively, identified. At both sites
13C isotopic values of the earthworm tissues reflected changes in diet from C 3 to C 4 with epigeic and epi/anecic worms in the maize plots showing one delta unit difference in relation to the ones found in the grassland plots. Anecic worms seemed to be less responsive to landuse changes. The higher 13C values
of the Spanish soils were also reflected in the earthworm tissues when compared with the English samples.
15N values showed no clear relationship with the cropping treatments but were clearly related to the ecological grouping, with endogeic worms reaching the highest values whereas for the epigeic and epi/anecic species the lowest values were obtained. This finding was also previously recorded by other authors1 and suggests that, in the future, stable isotope techniques could also be a useful tool in taxonomic studies.
..... ...... ....... .
..
. ...
..
.. ........... ... ..... ........ ... ...... ........ .......... ...... ... ..... .... ..........
......... .... .......... .. .... .... ......... ..... ... ...... ......... .. . ..... .... .. ..... .. ..... ... ..... .... .. ..... ...
....... .... .... ... ... .... ... .......... .... ..... .. ..... ...... ... ... ..... .... ........... .. ......... .. .... ........... ...
.... ......... ... ........ ... ... ......... ......... .. ... ........... . ..... ......... ... . .... ...... .. ... ....... .... .... .
..... ..... ... . ..... ......... .... ..... .............. ...... .... .. ... .... .......... .. ..... ... ... ... .. ........ .....
......... ..... .... ............
...... .... ....... .... ..... ......... ...... ...... ..... ... ..... .... ... ......... ......... ......... .. .... .........
.......... .......... ......... ....... .......... ... .......... .... ..... .... .... ..... ......... ... .... .. ... .... .. ... ..... ......
... ..... ...........
....... ..... ....
..
.......... ...
..
.......... .... ........ .. ... ....... ..... ..... ... .... ........ .. ... ......... .......
... ....... . ...... ............ ....... ... ..... ...... .. ... ....... ... ... ........ ...........
... .......... .. ...
..
. ...... .. ... ..... ....... .. ... ..... .... ...... .... ........ .. ..... ..... ..... ... ......... ....
...... ... ....... .... ... .......... ........ .. ... .. .. .. ...... .... ...... ....... ......... ......... ....... .. .......... .... .
.......... ... ..... .. ....... .... ..... ...... ...
......... .......... ... ... ...... ........ .. ....... ....... ........ .. ......... ........ .... ........ ....... ... ...... .....
....... ... ....... . ....... ...... .. . ...... .. ............ ....... .. ...... .... ........ .... ........... ...... .... ........ . ... .
....... ........ ........... . ........ .... .. ........ ....... ....... ... .......... ... .... ... ......... ....... ..... ...........
....... ... ........ ...... .. ... ............ ......
In the Spanish plots, nine and eight earthworm species, all belonging to the three ecological categories (epigeic, anecic and endogeic), were found under maize and permanent pasture, whereas at the English site five and seven different species were, respectively, identified. At both sites
13C isotopic values of the earthworm tissues reflected changes in diet from C 3 to C 4 with epigeic and epi/anecic worms in the maize plots showing one delta unit difference in relation to the ones found in the grassland plots. Anecic worms seemed to be less responsive to landuse changes. The higher 13C values
of the Spanish soils were also reflected in the earthworm tissues when compared with the English samples.
15N values showed no clear relationship with the cropping treatments but were clearly related to the ecological grouping, with endogeic worms reaching the highest values whereas for the epigeic and epi/anecic species the lowest values were obtained. This finding was also previously recorded by other authors1 and suggests that, in the future, stable isotope techniques could also be a useful tool in taxonomic studies.