RAJIV BANERJEE
I am a civil engineer as well as an academician. I have 27 years industry experience and about 11 years as academician .I worked various field of civil engineering like building construction, water supply and drainage,construction management, environmental engineering and design and construction of roads.
less
Related Authors
Interests
Uploads
Papers by RAJIV BANERJEE
cause large strains in addition to gravity loads. Shear walls and steel bracings in R.C. structures are currently the most often used
method of preventing lateral loads brought on by earthquakes, wind, blasts, etc. It is discovered that the X type of steel bracing
system greatly minimizes the maximum inter-story drift and lateral displacement and increases structural rigidity. Although shear
walls are among the best lateral load resisting techniques and are frequently utilized in construction, using steel bracing will be a
practical way to increase earthquake resistance. Shear walls are used in construction to sustain gravity loads and resist lateral
forces. RC shear walls are very stiff in the plane. The location of the shear wall affects how the building will function as a whole.
The placement of the shear wall must be optimum for the building to function effectively and efficiently. In order to determine the
effective lateral load system during an earthquake in high seismic zones, computer assisted analysis is performed using E-TABS.
Analysis of the RCC shear wall and rigid-bracing framed structure is the primary goal of this study. It also compares top story
displacement variation, cost per panel, and weight of the shear wall and bracing in the building.
The shear wall and braced frame at the center of the G+10 Story building are used to analyze it in the current work. Analysis is
done, and the outcomes for story drifts, maximum base shear, story drift, displacement, and time period are compared and
evaluated.
quite advantageous in high-rise buildings. It is suggested to incorporate them in structures built in the places where there are
chances of large intensity earthquakes or high winds. Positioning of the shear wall plays a very critical task in an
asymmetric and irregular building subjected to earthquake forces. In our study, the main aim is to locate the advantageous
position of the shear wall in Y-shaped asymmetric and irregular G+14 building in zone IV. The study is done by using a
software package, CSI ETABS ver. 18.0.2. We have carried out Response Spectrum Analysis and Time History Analysis for
this study. In this study, fourteen test models with unique location of shear wall are considered and parameters such as Time
Period, Storey Displacement, Static Eccentricity, Storey Drift, Joint Displacement, Base Shear, and Base Force, are
compared with the bare model. Thus, the best location of shear wall is suggested based on models having least static
eccentricity, minimum displacement, Minimum drift, Minimum time period, Minimum joint displacement and Maximum
base shear.
damage. In addition to providing lateral stiffness, shear walls also prevent roof or foor wobbling. If walls are strategically
placed within a structure, they may be able to withstand the lateral forces caused by wind and earthquakes. The investigation
of the effects of various floor area ratios on shear walls in a building with an irregular shape is explained in the paper. The
primary concern is torsion formation in a structure with an irregular layout. In an irregularly shaped building, the floor area
(F/A) ratio of the shear wall is discussed in this essay along with its causes, effects, and potential solutions. In Seismic Zone
III, a U-shaped building with 15 stories and medium soil conditions is the subject of the study. Its damping value is 5%. CSI
ETABS ver. 19 will be used to accomplish the modeling and analysis. The study will conclude by highlighting the rationale
behind selecting a certain test model that demonstrates the lowest levels of story drift, time period, story displacement and
base shear. This test model has a varied percent shear wall (impact of a variable floor area ratio of shear wall
cause large strains in addition to gravity loads. Shear walls and steel bracings in R.C. structures are currently the most often used
method of preventing lateral loads brought on by earthquakes, wind, blasts, etc. It is discovered that the X type of steel bracing
system greatly minimizes the maximum inter-story drift and lateral displacement and increases structural rigidity. Although shear
walls are among the best lateral load resisting techniques and are frequently utilized in construction, using steel bracing will be a
practical way to increase earthquake resistance. Shear walls are used in construction to sustain gravity loads and resist lateral
forces. RC shear walls are very stiff in the plane. The location of the shear wall affects how the building will function as a whole.
The placement of the shear wall must be optimum for the building to function effectively and efficiently. In order to determine the
effective lateral load system during an earthquake in high seismic zones, computer assisted analysis is performed using E-TABS.
Analysis of the RCC shear wall and rigid-bracing framed structure is the primary goal of this study. It also compares top story
displacement variation, cost per panel, and weight of the shear wall and bracing in the building.
The shear wall and braced frame at the center of the G+10 Story building are used to analyze it in the current work. Analysis is
done, and the outcomes for story drifts, maximum base shear, story drift, displacement, and time period are compared and
evaluated.
quite advantageous in high-rise buildings. It is suggested to incorporate them in structures built in the places where there are
chances of large intensity earthquakes or high winds. Positioning of the shear wall plays a very critical task in an
asymmetric and irregular building subjected to earthquake forces. In our study, the main aim is to locate the advantageous
position of the shear wall in Y-shaped asymmetric and irregular G+14 building in zone IV. The study is done by using a
software package, CSI ETABS ver. 18.0.2. We have carried out Response Spectrum Analysis and Time History Analysis for
this study. In this study, fourteen test models with unique location of shear wall are considered and parameters such as Time
Period, Storey Displacement, Static Eccentricity, Storey Drift, Joint Displacement, Base Shear, and Base Force, are
compared with the bare model. Thus, the best location of shear wall is suggested based on models having least static
eccentricity, minimum displacement, Minimum drift, Minimum time period, Minimum joint displacement and Maximum
base shear.
damage. In addition to providing lateral stiffness, shear walls also prevent roof or foor wobbling. If walls are strategically
placed within a structure, they may be able to withstand the lateral forces caused by wind and earthquakes. The investigation
of the effects of various floor area ratios on shear walls in a building with an irregular shape is explained in the paper. The
primary concern is torsion formation in a structure with an irregular layout. In an irregularly shaped building, the floor area
(F/A) ratio of the shear wall is discussed in this essay along with its causes, effects, and potential solutions. In Seismic Zone
III, a U-shaped building with 15 stories and medium soil conditions is the subject of the study. Its damping value is 5%. CSI
ETABS ver. 19 will be used to accomplish the modeling and analysis. The study will conclude by highlighting the rationale
behind selecting a certain test model that demonstrates the lowest levels of story drift, time period, story displacement and
base shear. This test model has a varied percent shear wall (impact of a variable floor area ratio of shear wall