
Peter Clark
Address: Canterbury Archaeological Trust
92a Broad Street
Canterbury
Kent CT1 2LU
UK
92a Broad Street
Canterbury
Kent CT1 2LU
UK
less
Related Authors
Matt Leivers
Wessex Archaeology
Simon Stevens
University College London
Hugo Anderson-Whymark
National Museums Scotland
Peter Topping
The University of Newcastle
Clive Bonsall
University of Edinburgh
Sarah-Jayne Botfield
The University of Manchester
Frances M A Healy
Cardiff University
Kathryn M Price
University of Reading
InterestsView All (28)
Uploads
Papers by Peter Clark
'Mobilities' as a concept in archaeological research offers a valuable platform to reflect upon dynamic processes in the past in contradistinction to the static nature of much of the archaeological record. Direct evidence is arguably relatively rare, represented by finds relating to movement by horse, wheeled vehicles or boats. This paper considers the evidence of the Dover Bronze Age Boat (c. 1500 BC) from the perspective of Marc Augé's concept of 'non-place', asking what this find might contribute to our understanding of the nature and value of mobility to communities of the Transmanche zone in the mid-2 nd millennium BC.
The inundation of the Northwest European landmass by the melting ice sheets in the earlier part of the Holocene created a new world for the indigenous hunter-gatherers, an interdigitation of land and sea that characterises the region today. This paper explores the perception of the sea by prehistoric communities in both the short and long term; at the same time the destroyer of ancestral homelands and the provider of new opportunities. The marine environment of course requires technological aids – boats – to negotiate its waters and the development of such technologies was an important adaptive response. In addition, navigating the sea, particularly when navigating 'over the horizon' required good navigation skills. How did prehistoric mariners find their way across the seas, and what was their cognitive understanding of the world in which they moved? Modern concepts of space and navigation are inappropriate for prehistory, and this paper explores alternative cognitive perceptions of the sea, drawing on the notions of 'smooth' and 'striated' space put forward by Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari to suggest a more satisfying appreciation of prehistoric perceptions of the sea.
Résumé
L'inondation de la terre européenne du NW, par la fonte des glaces au début de l'Holocène, a créé un nouveau monde pour les chasseurs-cueilleurs autochtones, un entrecroisement de terre et de mer qui caractérise la région aujourd'hui. Cet article explore la perception de la mer par les sociétés préhistoriques, à court terme et sur la longue durée ; tout à la fois destructrice des terres ancestrales et fournisseuse de nouvelles opportunités. L'environnement marin nécessite bien sûr une assistance technologique – les bateaux – pour parcourir ses eaux et le développement de ces technologies a été une réponse adaptative importante. En outre, la navigation en mer, en particulier lors de la navigation « au-delà de l'horizon » nécessite de bonnes compétences nautiques. Comment les marins préhistoriques trouvaient-ils leur chemin en mer, et quelle était leur compréhension cognitive du monde dans lequel ils se sont déplacés ? Les concepts modernes de navigation et d'espace sont inappropriés pour la préhistoire, et cet article explore les perceptions cognitives alternatives, en faisant appel au concept d'espaces « lisse » et « strié » mis en avant par Gilles Deleuze et Felix Guattari pour suggérer une appréciation plus juste des perceptions préhistoriques de la mer.
'Mobilities' as a concept in archaeological research offers a valuable platform to reflect upon dynamic processes in the past in contradistinction to the static nature of much of the archaeological record. Direct evidence is arguably relatively rare, represented by finds relating to movement by horse, wheeled vehicles or boats. This paper considers the evidence of the Dover Bronze Age Boat (c. 1500 BC) from the perspective of Marc Augé's concept of 'non-place', asking what this find might contribute to our understanding of the nature and value of mobility to communities of the Transmanche zone in the mid-2 nd millennium BC.
The inundation of the Northwest European landmass by the melting ice sheets in the earlier part of the Holocene created a new world for the indigenous hunter-gatherers, an interdigitation of land and sea that characterises the region today. This paper explores the perception of the sea by prehistoric communities in both the short and long term; at the same time the destroyer of ancestral homelands and the provider of new opportunities. The marine environment of course requires technological aids – boats – to negotiate its waters and the development of such technologies was an important adaptive response. In addition, navigating the sea, particularly when navigating 'over the horizon' required good navigation skills. How did prehistoric mariners find their way across the seas, and what was their cognitive understanding of the world in which they moved? Modern concepts of space and navigation are inappropriate for prehistory, and this paper explores alternative cognitive perceptions of the sea, drawing on the notions of 'smooth' and 'striated' space put forward by Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari to suggest a more satisfying appreciation of prehistoric perceptions of the sea.
Résumé
L'inondation de la terre européenne du NW, par la fonte des glaces au début de l'Holocène, a créé un nouveau monde pour les chasseurs-cueilleurs autochtones, un entrecroisement de terre et de mer qui caractérise la région aujourd'hui. Cet article explore la perception de la mer par les sociétés préhistoriques, à court terme et sur la longue durée ; tout à la fois destructrice des terres ancestrales et fournisseuse de nouvelles opportunités. L'environnement marin nécessite bien sûr une assistance technologique – les bateaux – pour parcourir ses eaux et le développement de ces technologies a été une réponse adaptative importante. En outre, la navigation en mer, en particulier lors de la navigation « au-delà de l'horizon » nécessite de bonnes compétences nautiques. Comment les marins préhistoriques trouvaient-ils leur chemin en mer, et quelle était leur compréhension cognitive du monde dans lequel ils se sont déplacés ? Les concepts modernes de navigation et d'espace sont inappropriés pour la préhistoire, et cet article explore les perceptions cognitives alternatives, en faisant appel au concept d'espaces « lisse » et « strié » mis en avant par Gilles Deleuze et Felix Guattari pour suggérer une appréciation plus juste des perceptions préhistoriques de la mer.
The earliest significant features recorded on the site dated to the early Neolithic (roughly 3700–3600 cal BC). The took the form of three concentric arcs of intercutting pit clusters forming discrete ‘segments’, the fills of which produced rich assemblages of pottery, flintwork, animal bone and other material. Much of this material appeared to have been deliberately placed in the pits rather than representing casual disposal of refuse. There are indications that material placed in different pits at different times may have derived from the same source, a ‘midden’ or some such which was not located during the excavations. The pit clusters appeared to have resulted from repeated pit-digging in the same location over an extended period. Although the overall morphology of the site is reminiscent of a ‘causewayed enclosure’ the pit cluster segments do not appear to represent ditches and the gaps between segments seem to be fortuitous, rather than planned ‘causeways’ between ditch segments. The site therefore contributes a more nuanced understanding of the heterogeneity of monumental architecture in the early Neolithic of the British Isles.
The site probably went out of use in around 3600 cal BC, and little evidence for middle or later Neolithic activity was recovered. Beaker and early Bronze Age features included four inhumations, two of which associated within a small ring-ditch probably representing a ploughed-out burial mound. A set of two parallel ditches dating to the middle/late Bronze Age running for 90m across the site and between 1.6m and 2.4 apart might represent a track- or drove-way, or alternatively a boundary division flanking a small bank and hedge. The eastern part of a late Bronze Age subrectangular enclosure was also recorded, within which was a cluster of post-holes and small pits that presumably relate to a structure or structures, reminiscent of the cluster of structural features within the Central Enclosure at East Kent Access, just to the west of Chalk Hill. Apart from a few residual sherds of late Iron Age and Roman pottery, there was no further evidence of activity at Chalk Hill until the Anglo-Saxon period when a solitary sunken-featured building was recorded along with a small number of isolated pits and post-holes. Chalk Hill was then given over to agricultural use during the medieval period with the establishment of an extensive field system and hollow way running across the site, with perhaps some extractive industry suggested by a large quarry pit immediately to the south-east of the hollow way. The hillside remained in agricultural use until the construction of the new road.