
Paul West
Related Authors
Muqtedar Khan
University of Delaware
David Seamon
Kansas State University
Remo Caponi
University of Cologne
Armando Marques-Guedes
UNL - New University of Lisbon
Martin O'Neill
University of York
Joseph Raz
Columbia University
Derek H Alderman
University of Tennessee Knoxville
Ian G Baird
University of Wisconsin-Madison
María Rebeca Padilla de la Torre
Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes
Chaminda Hettiarachchi
University of Moratuwa
Uploads
Papers by Paul West
The sharing of content has a long history and learning materials were being shared well before the term OER was coined in an online forum hosted by UNESCO on the Impact of Open Courseware for Higher Education in Developing Countries and Creative Commons released its open copyright licenses in 2002. Open Educational Resources (OER) are teaching, learning, and research materials that are either (a) in the public domain or (b) licensed in a manner that provides everyone with free and perpetual permission to engage in the 5R activities (Retain, Reuse, Revise, Remix, Redistribute).
OER are quality educational materials that are freely and openly licensed, and are available online to anyone, anytime. The creation of OER is usually funded by governments or donors and the resultant products are released under a Creative Commons open license or directly into the public domain. OER may be developed by volunteers provided that all contributions are properly recognised.
OER are customisable or ‘re-mixable’ which requires that the editable, underlying digital assets are made available to enable others to adapt the works.
The central purpose of this report is to provide recommendations to governments in light of the COVID-19 pandemic about how to use digital technologies to deliver better quality and more resilient education systems that enable everyone to have access to equitable learning opportunities.
This report contains three separate documents (Acts), each of which can be read and used independently.
Act One is intended primarily for the most senior government officials and contains a summary of the report’s approach and main recommendations.
Act Two provides the detailed exposition, arguments and evidence upon which these recommendations are based, and is intended primarily for those in government who are charged with implementing them.
Act Three contains 14 Guidance Notes which provide succinct advice on delivering important distinct aspects of the overall report.
The sharing of content has a long history and learning materials were being shared well before the term OER was coined in an online forum hosted by UNESCO on the Impact of Open Courseware for Higher Education in Developing Countries and Creative Commons released its open copyright licenses in 2002. Open Educational Resources (OER) are teaching, learning, and research materials that are either (a) in the public domain or (b) licensed in a manner that provides everyone with free and perpetual permission to engage in the 5R activities (Retain, Reuse, Revise, Remix, Redistribute).
OER are quality educational materials that are freely and openly licensed, and are available online to anyone, anytime. The creation of OER is usually funded by governments or donors and the resultant products are released under a Creative Commons open license or directly into the public domain. OER may be developed by volunteers provided that all contributions are properly recognised.
OER are customisable or ‘re-mixable’ which requires that the editable, underlying digital assets are made available to enable others to adapt the works.
The central purpose of this report is to provide recommendations to governments in light of the COVID-19 pandemic about how to use digital technologies to deliver better quality and more resilient education systems that enable everyone to have access to equitable learning opportunities.
This report contains three separate documents (Acts), each of which can be read and used independently.
Act One is intended primarily for the most senior government officials and contains a summary of the report’s approach and main recommendations.
Act Two provides the detailed exposition, arguments and evidence upon which these recommendations are based, and is intended primarily for those in government who are charged with implementing them.
Act Three contains 14 Guidance Notes which provide succinct advice on delivering important distinct aspects of the overall report.