This research includes first, to study juridical understanding related to the concept of "three-d... more This research includes first, to study juridical understanding related to the concept of "three-dimensional form" found in industrial brand and design; second, to analyze whether the three-dimensional form in the industrial brand and design overlapped; and third, to provide prescription for the three-dimensional overlapping arrangement. This research is a normative legal research using a legislative approach, a case approach, and a conceptual approach. From the results of this research, it can be concluded that the first, three-dimensional form is potential to get protection in two different IPR regimes, namely brand and industrial design. Second, these conditions then lead to overlapping arrangements in the brand regime and industrial design regime. Although both brand and industrial design protect the three-dimensional form, the object of protection is different. This is due to the basis of the protection of each regime (the brand emphasizes differentiation, while industrial design emphasizes the new aesthetic impression). Third, the condition is given a suggestion to provide a boundary between the three-dimensional brand and industrial design, as seen from several aspects: general forms, forms that should not be listed, public perception, distinctiveness due to use and expansion of the rejection space for the signs to be made as a brand.
This research includes first, to study juridical understanding related to the concept of "three-d... more This research includes first, to study juridical understanding related to the concept of "three-dimensional form" found in industrial brand and design; second, to analyze whether the three-dimensional form in the industrial brand and design overlapped; and third, to provide prescription for the three-dimensional overlapping arrangement. This research is a normative legal research using a legislative approach, a case approach, and a conceptual approach. From the results of this research, it can be concluded that the first, three-dimensional form is potential to get protection in two different IPR regimes, namely brand and industrial design. Second, these conditions then lead to overlapping arrangements in the brand regime and industrial design regime. Although both brand and industrial design protect the three-dimensional form, the object of protection is different. This is due to the basis of the protection of each regime (the brand emphasizes differentiation, while industrial design emphasizes the new aesthetic impression). Third, the condition is given a suggestion to provide a boundary between the three-dimensional brand and industrial design, as seen from several aspects: general forms, forms that should not be listed, public perception, distinctiveness due to use and expansion of the rejection space for the signs to be made as a brand.
Uploads
Papers by Natalia Nadeak