
Myrtle Hooper
Related Authors
Bert Vaux
University of Cambridge
Ahmar Mahboob
The University of Sydney
Armando Marques-Guedes
UNL - New University of Lisbon
Adam M Croom
Case Western Reserve University
Rob S E A N Wilson
University of California, Santa Cruz
Balthasar Bickel
University of Zurich, Switzerland
Yasemin Bayyurt
Bogazici University
Carla Freccero
University of California, Santa Cruz
Eckart Otto
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Willy A Renandya
Nanyang Technological University
Uploads
Papers by Myrtle Hooper
than reading water as being at the behest of humans, we seek to recognise the valency it is given in the stories, and in this light to explore the impacts of its presence, its actions, and its absence.
the subject of ‘dirt’, and inspired this paper which examines the ‘journeys into dirt’ by
explorer figures in Patrick White’s 1957 novel Voss and Robyn Davidson’s 1980 memoir
Tracks. Drawing on theory of dirt developed by material ecocritic Helen Sullivan and by
philosopher Olli Lagerspetz we demonstrate that the narratives of their travels show them
engaged in transformative encounters with the Australian desert. In doing so we challenge
Tom Lynch’s reading of the two texts as ‘traversals’ which portray the desert as ‘alien,
hostile and undifferentiated void’. Using Keith Garebian’s distinction between ‘desert’
and ‘garden’ we examine how these explorers find and respond to ‘the garden in the
desert’. Davidson couches her memoir as an exploration narrative and treats the desert as
a ‘lived space’ which she ‘writes home’; having learned how to ‘be’ in it, and so to ‘recover’
the garden in the desert. Like her, Voss and his companions experience the desert as
beautiful and inspirational, even, at times, nurturant and sustaining. Since Voss’s
orientation is spiritual and transcendent, however, White’s treatment of the desert shows
conceptual and corporeal boundaries between human and environment shifting and
fading in their interaction with it. In both texts episodes occur of immersion in dirt – dust
in Tracks and mud in Voss – which serve to illustrate and to emphasise the interconnectedness
we humans have with the essential, elemental environment of dirt.
Keywords: deserts; journeys; travel narratives; dirt theory; ecocriticism; Voss; Tracks.
than reading water as being at the behest of humans, we seek to recognise the valency it is given in the stories, and in this light to explore the impacts of its presence, its actions, and its absence.
the subject of ‘dirt’, and inspired this paper which examines the ‘journeys into dirt’ by
explorer figures in Patrick White’s 1957 novel Voss and Robyn Davidson’s 1980 memoir
Tracks. Drawing on theory of dirt developed by material ecocritic Helen Sullivan and by
philosopher Olli Lagerspetz we demonstrate that the narratives of their travels show them
engaged in transformative encounters with the Australian desert. In doing so we challenge
Tom Lynch’s reading of the two texts as ‘traversals’ which portray the desert as ‘alien,
hostile and undifferentiated void’. Using Keith Garebian’s distinction between ‘desert’
and ‘garden’ we examine how these explorers find and respond to ‘the garden in the
desert’. Davidson couches her memoir as an exploration narrative and treats the desert as
a ‘lived space’ which she ‘writes home’; having learned how to ‘be’ in it, and so to ‘recover’
the garden in the desert. Like her, Voss and his companions experience the desert as
beautiful and inspirational, even, at times, nurturant and sustaining. Since Voss’s
orientation is spiritual and transcendent, however, White’s treatment of the desert shows
conceptual and corporeal boundaries between human and environment shifting and
fading in their interaction with it. In both texts episodes occur of immersion in dirt – dust
in Tracks and mud in Voss – which serve to illustrate and to emphasise the interconnectedness
we humans have with the essential, elemental environment of dirt.
Keywords: deserts; journeys; travel narratives; dirt theory; ecocriticism; Voss; Tracks.