
Michael Cernea
Related Authors
David Seamon
Kansas State University
Sebastian Toc
The Research Institute for Quality of Life
Noe Cornago
University of the Basque Country, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
Heath Cabot
University of Bergen
Robert Latham
York University
Horacio Almanza Alcalde
Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia
Veena Das
Johns Hopkins University
Uday Chandra
SFS Qatar (Georgetown University)
Marcia Vera Espinoza
Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh
Abhijit Guha
Vidyasagar University
InterestsView All (11)
Uploads
Papers by Michael Cernea
The three objectives of the resettlement review were:
(1) To ascertain the scale of involuntary resettlement in the Bank's portfolio, and determine regional and sectoral trends and composition.
(2) To analyze ongoing resettlement programs for their quality, consistency with policy, and outcomes.
(3) To identify recurrent problems affecting performance, initiate midstream remedial actions, and prepare a follow-up strategy for addressing resettlement more effectively.
Rather than being carried out as a desk-bound and static stock-taking exercise this review was deliberately designed as a broad process of resettlement analysis in the field, carried out by the Bank's relevant regional and central units jointly with the Borrowers. The main product of this comprehensive review is not simply its final report, but the process that the review triggered throughout 1993 across the Bank and on the ground. The review process consisted of intensified field supervision, analysis of project preparation, appraisal, supervision, and implementation, on-site consultation with non-governmental organizations (NGOs), sectoral resettlement studies, development of new technical tools for resettlement planning, and a considerable number of joint remedial actions initiated by the Bank and the Borrowers for projects failing to meet set objectives.