
Majid Asadnia
Related Authors
Arezki SMAILI
Ecole Nationale Polytechnique d'Alger
Ceyhun yılmaz
University of Gaziantep
Walaa M Shehata Sliman
Suez University Faculty of Petroleum and Mining Engineering
Steph Munro
The University of Western Australia
Uploads
Papers by Majid Asadnia
process. The proposed process is a simple Claude cycle combined with two absorption refrigeration systems (ARSs).
The mass flow rate of the liquid hydrogen (LH2) production is about 260 tones per day and the specific energy
consumption (SEC) and the exergy efficiency of the system are12.7 kWh/kgLH2 and 31.6% respectively. The results
show that the HX-201 and HX-203 heat exchangers have the highest total environmental impact and total exergy
cost. Therefore, they are in the priority of improving to achieve better performance for overall the process. In
addition, the P-101 pump has the highest exergoeconomic and exergoenvairomental coefficient. Therefore, its capital
investment cost and its environmental impact should be reduced to decrease the cost and environmental impact
of the whole system. Furthermore, the HX-201 heat exchanger has the lowest exergoeconomic and exergoenvairomental
coefficient. Therefore, the technical performance of this device should be improved to reduce the
cost and environmental impact of the whole system. In addition, a 3D sensitivity analysis is investigated to consider
simultaneously the interaction between technical, economic, and environmental aspects of the system. Accordingly,
there is an optimum value for the isentropic efficiency of the C-1 compressor that should be examined, and the
more/fewer is its pressure ratio, the more/fewer are its exergy costs and/or environmental impacts. Moreover, whilst
an optimum pressure ratio should be found out for EXP-2 expander, a higher isentropic efficiency definitely decreases
its exergy cost and environmental impact. In addition, the less/more is the temperature approach Tmin of
HX-1 heat exchanger, the less/more are its exergy costs and/or its environmental impacts. As well as, its input
pressure should be maximized to achieve minimum exergy costs and environmental impacts of the component.
Finally, tower pressure should be raised as much as possible to achieve the least exergy costs and environmental
impacts of the T-101 generator. However, its inlet temperature has an optimum value that should be found out.
process. The proposed process is a simple Claude cycle combined with two absorption refrigeration systems (ARSs).
The mass flow rate of the liquid hydrogen (LH2) production is about 260 tones per day and the specific energy
consumption (SEC) and the exergy efficiency of the system are12.7 kWh/kgLH2 and 31.6% respectively. The results
show that the HX-201 and HX-203 heat exchangers have the highest total environmental impact and total exergy
cost. Therefore, they are in the priority of improving to achieve better performance for overall the process. In
addition, the P-101 pump has the highest exergoeconomic and exergoenvairomental coefficient. Therefore, its capital
investment cost and its environmental impact should be reduced to decrease the cost and environmental impact
of the whole system. Furthermore, the HX-201 heat exchanger has the lowest exergoeconomic and exergoenvairomental
coefficient. Therefore, the technical performance of this device should be improved to reduce the
cost and environmental impact of the whole system. In addition, a 3D sensitivity analysis is investigated to consider
simultaneously the interaction between technical, economic, and environmental aspects of the system. Accordingly,
there is an optimum value for the isentropic efficiency of the C-1 compressor that should be examined, and the
more/fewer is its pressure ratio, the more/fewer are its exergy costs and/or environmental impacts. Moreover, whilst
an optimum pressure ratio should be found out for EXP-2 expander, a higher isentropic efficiency definitely decreases
its exergy cost and environmental impact. In addition, the less/more is the temperature approach Tmin of
HX-1 heat exchanger, the less/more are its exergy costs and/or its environmental impacts. As well as, its input
pressure should be maximized to achieve minimum exergy costs and environmental impacts of the component.
Finally, tower pressure should be raised as much as possible to achieve the least exergy costs and environmental
impacts of the T-101 generator. However, its inlet temperature has an optimum value that should be found out.