
Lorin Friesen
Phone: 604-217-1248
Address: Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada
Address: Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada
less
Related Authors
Ahmar Mahboob
The University of Sydney
Cristiana Facchini
Università di Bologna
Cem Tanova
Eastern Mediterranean University
Simon McIntyre
The University of New South Wales
Armando Marques-Guedes
UNL - New University of Lisbon
Egil Asprem
Stockholm University
John Sutton
Macquarie University
Simon Springer
The University of Newcastle
Michael Lessard-Clouston
Biola University
Ali Karakaş
Mehmet Akif Ersoy University
Uploads
Papers by Lorin Friesen
What is missing is a general theory of cognition to tie all of this information together.
Back in the 1980s, a cognitive theory was developed that began with a system of cognitive styles and was expanded through an in-depth study of biographies. It was discovered at that time that this theory mapped in a general way onto the brain. This cognitive theory, known as the theory of mental symmetry, has recently been tested as a meta-theory by using it to analyze a number of fields and theories dealing with human thought and behavior.
This paper shows that personality traits that were discovered by mental symmetry correspond in detail to the functioning of brain regions described in current neurological papers. In brief, the cognitive model suggests that there are seven cognitive styles: There are four simple styles, and there are three composite styles that combine the thinking of the simple styles.
Two of the simple styles use emotions and emphasize a circuit composed of orbitofrontal cortex, inferior frontal cortex, temporal lobe, and amygdala, with one in the left hemisphere and the other in the right hemisphere. The other two simple styles use confidence and emphasize a circuit consisting of dorsolateral frontal cortex, frontopolar cortex, parietal cortex, and hippocampus, again with one in the left hemisphere and the other in the right hemisphere.
The three composite styles form a processing chain. The first composite style combines the two simple emotional styles and emphasizes the ventral striatum, and dopamine. This leads to the second composite style, which combines the two simple confidence styles and emphasizes the anterior cingulate, the dorsal striatum, and serotonin. This is followed by the third composite style which balances the functioning of the mind and emphasizes the thalamus and noradrenaline.
This paper will begin by describing the theory of mental symmetry. The methodology of cognitively natural, semi-rigorous, analogical analysis will then be introduced: The analogical reasoning comes from finding similarities in the way that the mind analyzes various situations and topics. This is cognitively natural because it is guided by how cognition naturally interprets situations, and it is semi-rigorous because analogies are used in a manner that is consistent with how they are used in science.
This methodology will be used to analyze many fundamental characteristics of scientific thought. The same cognitive methodology will then be used to analogically relate these fundamental characteristics of scientific thought to central doctrines of Christian theology, including the Trinity, atonement, justification, righteousness, and the conversion experience. The way that a fundamentalist mindset causes these doctrines to be misinterpreted will also be described.
Extending this same methodology to biblical exegesis will then be discussed. Approximately half of the original Greek text of the New Testament has been analyzed using this cognitive approach. If the Gospel of Matthew is analyzed from a cognitive perspective, then an extensive correlation can be found between the biblical text and Western history, extending from the Roman era until the present time. This correlation is too extensive to be fully presented in this paper, but two sample texts will be analyzed. The full 640 page analysis is available on the mental symmetry website.
What is missing is a general theory of cognition to tie all of this information together.
Back in the 1980s, a cognitive theory was developed that began with a system of cognitive styles and was expanded through an in-depth study of biographies. It was discovered at that time that this theory mapped in a general way onto the brain. This cognitive theory, known as the theory of mental symmetry, has recently been tested as a meta-theory by using it to analyze a number of fields and theories dealing with human thought and behavior.
This paper shows that personality traits that were discovered by mental symmetry correspond in detail to the functioning of brain regions described in current neurological papers. In brief, the cognitive model suggests that there are seven cognitive styles: There are four simple styles, and there are three composite styles that combine the thinking of the simple styles.
Two of the simple styles use emotions and emphasize a circuit composed of orbitofrontal cortex, inferior frontal cortex, temporal lobe, and amygdala, with one in the left hemisphere and the other in the right hemisphere. The other two simple styles use confidence and emphasize a circuit consisting of dorsolateral frontal cortex, frontopolar cortex, parietal cortex, and hippocampus, again with one in the left hemisphere and the other in the right hemisphere.
The three composite styles form a processing chain. The first composite style combines the two simple emotional styles and emphasizes the ventral striatum, and dopamine. This leads to the second composite style, which combines the two simple confidence styles and emphasizes the anterior cingulate, the dorsal striatum, and serotonin. This is followed by the third composite style which balances the functioning of the mind and emphasizes the thalamus and noradrenaline.
This paper will begin by describing the theory of mental symmetry. The methodology of cognitively natural, semi-rigorous, analogical analysis will then be introduced: The analogical reasoning comes from finding similarities in the way that the mind analyzes various situations and topics. This is cognitively natural because it is guided by how cognition naturally interprets situations, and it is semi-rigorous because analogies are used in a manner that is consistent with how they are used in science.
This methodology will be used to analyze many fundamental characteristics of scientific thought. The same cognitive methodology will then be used to analogically relate these fundamental characteristics of scientific thought to central doctrines of Christian theology, including the Trinity, atonement, justification, righteousness, and the conversion experience. The way that a fundamentalist mindset causes these doctrines to be misinterpreted will also be described.
Extending this same methodology to biblical exegesis will then be discussed. Approximately half of the original Greek text of the New Testament has been analyzed using this cognitive approach. If the Gospel of Matthew is analyzed from a cognitive perspective, then an extensive correlation can be found between the biblical text and Western history, extending from the Roman era until the present time. This correlation is too extensive to be fully presented in this paper, but two sample texts will be analyzed. The full 640 page analysis is available on the mental symmetry website.
This book is written for the average reader and the writing style is not academic. However, it does accurately describe many forms of thought that have become dominant in today’s society. This is significant considering that it was written almost twenty years ago. I have made only minor edits to the text itself, but have added a number of explanatory footnotes (which are preceded by the phrase ‘Note from 2020:’). Hopefully, these footnotes add some 2020 hindsight.
This book was never published, but it was divided into four parts and placed on the mentalsymmetry.com website in 2010. Volume 1 of A Programmer’s Guide to the Mind was recently uploaded onto academia.edu by someone else, so I thought that it would be useful to upload official copies of both Volume 1 and 2.
This book includes the following topics that are not in the later volume: Quine's Web of Belief, Martin Heidegger, music, Maslow's hierarchy of needs, Kohlberg's stages of conscience, Foucault's epistemes, and unsolved problems of philosophy, In addition, there is a fairly extensive discussion of technical thought.
Interaction between different aspects of the mind will naturally cause a concept of God to emerge, and the type of divine concept that forms will depend upon how the various aspects of the mind are functioning and interacting—regardless of whether such a God actually exists or not. If the mind functions in an integrated manner, then the concept of God that forms is that of a Christian Trinity.
Incarnation can be analyzed as an internal struggle to integrate abstract technical thought with concrete technical thought, illustrated by the deep relationship between math and science. Far from being an incomprehensible mystery, it appears that a concept of incarnation will naturally emerge when the most rational aspects of human thought are integrated. Similarly, the Christian ‘prayer of salvation’ can be analyzed from a purely cognitive perspective as a method of mentally viewing a concept of God indirectly through a concept of incarnation.
The final section of this book contains a 70 page overview of the latest findings in neurology, covering all the major cortical and subcortical regions of the brain, quoting from almost a hundred recent papers.