
Lisa Kurland
Related Authors
Jaswinder K Sethi
University of Cambridge
Sonia J Moisá
Auburn University
john van der kamp
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Hakan Gurvit
Istanbul University
Amado Salvador Peña
VUmc Amsterdam
Ndubuisi Machebe
University of Nigeria, Nsukka
rudolph bauer
Washington Center for Consciousness Studies
Sule Tinaz
Yale University School of Medicine
Panagiotis Kourtesis
The American College of Greece Deree College
Alessandro Vercelli
Università degli Studi di Torino
Uploads
Papers by Lisa Kurland
database for hospital-based emergency care in Denmark including the selection of quality indicators. The aim of
the study was to describe the Delphi process that contributed to the selection of quality indicators for a new
national database of hospital-based emergency care in Denmark.
Methods: The process comprised a literature review followed by a modified-Delphi survey process, involving a
panel of 54 experts (senior clinicians, researchers and administrators from the emergency area and collaborating
specialties). Based on the literature review, we identified 43 potential indicators, of which eight were time-critical
conditions. We then consulted the Expert panel in two consecutive rounds. The Expert panel was asked to what
extent each indicator would be a good measure of hospital-based emergency care in Denmark. In each round, the
Expert panel participants scored each indicator on a Likert scale ranging from one (=disagree completely) through
to six (=agree completely). Consensus for a quality indicator was reached if the median was greater than or equal
to five (=agree). The Delphi process was followed by final selection by the steering group for the new database.
Results: Following round two of the Expert panel, consensus was reached on 32 quality indicators, including three
time-critical conditions. Subsequently, the database steering group chose a set of nine quality indicators for the
initial version of the national database for hospital-based emergency care.
Conclusions: The two-round modified Delphi process contributed to the selection of an initial set of nine quality
indicators for a new a national database for hospital-based emergency care in Denmark. Final selection was made
by the database steering group informed by the Delphi process.
database for hospital-based emergency care in Denmark including the selection of quality indicators. The aim of
the study was to describe the Delphi process that contributed to the selection of quality indicators for a new
national database of hospital-based emergency care in Denmark.
Methods: The process comprised a literature review followed by a modified-Delphi survey process, involving a
panel of 54 experts (senior clinicians, researchers and administrators from the emergency area and collaborating
specialties). Based on the literature review, we identified 43 potential indicators, of which eight were time-critical
conditions. We then consulted the Expert panel in two consecutive rounds. The Expert panel was asked to what
extent each indicator would be a good measure of hospital-based emergency care in Denmark. In each round, the
Expert panel participants scored each indicator on a Likert scale ranging from one (=disagree completely) through
to six (=agree completely). Consensus for a quality indicator was reached if the median was greater than or equal
to five (=agree). The Delphi process was followed by final selection by the steering group for the new database.
Results: Following round two of the Expert panel, consensus was reached on 32 quality indicators, including three
time-critical conditions. Subsequently, the database steering group chose a set of nine quality indicators for the
initial version of the national database for hospital-based emergency care.
Conclusions: The two-round modified Delphi process contributed to the selection of an initial set of nine quality
indicators for a new a national database for hospital-based emergency care in Denmark. Final selection was made
by the database steering group informed by the Delphi process.