Mock jurors (college students and prospective jurors) made individual decisions regarding liabili... more Mock jurors (college students and prospective jurors) made individual decisions regarding liability and damages (before and after deliberation) in response to a case of sexual harassment. There were no significant differences in damage awards from college students and prospective jurors. There was evidence of racial bias among White mock jurors against plaintiffs who accused a Black supervisor of sexual harassment: Lower damages were recommended for plaintiffs who accepted an offer to meet for drinks in a Black supervisor's room than for plaintiffs who accepted the same offer from a White supervisor. There was also evidence of racial bias among White mock jurors against Black plaintiffs: Lower damages were recommended for Black plaintiffs than for White plaintiffs. These effects were present in the individual judgments of college students and prospective jurors. However, these forms of racial bias did not carry over into the decisions made by juries comprised of college students or prospective jurors. Subtle racial biases operating primarily at a subconscious level may get washed out in the complex task of coming to agreement on an appropriate award. The effects of manipulated variables on damage awards probably are overestimated in general in mock juror studies that do not examine group verdicts. Public opinion surveys paint a rosier picture of the attitudes of Whites toward Blacks than in the past (Schuman, Steeh, Bobo, & Krysan, 1997). Nevertheless, discrimination against Blacks still prevails in many facets of life that have a negative impact on quality of life (Sidanius & Pratto, 1999), and a substantial proportion of Whites still may be opposed to full racial equality (
... The experiment was a 2 x 2 X 2 X 2 between subiect factorial design.=l"nere werethre... more ... The experiment was a 2 x 2 X 2 X 2 between subiect factorial design.=l"nere werethree independent variables:, workahblic/cheating spouse, two childrenlno children, and husbandlwife as the stimulus person; and one predictor variable: sex of the subject. ...
Mock jurors (college students and prospective jurors) made individual decisions regarding liabili... more Mock jurors (college students and prospective jurors) made individual decisions regarding liability and damages (before and after deliberation) in response to a case of sexual harassment. There were no significant differences in damage awards from college students and prospective jurors. There was evidence of racial bias among White mock jurors against plaintiffs who accused a Black supervisor of sexual harassment: Lower damages were recommended for plaintiffs who accepted an offer to meet for drinks in a Black supervisor's room than for plaintiffs who accepted the same offer from a White supervisor. There was also evidence of racial bias among White mock jurors against Black plaintiffs: Lower damages were recommended for Black plaintiffs than for White plaintiffs. These effects were present in the individual judgments of college students and prospective jurors. However, these forms of racial bias did not carry over into the decisions made by juries comprised of college students or prospective jurors. Subtle racial biases operating primarily at a subconscious level may get washed out in the complex task of coming to agreement on an appropriate award. The effects of manipulated variables on damage awards probably are overestimated in general in mock juror studies that do not examine group verdicts. Public opinion surveys paint a rosier picture of the attitudes of Whites toward Blacks than in the past (Schuman, Steeh, Bobo, & Krysan, 1997). Nevertheless, discrimination against Blacks still prevails in many facets of life that have a negative impact on quality of life (Sidanius & Pratto, 1999), and a substantial proportion of Whites still may be opposed to full racial equality (
... The experiment was a 2 x 2 X 2 X 2 between subiect factorial design.=l"nere werethre... more ... The experiment was a 2 x 2 X 2 X 2 between subiect factorial design.=l"nere werethree independent variables:, workahblic/cheating spouse, two childrenlno children, and husbandlwife as the stimulus person; and one predictor variable: sex of the subject. ...
Uploads
Papers by Linda Foley