
Kenneth Barron
Related Authors
Imma Forino
Politecnico di Milano
Armando Marques-Guedes
UNL - New University of Lisbon
Kati (Katalin) Prajda
University of Vienna
Johannes Preiser-Kapeller
Austrian Academy of Sciences
Michael Fire
Ben Gurion University
Bogdan Gabrys
University of Technology Sydney
PALIMOTE JUSTICE
RIVERS STATE POLYTECHNIC
A. M . Jazuli
Usmanu Dan Fodiyo University, Sokoto-Nigeria
Cesar Cury
Univesidade Federal Fluminense - UFF
Uploads
Papers by Kenneth Barron
class, as well as the consequences of these goals for the motivation and performance of 311 undergraduates.
Two dimensions of achievement motivation (workmastery and competitive orientations; J. T.
Spence & R. L. Helmreich, 1983) predicted the goals endorsed. Individuals high in workmastery
were more likely to adopt mastery goals and less likely to adopt work avoidance goals, whereas
competitive individuals were more likely to endorse performance and work avoidance goals. Students
adopting mastery goals were more interested in the class, but students adopting performance goals
achieved higher levels of performance. These results suggest that both mastery and performance
goals can lead to important positive outcomes in college classes.
authors examined both the short-term and long-term consequences of students' achievement goals in an
introductory psychology course. Mastery goals positively predicted subsequent interest in the course, but
not course grades. Performance goals positively predicted grades, but not interest. Three semesters later,
the authors obtained measures of continued interest in the discipline and long-term performance. Mastery
goals predicted subsequent enrollment in psychology courses, whereas performance goals predicted
long-term academic performance. These positive and complementary effects of mastery and performance
goals on different measures of academic success are consistent with a multiple-goals perspective in which
both goals can have beneficial consequences in college education.
class, as well as the consequences of these goals for the motivation and performance of 311 undergraduates.
Two dimensions of achievement motivation (workmastery and competitive orientations; J. T.
Spence & R. L. Helmreich, 1983) predicted the goals endorsed. Individuals high in workmastery
were more likely to adopt mastery goals and less likely to adopt work avoidance goals, whereas
competitive individuals were more likely to endorse performance and work avoidance goals. Students
adopting mastery goals were more interested in the class, but students adopting performance goals
achieved higher levels of performance. These results suggest that both mastery and performance
goals can lead to important positive outcomes in college classes.
authors examined both the short-term and long-term consequences of students' achievement goals in an
introductory psychology course. Mastery goals positively predicted subsequent interest in the course, but
not course grades. Performance goals positively predicted grades, but not interest. Three semesters later,
the authors obtained measures of continued interest in the discipline and long-term performance. Mastery
goals predicted subsequent enrollment in psychology courses, whereas performance goals predicted
long-term academic performance. These positive and complementary effects of mastery and performance
goals on different measures of academic success are consistent with a multiple-goals perspective in which
both goals can have beneficial consequences in college education.